The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회지)

Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relations Between Writing Ability of a Preschool Child and Functional Achievement Ability

취학 전 아동의 글씨쓰기와 기능적 과제수행과의 상관관계

  • Hwang, Hye-Jung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Park, Gyu-Ri (Yonsei Councelling Center) ;
  • Jin, Hwa-Jeong (Major in Elementary Art Education Graduate School of Education Busan National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong-Mi (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University)
  • 황혜정 (인제대학교 일산백병원 작업치료실) ;
  • 박규리 (연세아동청소년상담센터) ;
  • 진화정 (부산교육대학교 대학원 초등미술교육과) ;
  • 김경미 (인제대학교 의생명공학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.10
  • Accepted : 2014.12.08
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this research is to choose scissoring, handling chopsticks, wearing a jacket with buttons as a significant subject in order to understand relations between writing ability of a preschool child and functional achievement ability. Methods : The subjects are 66 preschool children under the age of 5. The research has conducted for 1 week by using writing test, scissoring, handling chopsticks, wearing a jacket with buttons as an indicator of valuation. We collected statistics by using program called SPSS WIN 14.0 for the process of analysis. Results : The score of writing ability which is one of the common characteristic of subject has a significant difference in terms of statistics according to the gender. the score of girls are higher($13.33{\pm}2.55$) than boys($11.92{\pm}2.52$). Writing ability has a significant relativity with the achievement ability of scissoring(r=0.244, p=0.048),handling chopsticks(r=0.403, p=0.001), achievement ability in terms of statistics. Conclusion : A significant difference between writing ability according common characteristics of children is showed based on the gender. writing ability has a significant relativity with the achievement ability of scissoring, handling chopsticks, achievement ability.

