Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.1.065

Landscape Assessment and Landscape Planning based on Landscapetope Classification  

Kwon, Oh-Sung (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Hyun-Taek (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
Ra, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
Cho, Hyun-Ju (Lab. Urban Infrastrucutre, Daejeon Development Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.17, no.1, 2014 , pp. 65-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study selected Nakdong River basin zone in Daegu as an example area to conduct landscapetope classification and aesthetic value assessment of landscape according to the classified landscapetope. The main result of this research can be summed up as following. First, the result of landscapetope type classification showed 28 types of landscapetope including complex residential area (AA), natural stream type with copious vegetation (BA), forest type centered on mixed forest of soft and hardwood (EB) along with 129 types of imputed specific landscapetope. The result of the total first assessment using B-VAT showed the first grade 10 types, II grade 4 types, III grade6 types, IV grade 3 types, 5 types for V grade with the lowest value. The second assessment conducted toward the landscapetope types with the grade higher than the average (including III grade) in the result of the first assessment showed that there are 66 spaces for the sites (1a, 1b) with special meaning for aesthetic landscape evaluation. And also, there were 69 spaces for those (2a, 2b, 2c) with meaning for aesthetic landscape evaluation. The design model of this research is largely divided into improvement goal and specific execution plan. First, the improvement goal is divided into 6 categories including conservation area, complementary area, and restoration area, and the specific execution plan is divided into 14 categories including special landscape management area, general landscape management area, conservation of hill areas with optically good condition. A comprehensive master plan was suggested by directly applying the set landscape planning model to the subject place of this research.
Keywords
Landscapetope; Aesthetic Value Assessment; Landscape Planning; Basin Zone;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bryant, M. M. 2006. Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales. Landscape and Urban Planning 76: 23-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Aragao, L.E.O.C.․Y. Ed Shimabukuro. F.D.B.E. Sant and M. Williams. 2005. Landscape pattern and spatial variability of leaf area index in Eastern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 211: 240-256.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Cho, H. J.․J. H. Ra and O. S. Kwon. 2012. The Development and Application of Biotop Value Assessment Tool(B-VAT) Based on GIS to Measure Landscape Value of Biotop. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 18(4): 13-26.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Cho, H. J.․J. H. Ra․J. H. Sagong and Y. S. Ryu. 2009. The Type Classification and Characteristic Analysis of Biotope in Rural Areas. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 15(4): 19-32.   과학기술학회마을
5 Cook, E. A. and H. N. Lier. 1994. Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks. Elsevier Sciences.
6 Hersperger, A. M. 2006. Spatial adjacencies and interactions: Neighborhood mosaics for landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 77: 227-239.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Lee, S. B.․S. Y. Lee and J. M. Ha. 2009. A Study on Viewshed Frequency Analysis for establishing Viewpoints. The Architectural Institute of Korea 25(8): 293-300.   과학기술학회마을
8 Kim, J. H․H. T. Lee․H. J. Cho and J. H. Sagong. 2012. Landscape Assessment and Improvement of the View Area by Selecting the Landscape Control Point. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(5): 19-32.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim, S. H. and B. E. Yang. 2009. A Study on Rural Landscape Planning Based on Rural Village Landscape. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(3): 82-90.   과학기술학회마을
10 Kong, F.․H. Yin and N. Nakagoshi. 2007. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning 79: 240-252.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Leser, H. 1983. Geookologie. Geographische Rundschau 35: 212-221.
12 Maruani, T. and I. Amit-Cohen. 2007. Open space planning models: A review of approaches and methods. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(1-2): 1-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Park, C. J.․J. H. Ra․H. J. Cho․J. H. Kim and O. S. Kwon 2012. A Development and Application of the Landscape Evaluation Model Based on the Biotope Classification. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(4): 114-126.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ra, J. H.․S. C. Lee․J. H. Sagong and Y. S. Ryu. 2001. An Analysis of Biotope Structure in Terms of Species and Biotope Preservation in Metropolitan Area. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 28(6): 29-51.   과학기술학회마을
15 Ra, J. H.․H. J. Cho and H. T. Lee. 2008. A Basic Study on Establishment of the Ecological Landscape Planning Model. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(4): 48-64.   과학기술학회마을
16 Robinson, L.․J. P. Newell and J.M. Marzluff 2005, Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 71(1): 51-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Yang, J․L. Zhao․J. Mcbride and P. Gong. 2009. Can you see green? Assessing the visibility of urban forests in cities. Landscape Urban Planning 91: 97-104.   DOI   ScienceOn