한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제42권1호
  • /
  • Pages.123-132
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수변 생태벨트 평가방법 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on Development of Evaluation Method on Riverine Ecobelt

  • 조용현 (공주대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 최대희 (공주대학교 대학원 조경학과)
  • Cho, Yong-Hyeon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kongju National University) ;
  • Choi, Dae-Hee (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.01.23
  • 심사 : 2013.02.11
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 수변 생태벨트를 조성, 보전, 관리를 위해 수변생태벨트의 진단적 평가방법을 개발하는 것이었다. 평가의 기본 틀은 일본의 제방림 평가방법을 토대로 하였으며, 국내 수변녹지의 현황에 맞게 수정한 1차 수정평가방법으로 1차 시험평가를 실시하였다. 1차 시험평가의 문제점을 보완한 2차 수정안을 가지고 전문가를 대상으로 설문을 실시하고, 그 결과를 반영하여 최종 평가방법을 제안하였다. 최종 평가방법으로 홍천강에서 시험평가를 실시하였다. 최종적으로 제안된 평가방법의 평가영역은 5가지 분야 19가지 항목으로 구성되었으며, 5가지 분야는 치수, 환경기능, 식물생장, 생태벨트기능, 복원잠재성 등이다. 치수분야 평가항목은 수림의 길이, 폭, 밀도 등 3가지 항목으로, 환경기능분야는 공원이용, 경관 경계 및 주연부, 미기후 조절, 비점오염 제어 등 4가지 항목으로, 식물생장분야는 종 구성, 수림 높이, 계층구조, 덩굴식물, 식물활력도, 후계목 생장 등 6가지 항목으로, 생태벨트기능 분야는 종적 연결성, 횡적 연결성, 하천내 수림 혹은 서식지, 제방상단 도로 등 4가지 항목으로, 마지막으로 복원잠재력분야는 지형, 인접 토지이용 등 2가지 항목으로 구성되었다. 점수체계는 1~4까지 부여되었으며, 최종 평가결과 등급체계는 우수한 1등급에서 가장 열악한 5등급까지 5등급으로 구분하였다. 각 분야별 항목별 가중치는 동일하게 하였으며, 분야별 점수 평균값을 다시 평균하여 최종 등급을 판정하는 것으로 하였다. 홍천강을 대상으로 적용된 평가방법은 각 구간의 수변 생태벨트 실태를 효과적으로 보여주었다.

This study aims to develop the diagnostic evaluation method of the riverine ecobelt for construction, conservation, and maintenance of the riverine ecobelt. The value indices in the proposed evaluation method are composed of total 5 fields and 19 elements. The 5 fields are flood control, environmental function, growth of plants, ecobelt function, and restoration potential. Flood control field is composed of total 3 elements such as length, width, and density of green area. Environmental function field is composed of 4 elements such as park use, landscape boundary and edge, microclimate control, non-point pollution control. Growth of plants field is composed of 6 elements such as species composition, forest height, stratum structure, vine plants, plant vitality, and succession of plants. Ecobelt function field is composed of 4 elements such as longitudinal connectivity, lateral connectivity, in-stream forest or habitat, roads on bank top. Restoration potential field is composed of 2 elements such as landform and land use of the immediate vicinity. The score system ranging 1~4 was adopted. The weighting parameters of elements were unified with each other. The final grade system ranging 1~5(1: very good~5: very bad) was adopted, and the final grade was evaluated by the mean values of each field. According to the test application of the diagnostic evaluation method of the riverine ecobelt, the final grades showed effectively the real condition of each site.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Research Center(2009) Development of Technology to Recreate Riverine Forest and Riverine Eco-belt, 2nd phase 1st year Report. pp.74-77.
  2. Bentrup, Gary(2008) Conservation Buffers.
  3. Cho, Yong-Hyeon(1997a) Development of an EvaluationMethod of Stream Naturalness for Ecological Restoration of River Corridor. Doctorate thesis. Seoul National University. Seoul.
  4. Cho, Yong-Hyeon(1997b) A study on evaluation method of stream naturalness for ecological restoration of stream corridors. Korean Journal of Landscape Architecture 25(2): 73-81.
  5. Choi, Ji-yong and Yu-jin Jeong(2000) Research on Construction and Management of Riparian Green Area for Water Quality Improvement. KEI Research Report.
  6. Choi, Ji-yong and Eun-sung Shin(2001) Research on Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in Urban Area. KEI Research Report.