목적 : 일상생활과 관련된 가위질, 젓가락질, 단추 달린 상의 입기를 의미 있는 기능적 과제로 선정하고, 취학 전 아동의 글씨쓰기 수행과 기능적 과제수행과의 상관관계를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 연구 대상은 유치원에 재원중인 만 5세 아동, 총 66명을 대상으로 하였다. 글씨쓰기, 가위질, 젓가락질, 단추달린 상의입기 수행능력의 평가는 평가지표를 사용하여 약 1주일간 실시하였다. 분석 방법은 평가를 통해 얻어진 자료를 SPSS WIN 14.0 프로그램을 사용하여 통계처리 하였다. 연구결과 : 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성 중 성별에 따른 글씨쓰기 점수는 남자 $11.92{\pm}2.52$점, 여자 $13.33{\pm}2.55$점으로 통계학적으로 유의하게 여자 아동의 점수가 높았다(t=2.260, p=0.027). 글씨쓰기 능력은 가위질(r=0.244, p=0.048), 젓가락질(r =0.403, p=0.001) 수행 능력과 통계학적으로 유의한 관계가 있었다. 결론 : 아동의 일반적 특성에 따른 글씨쓰기 능력의 차이는 성별에 따라 유의한 차이가 있었다. 글씨쓰기 능력은 가위질, 젓가락질 수행 능력과 유의한 상관성이 있었으나, 단추달린 상의입기 수행 능력은 통계학적으로 유의한 상관성이 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 배영동. (1996). 한국 수저의 음식문화적 특성과 의의. 문화제, 29, 211-231.
  2. 서덕남. (2006). 인체 뇌에서 손의 운동 영역에 대한 f-MRI 연구. 석사학위논문, 경희대학교, 서울.
  3. 서은정. (2006). 일상활동기술 교수프로그램이 발달지체유아의 일상활동기술과 자발화 향상에 미치는 효과. 정서.행동장애연구, 22(1), 77-102.
  4. 윤혜경, 권오식. (1994). 한글의 음운부호화가 한글 지각에 미치는 효과에 관한 발달적 연구. 한국심리학회지, 7(1), 151-163.
  5. 이석순. (1998). 5, 6세 유아의 읽기, 쓰기 능력에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교, 서울.
  6. 전현일. (2004). 세계일보.
  7. 조선하. 우남희. (2004). 한국 유아의 창안적 글자쓰기발달 과정 분석. 한국유아교육학회, 24(1), 315-339.
  8. 차미자. (1993). 유아의 쓰기 경향에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교, 서울.
  9. 최승환. (2000). 초등학생의 읽기 오류분석. 석사학위논문, 고려대학교, 서울.
  10. 홍연림. (2000). 형제지위변인과 형제관계가 아동의 성격특성에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 숙명여자대학교, 서울.
  11. Alston, J., & Taylor, J. (1987). Handwriting: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Croom Helm.
  12. Amundson, P. L. (1983). Denver handwriting analysis. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publication.
  13. Amundson, S. J. (1995). Evaluation tool of dhildren's handwriting. Homer, AK: O.T. KIDS.
  14. Amundson, S. J. (2001). Prewriting and handwriting skills. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Children (4th ed., pp. 545-546). Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.
  15. Amundson, S. J. (2005). Prewriting and handwriting skills. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Children (5th ed., pp. 587-610). Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.
  16. Arris, R. C., & Christiaansen, R. (1986). Occupational therapist' use of media. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(10), 679-84. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.10.679
  17. Bergman, K. E., & McLaugh-lin, T. F. (1988). Remediating handwriting difficulties with learning disabled students: A review. Journal of Special Education, 12, 101-102.
  18. Bonney, M. A. (1992). Understanding and assessing handwriting difficulty: Perspectives from the literature. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 39(3), 7-15.
  19. Case-Smith, J. (2005). Use of standardized tests in pediatric practice. In P. K. Richardson (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for children (5th ed., pp 246-275). Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.
  20. Carlson, K., & Cunningham, J. (1990). Effect of pencil diameter on the graphomotor skill of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(90)90049-7
  21. Cornhill, H., & Case-Smith, J. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Jornal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732-739. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.50.9.732
  22. Davis, J. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2004) Occupational development. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation (pp. 91-119). UpperSaddle Tiver: N. J. Prentice Hall.
  23. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education John Dewey: The middle works. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
  24. Gardner, M. F. (1998). Test of handwriting skills. Hydesville, CA: Psychoolgical and Educational Publication.
  25. Gilfoyle, E. M., Grady, A. P., & Moore, J. C. (1996). Children Adapt. USA: Slack Inc.
  26. Humphry, R., & Wakeford, L. (2006). An occupationcentered discussion of development and implications for practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 258-267. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.3.258
  27. Johnson, D. J., & Carlisle, J. F. (1996). A study of handwriting in written stories of normal and learning disabled children. Reading and Writing, 8, 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00423924
  28. Leeper, S. H., Skipper, D. S., & Writerspoon, R. L. (1979). Good School for Young Children. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.
  29. Levine, M. D., Oberklaid, F., & Meltzer, L. (1981). Developmental output failure: A study of low productivity in school-aged children. Pediatrics, 67, 18-25.
  30. Maeland, A. F. (1992). Handwriting and perceptualmotor skills in clumsy, dysgraphic, and “normal” children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 1207-1217.
  31. McHale, K., & Cermak, S., (1992). Fine motor activities in elementary school: Preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(10), 898-903. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.10.898
  32. Missuiuna, C., Mallow-Miller, T., & Mandich, A. (1998). Mediational techniques: Origins and application to occupational therapy in paediatrics. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749806500405
  33. Phelps, J., Stempel, L., & Speck, G. (1984). The children's handwriting evaluation scale: A new diagnostic tool. Dallas, TX: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children.
  34. Phelps, J., & Stempel, L. (1987). The children's handwriting evaluation scale for manuscript writing. Dallas, TX: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children.
  35. Polatajko, H. J., Mandich, A. D., Missiuna, C., Miller, L. T., Macnab, J., & Malloy-Miller, T. (2001). Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance(CO-OP). Part 3. The protocol in brief. Physical and Occupational Theraphy in Pediatrics, 20, 107-123.
  36. Reisman, J. (1999). Minnesota handwriting test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  37. Rubin, N., & Henderson, S. E. (1982). Two sides of the same coin: Variations in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. Special Education: Forward Trends, 9, 17-24.
  38. Sovik, N. (1993). Developmental cybernetics of handwriting and graphic behavior. Oslo. Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
  39. Tsen, M. H., & Cermak, S. A. (1993). The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(10), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.10.919
  40. Tseng, M. H., & Chow, S. M. (2000). Perceptualmotor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.1.83
  41. Tseng, M. H., & Murray, E. A., (1994). Differences in perceptualmotor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929401400102
  42. Una, P. H., & Jean-Paul, D. (1996). Invented spelling: An indicator of differential problem-solving strategies of good spellers and poor spellers at kindergarten and grade one. New York: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association.
  43. Weil, M. J., & Amundson, S. J. C. (1994). Relationship between visuomotor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(11), 982-988. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.48.11.982
  44. Ziviani, J., & Hayes, A. (1990). Chant D. Handwriting: A perceptual motor disturbance in children with myelomeningocele. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929001000103