DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of Differences between Importance and Performance of Forest Interpreter Training Programs using the IPA Method

IPA 기법을 활용한 숲해설가 직무교육프로그램에 대한 중요도와 성취도 차이분석

  • Choi, Il-Sun (Forest Welfare Division, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Ha, Si-Yeon (Forest Welfare Division, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Son, Ji-Won (Forest Welfare Division, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 최일선 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과) ;
  • 하시연 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과) ;
  • 손지원 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과)
  • Received : 2014.06.25
  • Accepted : 2014.08.28
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

This study analysed differences between importance and performance of 2014 forest interpreter training program through IPA with the aim to provide suggestions and improvement. First the results of a comparison of the overall average of performance and importance showed importance is higher than performance. Afterwards, the result of IPA showed that confidence of being an interpreter, active involvement, the understanding of the value of forest, expansion of the understanding of forest, the understanding of the mission of interpreter, and the understanding of the qualification of interpreter, those 6 items belong to the I quadrant. In the case of the II quadrant there were interest of the content of education and to learn a lot of things through education. Next, those how to deal with service, planning interpreter programs, clarity of the content of education, accuracy of the content of education, validity of the content of education, appropriate number of participants, and appropriate time of education involved in III quadrant. Finally, concentration in the education and the understanding of the topic of education situated in IV quadrant.

본 연구는 2014년 숲해설가 직무교육프로그램을 대상으로 중요도와 성취도 분석(IPA)을 이용하여 직무교육프로그램을 평가하고 문제점 및 향후방안에 대한 시사점 제공을 목적으로 이루어졌다. 먼저 숲해설가 직무교육프로그램 중요도와 성취도의 전체평균을 비교한 결과 중요도가 성취도보다 높게 나타났다. IPA 분석을 실시한 결과 I 사분면에 해당하는 항목은 해설가로서의 자신감, 적극적 참여, 숲의 가치를 깨달음, 숲에 대한 이해의 폭 고양, 해설가의 임무 이해, 해설가의 자질 이해로 6개 항목이었으며, II 사분면에 해당하는 항목은 교육내용의 흥미성과 교육을 통하여 많은 것을 배우는 것으로 2개의 변수가 추출되었다. 다음으로 III 사분면에 해당하는 항목은 서비스 대처방법, 해설프로그램 직접기획, 교육내용의 명료성, 교육내용의 정확성, 교육내용의 타당성, 적절한 규모의 학생 수, 적당한 교육시간으로 7개 항목이었으며 마지막으로 IV 사분면에 해당하는 항목은 교육내용 청취시의 집중력, 교육주제에 대한 이해로 2개의 항목이 추출되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. An, H.G., Park, D.H., and Jang, B.J. 2011. An exploratory study on the curriculum development for medical tourism experts. Northeast Asia Tourism Research 7(4):169-185.
  2. An, H.J. 2004. Development of evaluative measurement for interpretation program on cultural tourism destination. Hanyang University.
  3. Cho, K.M., Kown, I.K., and Kim, H.R. 2013. Itentification of differences between importance and satisfaction of adolescent's outdoor sportswear brand selection attributes using the IPA method. The Korean Journal of Physical Education 52(5): 437-449.
  4. Choi, E.H. 2012. A survey awareness on instructional competencies of cyber education for elementary and middle school using an Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA): Kyounggido Cyber Home Learning participating teacher target. CNU Journal of Educational Studies 33(1): 187-210.
  5. Ha, S.Y. 2006. Study on programs of forest interpreter's training courses. Seoul University.
  6. Ha, S.Y. and Kim, I.H. 2006. Job analysis of the Forest Interpreters based on the DACUM Method. The Environmental Education 19(3): 57-66.
  7. Jo, H.J. and Kim, S.Y. (2013). Analysis on job training courses according to educational needs of the job competency for new directors of childcare centers. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education 18(2): 199-220.
  8. Jo, I.S. and Kim, K.H. 2012. Study on tourists intention on revisitation using IPA technique: focused on Jeonju Hanok Village. Journal of Business Education 27(1): 258-278.
  9. Kim, B.S. 2011. IPA analysis on the users' attribute of National Recreation Forest Service Program. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 20(6): 721-728. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.6.721
  10. Kim, N.J. 2005. The evaluation of Heritage Interpreters' education program using Importance-Performance Analysis. Korean Journal of Tourism Research 20(2): 307-324.
  11. Kim, S.H., Kim, S., Seo, M., and Yang, G. 2009. Development of standards for meta evaluation. Journal of Educational Evaluation 22(3): 557-585.
  12. Kim, W.K. 2011. The suitability structure model of CSR activities and IPA Matrix analysis on consumers of professional baseball team. Kyunghee University.
  13. Ko, D.H. and Shin, W.S. 2011. Forest Interpreter's satisfaction and needs of job competency education. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 15(3): 1-70.
  14. Korea Forest Service 2013. Comprehensive plan of forest education (internal information).
  15. Lee, B.I., and Lee, J.H. 2008. A study on the analysis of early childhood special education teachers' perceptions and needs about in service programs. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 8(2): 117-149.
  16. Lee, W.S. 2013. Why do we evaluate a program?. Journal of Educational Evaluation 26(1): 1-13.
  17. Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Hinterhuber, H., Renzl, B., and Pichler, J. 2004. The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management 33: 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00055-5
  18. Oh, H. 2001. Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management 22: 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00036-X
  19. Park, S.H. 1996. A study on the evaluation of tourism interpretation. Collection of Dissertation of Kyonggi University.
  20. Park, S.H. 2001. I can be a tourism resource interpreter. Seoul, Packsan.
  21. Park, S.H., Shin, C.S., Yeon, P.S., Ha, S.Y., and Son, J.W. 2013. The participated motivation of the forest interpreters and the satisfaction analysis of the job training process. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 17(3): 11-18.
  22. Yoo, D.K., Ju, M.J., Kim, M.S., and Lee, Y.K. 2013. Determinants of franchisor dissatisfaction in food service Industry: Focused on revised IPA. Academy of customer satisfaction management 15(4): 123-140.

Cited by

  1. Development of a Job Model for Environmental Education Personnel vol.28, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17965/kjee.2015.28.3.163
  2. Visitors’ Perception on Night Scape in Recreation Forest - Focus on Visitors on the Chilbosan Recreation Forest - vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2016.20.1.008
  3. Comparative Analysis of Importance and Performance of Plant Interpretive Content Using IPA Analysis vol.29, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17965/kjee.2016.29.3.286
  4. A study on the gap between knowing the character strengths and virtues of toddler and young children using Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA) vol.36, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2016.36.6.017
  5. 의료기관 사회적 책임(HSR)활동의 IPA 평가 vol.12, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2018.12.4.001
  6. Educational needs related to elder abuse among undergraduate nursing students in Korea: An importance-performance analysis vol.104, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104975