  7. Chovanec, A., P. Jager, M. Jungwirth, V. Koller-Kreiml, O. Moog, S. Muhar and S. Schmutz(2000) The Austrian way of assessing the ecological integrity of running waters: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017079629534
  8. Fischer, R. A., C. O. Martin, J. T. Ratti and J. Guidice(2001) Riparian Terminology: Confusion and Clarification. EMRRP Technical Note Series, EMRRP-SR-25. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
  9. Fischer, Richard A. and J. Craig Fischenich(2000) Design Recommendations for Riparian Corridors and Vegetated Buffer Strips. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory.
  10. Fox, P. J. A., M. Naura and P. Scarlett(1998) An account of the derivation and testing of a standard field method, river habitat survey. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 455-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<455::AID-AQC284>3.0.CO;2-7
  11. Han-River Management Committee(2007) Management Master Plan for Riparian Zone in Han-river.
  12. Harper, D. and M. Everard(1998) Why should the habitat level approach underpin holistic river survey management? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<395::AID-AQC297>3.0.CO;2-X
  13. Jeong, Kyeong-jin(1996) A Study on Evaluation of River Naturalness Using GIS. Master's thesis. Kyeongwon University. Seongnam.
  14. Jo, Hyun-kil, Hyae-mi Park and Jin-young Kim(2012) A study on proper establishment of riparian greenspace: in the case of Nakdong and Sumjin.Yeongsan river. Proceedings of Autumn Conference of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 2012: 113-115.
  15. Kang, Hyeongsik, Young Sook Lee and Seung Hoon Jeon(2011) A study on the evaluation method of ecologically fragmented section for restoration of the riverine ecobelt. Journal of Civil Engineering 31(4B): 383-391.
  16. Kim, Hansu(2010) Study on the Establishment of Riparian Greenspace by Ecological Approach. Master's thesis. Kangwon National University. Chuncheon.
  17. Kim, Jaejun and Namchun Kim(2009) A Study on the Method of the Riparian Revegetation Techniques for the Riparian Areas Restoration : Focused on the Han-River Riparian Areas. Doctorate thesis. Dankook University. Seoul.
  18. Kwater(2005) River Bank Forest Maintenance Instruction.
  19. Ladson, A. R. and L. J. White(2000) Measuring stream condition. In S. Brizga and B. Finlayson (Eds.), River Management, The Australasian Experience (pp.265-285). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  20. Ladson, A. R., L. J. White, J. A. Doolan, B. L. Finlayson, B. T. Hart, P. S. Lake and J. W. Tilleard(1999) Development and testing of an index of stream condition for waterway management in Australia. Freshwater Biology 41: 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00442.x
  21. Lee, Dowon(2001) Landscape Ecology. Seoul National University Press.
  22. Ministry of Environment(2008) Survey and Evaluation of Aquatic Ecosystem Health.
  23. Ministry of Environment(2009) Research on Construction andManagement of Riverine Ecological Area(II).
  24. Muhar, S.(1996) Habitat improvement of Austrian rivers with regard to different spatial scales. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<471::AID-RRR403>3.0.CO;2-F
  25. Muhar, S. and M. Jungwirth(1998) Habitat integrity of running watersassessment criteria and their biological relevance. Hydrobiologia 386: 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003588631679
  26. Muhar, S. and M. Schwarz(2000) Assessing rivers with high and good habitat integrity in the Alpine region as foundation for conservation programmes:Applications inAustria. Verhandlungen InternationaleVereinigung Limnologie 27: 669-673.
  27. Newson, M. D.(2002) Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystemmanagement. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.532
  28. Palone, Roxane S. and Albert H. Todd(1998) Chesapeak Bay Riparian Handbook : A Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Riparian Forest Buffers. USDA.
  29. Park, Daehoon(2001) A Study on the Planning of Micro-Climate Control of Apartment House. Master's thesis. Konkuk University. Seoul.
  30. Parsons, M., M. Thomas and R. Norris(2002) Australian River Assessment System: Review of Physical River Assessment Methods. A Biological Perspective, Commonwealth of Australia and University of Canberra, Canberra, Monitoring River Heath Initiative Technical Report, 21.
  31. Raven, P. J., P. J. A. Fox, M. Everard, N. T. H. Holmes and F. D. Dawson(1997) River habitat survey: a new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality. In P. J. Boon and D. L. Howell (Eds.), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable. pp.215-234. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office Books.
  32. Raven, P. J., N. T. H. Holmes, P. Charrier, F. H. Dawson, M. Naura and P. J. Boon(2002) Towards a harmonized approach for hydromorphological assessment of rivers in Europe: a qualitative comparison of three survey methods. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.536
  33. Wilkinson, J., J. Martin, P. J. Boon and N. T. H. Holmes(1998) Convergence of field survey protocols for SERCON (System for Evaluating Rivers for Conservation) and RHS(River Habitat Survey). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 579-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<579::AID-AQC300>3.0.CO;2-7