한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.65-79
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경관단위분류를 통한 경관가치평가 및 경관계획적 활용

Landscape Assessment and Landscape Planning based on Landscapetope Classification

  • 권오성 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 이현택 (경북대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 나정화 (경북대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 조현주 (대전발전연구원 도시기반연구실)
  • Kwon, Oh-Sung (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Taek (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ra, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Ju (Lab. Urban Infrastrucutre, Daejeon Development Institute)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.05
  • 심사 : 2014.02.17
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study selected Nakdong River basin zone in Daegu as an example area to conduct landscapetope classification and aesthetic value assessment of landscape according to the classified landscapetope. The main result of this research can be summed up as following. First, the result of landscapetope type classification showed 28 types of landscapetope including complex residential area (AA), natural stream type with copious vegetation (BA), forest type centered on mixed forest of soft and hardwood (EB) along with 129 types of imputed specific landscapetope. The result of the total first assessment using B-VAT showed the first grade 10 types, II grade 4 types, III grade6 types, IV grade 3 types, 5 types for V grade with the lowest value. The second assessment conducted toward the landscapetope types with the grade higher than the average (including III grade) in the result of the first assessment showed that there are 66 spaces for the sites (1a, 1b) with special meaning for aesthetic landscape evaluation. And also, there were 69 spaces for those (2a, 2b, 2c) with meaning for aesthetic landscape evaluation. The design model of this research is largely divided into improvement goal and specific execution plan. First, the improvement goal is divided into 6 categories including conservation area, complementary area, and restoration area, and the specific execution plan is divided into 14 categories including special landscape management area, general landscape management area, conservation of hill areas with optically good condition. A comprehensive master plan was suggested by directly applying the set landscape planning model to the subject place of this research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aragao, L.E.O.C.․Y. Ed Shimabukuro. F.D.B.E. Sant and M. Williams. 2005. Landscape pattern and spatial variability of leaf area index in Eastern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 211: 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.062
  2. Bryant, M. M. 2006. Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales. Landscape and Urban Planning 76: 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.029
  3. Cho, H. J.․J. H. Ra and O. S. Kwon. 2012. The Development and Application of Biotop Value Assessment Tool(B-VAT) Based on GIS to Measure Landscape Value of Biotop. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 18(4): 13-26. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.4.013
  4. Cho, H. J.․J. H. Ra․J. H. Sagong and Y. S. Ryu. 2009. The Type Classification and Characteristic Analysis of Biotope in Rural Areas. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 15(4): 19-32.
  5. Cook, E. A. and H. N. Lier. 1994. Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks. Elsevier Sciences.
  6. Hersperger, A. M. 2006. Spatial adjacencies and interactions: Neighborhood mosaics for landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 77: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.009
  7. Kim, J. H․H. T. Lee․H. J. Cho and J. H. Sagong. 2012. Landscape Assessment and Improvement of the View Area by Selecting the Landscape Control Point. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(5): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.5.019
  8. Kim, S. H. and B. E. Yang. 2009. A Study on Rural Landscape Planning Based on Rural Village Landscape. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(3): 82-90.
  9. Kong, F.․H. Yin and N. Nakagoshi. 2007. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning 79: 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013
  10. Lee, S. B.․S. Y. Lee and J. M. Ha. 2009. A Study on Viewshed Frequency Analysis for establishing Viewpoints. The Architectural Institute of Korea 25(8): 293-300.
  11. Leser, H. 1983. Geookologie. Geographische Rundschau 35: 212-221.
  12. Maruani, T. and I. Amit-Cohen. 2007. Open space planning models: A review of approaches and methods. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(1-2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.003
  13. Park, C. J.․J. H. Ra․H. J. Cho․J. H. Kim and O. S. Kwon 2012. A Development and Application of the Landscape Evaluation Model Based on the Biotope Classification. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(4): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.4.114
  14. Ra, J. H.․S. C. Lee․J. H. Sagong and Y. S. Ryu. 2001. An Analysis of Biotope Structure in Terms of Species and Biotope Preservation in Metropolitan Area. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 28(6): 29-51.
  15. Ra, J. H.․H. J. Cho and H. T. Lee. 2008. A Basic Study on Establishment of the Ecological Landscape Planning Model. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(4): 48-64.
  16. Robinson, L.․J. P. Newell and J.M. Marzluff 2005, Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 71(1): 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.02.005
  17. Yang, J․L. Zhao․J. Mcbride and P. Gong. 2009. Can you see green? Assessing the visibility of urban forests in cities. Landscape Urban Planning 91: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.004