DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Optimal Shock Intensity and C-arm Total Running Time in Patients with Inferior Ureter Stones during Electromagnetic of ESWL

전자기식 체외충격파쇄석술시 하부요관 결석 환자에 대해 적합한 충격강도와 C-arm 총 가동시간

  • Park, Jeong Kyu (Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Cho, Euy Hyun (Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Graduate School Yeungnam University)
  • 박정규 (대구보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 조의현 (영남대학교 대학원 의공학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.05
  • Accepted : 2014.12.25
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

The advantages and disadvantages of the various models of crushed ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy) and their various side effects due to pre-treatment have been reported. We look for the appropriate intensity of the shock wave in the electromagnetic ESWL treatment of patients with lower Inferior Ureter Stones and measure the total running time of C-arm saw. This study is based on the January-June 2014 launch of 65 patients of C university hospital located in Gyeongbuk, who conducted ESWL without pre-treatment. Patients are composed of 48 male and 17 female which were more common in men, while the most common age is 50s. The occurrence of lower urinary tract stones were left and they were more absent than 5mm in size in 39 of the most common. Optimal intensity is one of the suitable intensity of pain, and it is possible to switch the strength of impact to C if one appeals pain. In addition, the C-arm of the total operating time showed $241.73{\pm}30.37$ seconds, which is the size of the lower urinary tract that showed a significant difference (p <0.05). Therefore, ESWL treatment without pre-enforce treatment, the standard for the impact frequency and impact strength depending on the site of ureteral stones is required. The standard for total operating time of C-arm generated for ureteral stones is needed in order to reduce radiation exposure, and the standard for the total operating time for the criteria is needed depending on the site in order to minimize the exposure.

체외 충격파 쇄석술시 쇄석기종에 따라 각각 장단점이 있으며, 전 처치로 인한 여러 가지 부작용이 보고되고 있다. 이에 전자기식 ESWL시 하부결석환자에서 적합한 충격파의 강도를 찾아보고, C-arm의 총 가동시간을 측정해 보았다. 본 연구는 2014년 1월부터 6월까지 경북지역 일개시의 C대학병원에서 전 처치를 시행하지 않고 ESWL을 받은 65명의 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 성비는 남자가 48명, 여자가 17명으로 남자가 더 많았으며, 연령은 50대가 가장 많았다. 하부요로결석의 발생은 왼쪽이 더 많았으며, 결석의 크기는 5mm 이하가 39명으로 가장 많았다. 적합한 충격강도는 1의 강도이며 통증을 호소하는 경우 C의 강도로 전환하여 충격을 가할 수 있다. 또한 C-arm의 총 가동시간은 $241.73{\pm}30.37$초로 나타났으며, 이것은 하부요로결석의 크기와 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 따라서, ESWL시 전처치를 시행하지 않고 시술을 할 경우 요관 결석의 부위에 따라 적합한 충격강도와 충격빈도의 기준이 필요로 하며, C-arm 총 가동시간도 요관 결석의 발생부위에 따라 방사선으로 인한 피폭을 최소화하기 위한 총 가동시간에 대한 기준이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. J.Y.Shin, B.S.Shim, H.N.Yoon, "The Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for Mid-ureter Stone", Korean Journal of Urology, Vol.44, No.12, pp.1273-1276, 2003
  2. Yong-Uk Kwon, Sang-Ik Lee, Tae-Yoong Jeong "Treatment of Upper and Mid Ureter Stones: Comparison of Semirigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy with Holmium: YAG Laser and Shock Wave Lithotripsy", Korean Journal of Urology, Vol.48, No. 2, pp.171-175, 2005 https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2007.48.2.171
  3. Kwangsoo Kang, SangbokLee, Junhaeng Lee, "Take advantage of ESWL in comparison measurement of Proximal stone against Mid Ureteral Stone according to its provability of pulverization, The Korean Society of Radiology, Vol.4 No1, pp11-17, 2010
  4. Dong Wook Yu, Ill Young Seo, Joung Sik Rim, "Comparative Results of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripters with Three Kinds of Shock Wave Generator", Korean Journal of Urology, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 48-54, 2007 https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2007.48.1.54
  5. Tae Gyun Na, "Evaluation for Acceptability of Analgegic-free Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy with Modulith SLK", School of Medicine Graduate School, Eulji University, 2006
  6. Jong YEON Lee, "Evaluation of the optimal frequency and pretreatment of shockwaves in patients with renal stones during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)", School of Medicine Graduate School, Chung-Ang University, 2011
  7. Kyong Hun Kim, Bong Suk Shim "The Comparison of Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Removal and Shockwave Lithotripsy in Lower Ureteral Stones", Korean Journal of Urology, Vol.42, No.9, pp.905-909, 2001
  8. Doo Seung-Whan "Scattered Radiation Doses to the Patients and Medical Practitioneer from Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy", Korean Journal of Urology, Vol.49, No.2, pp.155-159, Feb, 2008 https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2008.49.2.155
  9. Dornier MedTech GmbH, Compact Delta II: Treatment Guidelines 2003
  10. Sung-Ho Moon, Hong-Ryang Jung, Cheong-Hwan Lim, "Radiation Dose during Fluoroscopy at the Organ from Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy", Journal of Korea Contents Association Vol.10, No.5, pp.343-350, Feb, 2010 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.5.343
  11. Seven G, Schreiner MA, Ross AS, Lin OS, Gluck M, Gan SI, et al. Long-term outcomes associated with pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for chronic calcific pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75 pp.997-1004. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.014
  12. Joo-Hee Kim, "Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of pancreatic duct stones" School of Medicine Graduate School, Ul-San University 2013.