DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

아파트 공동체 주민참여의 사회관계 분석 - 서울특별시 거주자를 중심으로 -

Analysis of the Social Relationship of Apartment Community Residents' Participation - Focused on Residents in Seoul City -

  • 김해숙 (강원대학교 대학원 부동산학전공) ;
  • 정복환 (명지대학교 부동산학과) ;
  • 이재성 (동국대학교 대학원 공법전공)
  • 투고 : 2014.10.06
  • 심사 : 2014.12.10
  • 발행 : 2014.12.25

초록

The purpose of this study was to identify a direction for increase of resident participation by analyzing the social relations of resident participation. In the research method, the method of statistical analysis was added to the legal institutional method. As a result, the following findings were obtained: First, it is very important that the resident representative meeting at the center of the participation of the resident organization should take the role in and responsibility for the promotion of participation. Second, it is necessary to have smooth communication with voluntary groups such as women's association or club forming the coordinating group. Third, Among other things, it is judged that residents should have an active will to participate and practice in order to promote their participation in the apartment community. The above results imply that participation should be promoted by enabling residents to perform four functions of resident participation. Accordingly, the promotion of participation based on the function of participation is very necessary and important.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김용학 (2011). 사회연결망분석 중판, 서울: 박영사.
  2. 김찬동.박은철 (2010). 아파트 관리의 공공성 제고방안. 서울: 서울시정개발연구원. 55-74.
  3. 방경식.장희순 (2011). 부동산학총론 제2판, 서울: 부연사, 130.
  4. 서울특별시 (2013). 2013년 통계자료.
  5. 서울특별시 (2014). 서울시 기본계획 2020, [표 III-3] 생활권구분. 104.
  6. 손동원 (2010). 사회 네트워크 분석 초판 4쇄, 서울: 경문사.
  7. 영화배우 김부선(김근희). 난방비 비리폭로 사건. 2014년 9월 12일.
  8. 이명진.채성진.권승준.오유교.김정환 (2013). 댁의 아파트 관리비 새고 있진 않나요<1-13>. 조선일보. 2013. 5. 6.-5. 30.
  9. 이승종.김혜정 (2011). 시민참여론 서울: 박영사.
  10. 장성수 (2013년 5월 21일). 이슈기고. 조선일보. 36.
  11. 정정길 (1994). 정책학원론. 서울: 대명출판사, 138-139.
  12. 천현숙.은난순.지은영.채혜원 (2013). 공동주택 커뮤니티 활성화 지원과 평가방안. 국토연구원(KRIHS), 9-11.
  13. 최창호.강형기 (2014). 지방자치학. 서울: 삼영사.
  14. 헤럴드경제.현대경제연구원 (2014). 공동체와 사회자본 관련 대국민 인식조사 보고서, 6.
  15. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 56.
  16. Chaffee, S. H., & McLeod, J. M. (1973). Interpersonal Approaches to Communication Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 469-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402
  17. Ha, J. B., & Kil, J. B. (2013). An Analysis on the Impact Factors of Citizen Participation: Focused on Interest, Institutions, and Ideology. Journal of the Korea Institute of Governance, 20(3), Korea Institute of Governance, 249-274. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2013.20.3.010
  18. Jeong, B. H., & Bang, K. S. (2011). Social Relations of Information Providers in the Housing Redevelopment Project. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Academy Review, 47, 249-274.
  19. Jeong, B, H. (2013). The Rights of the Housing Tenant within the Housing Redevelopment Project District, - Focused on the Housing Tenant's Information Acquisition-. Doctoral Dissertation of Real Estate Studies, Graduate School of Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si.
  20. Lee, R. Y. (2010). A Casual Analysis on the Sense of Community in Apartment Complex. Collected Papers of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(7) (Serial Number 261), 193-201.
  21. Na, G. S. (2014). A Study on the Development Plan of the Delegation of Occupiers as citizen autonomy organization: -Focused on the case of the Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea-. Doctoral dissertation of public administration, Graduate School of Dongkuk University, Seoul.
  22. Shin, H. K., Lee, S. J., & Jo, I. S. (2011). A Case Study on the Residents' Sense of Community and the Needs and Satisfaction of Community Facilities in Apartment Complex. Journal of the Korean Home Management Association, 29(1), 83-93.
  23. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application. NY: Cambridge University Press.