References
- Yoon MJ, Song MJ, Shin SJ, Kim E. Comparison of apical transportation and change of working length in K3, NRT and ProFile rotary instruments using transparent resin block. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:59-65. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.1.59
- Ruddle CJ. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments: current concepts for preparing the root canal system. Aust Endod J 2003;29:87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2003.tb00521.x
- Ingle JI. The need for endodontic instrument standardization. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1955;8: 1211-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(55)90385-6
- Grossman LI. Transactions of the second international conference on endodontics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1958. Ingle JI, Levine M. The need for uniformity of endodontic instruments, equipment and filling materials. 234:123-142.
- Stenman E, Spangberg LS. Root canal instruments are poorly standardized. J Endod 1993;19:327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81358-0
- Ingle JI. A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(61)90477-7
- Heuer M. The biomechanics of endodontic therapy. Dent Clin North Am 1963;13:341-359.
- American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Revised ANSI/ ADA specification no. 28: root canal files and reamers, type K. 1981.
- American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. ANSI/ADA specification no. 28: root canal files and reamers, type K. 2008.
- ISO-Standards ISO 3630 Dentistry-Root canal instruments -Part 1: General requirements and test methods. Geneve: International Organization for Standardization; 2008. p1-18.
- American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. ANSI/ADA specification no. 101: root canal instruments-general requirements. 2001.
- Zinelis S, Magnissalis EA, Margelos J, Lambrianidis T. Clinical relevance of standardization of endodontic files dimensions according to the ISO 3630-1 specification. J Endod 2002;28:367-370. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200205000-00005
- Keate KC, Wong M. Comparison of endodontic file tip quality. J Endod 1990;16:486-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80178-6
- Cormier CJ, von Fraunhofer JA, Chamberlain JH. A comparison of endodontic file quality and file dimensions. J Endod 1988;14:138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80215-2
- Dearing GJ, Kazemi RB, Stevens RH. An objective evaluation comparing the physical properties of two brands of stainless steel endodontic hand files. J Endod 2005;31:827-830. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000158236.10177.74
- Schäfer E, Dzepina A, Danesh G. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:757-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00358-5
- Lask JT, Walker MP, Kulild JC, Cunningham KP, Shull PA. Variability of the diameter and taper of size #30, 0.04 nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2006;32:1171-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.013
- Hatch GW, Roberts S, Joyce AP, Runner R, McPherson JC 3rd. Comparative study of the variability of 0.06 tapered rotary endodontic files to current taper standards. J Endod 2008;34:463-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.003
- Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, Testarelli L. Fatigue resistance of enginedriven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008;34:1003-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007
- El Batouty KM, Elmallah WE. Comparison of canal transportation and changes in canal curvature of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2011;37: 1290-1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.024
- Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickeltitanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:798-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.017
- Oh SR, Chang SW, Lee Y, Gu Y, Son WJ, Lee W, Baek SH, Bae KS, Choi GW, Lim SM, Kum KY. A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:622-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.025
- Kim HC, Yum J, Hur B, Cheung GS. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickeltitanium rotary files. J Endod 2010;36:147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.037
- Hou X, Yahata Y, Hayashi Y, Ebihara A, Hanawa T, Suda H. Phase transformation behaviour and bending property of twisted nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 2011;44:253-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01818.x
- Camps JJ, Pertot WJ. Relationship between file size and stiffness of stainless steel instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:260-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00081.x
- Camps JJ, Pertot WJ, Levallois B. Relationship between file size and stiffness of nickel-titanium instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11:270-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1995.tb00502.x
- Schäfer E, Tepel J. Relationship between design features of endodontic instruments and their properties. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture. J Endod 2001;27:299-303. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200104000-00018
- Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endod 2000;26:414-417. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200007000-00009
- Kim BH, Choi KK, Park SH, Choi GW. A comparison of the shaping ability of four rotary nickel-titanium files in simulated root canals. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:88-95. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.088
Cited by
- Diameter and Taper Variability of Single-file Instrumentation Systems and Their Corresponding Gutta-percha Cones vol.44, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.005