DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implant Fixture Installation in the Posterior Maxilla Using a Tooth-supported Surgical Template Based on Computer Assisted Treatment Planning

컴퓨터 보조 기반 치아 지지 서지컬 템프레이트를 이용한 상악구치부 임플란트 식립

  • Kim, Soung Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jee Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 김성민 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이지호 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.02.28
  • Accepted : 2013.11.26
  • Published : 2013.11.30

Abstract

Two patients with partial edentulous maxilla were scheduled to undergo installation of implant fixtures using a tooth-supported surgical template based on computer assisted treatment planning. After 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic scanning was transferred to the OnDemand3D (Cybermed Co., Seoul, Korea) software program for virtual planning, fixtures of MK III Groovy RP implant of the Br${\aa}$nemark System (Nobel Biocare AB Co., G$\ddot{o}$teborg, Sweden) was installed using the In2Guide (CyberMed Co., Seoul, Korea) tooth-supported surgical template with a Quick Guide Kit (Osstem Implant Co., Seoul, Korea) system in the posterior maxilla of each patient. Sinus floor elevation with a xenogenic bone graft procedure was also performed simultaneously in one patient. Fixture installations were completed successfully without complications, such as sinus mucosa perforation, bony bleedings, fenestrations, or others. During the last two-year follow-up period after prosthetics delivery, each implant was found to be fine with no other minor complications. The entire procedures are reported and the literatures on use of tooth-supported surgical template was reviewed.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH, et al. Case analysis of implant fixture installation in the posterior mandible by using of surgical template. J Korean Acad Implant Dent 2010;29:26-32.
  2. Lee JH, Kim SM, Paeng JY, Kim MJ. Implant surgery based on computer simulation surgical stent and the assessment with the image fusion technique. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:402-7. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.5.402
  3. Lee JH, Kim SM, Kim MJ, et al. Implant fixture installation in the anterior mandible by use of a mucosa supported surgical template based on computer assisted treatment planning. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;33:158-65.
  4. Lee JA, Kim NH, Kim SM. Basic glossary and review of the surgical guide in computer assisted implant dentistry II. Dental Success 2011;31:420-3.
  5. Kim NH, Kim SM. Computer technology application in surgical implant dentistry: a systemic review I. Dental Success 2011;31:91-8.
  6. Lee JH, Kim MJ, Kim SM, Kwon OH, Kim YK. The 3D CT superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessement of oral and maxillofacial surgery tretment results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:167-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.06.003
  7. Laney WR, editor. Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants. Quintessence Publishing Co.: Berlin; 2007.
  8. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
  9. Tahmaseb A, De Clerck R, Wismeijer D. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:541-6.
  10. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:92-109.
  11. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76:503-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503
  12. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer- guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x
  13. Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J, Kübler AC, Zoller JE. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9:23-35.
  14. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:305-13.
  15. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7.
  16. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography- derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033
  17. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008;79:1339-45. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080059
  18. Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, et al. Accuracy of CAD/CAMguided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:334-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60072-8