Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2013.35.6.381

Implant Fixture Installation in the Posterior Maxilla Using a Tooth-supported Surgical Template Based on Computer Assisted Treatment Planning  

Kim, Soung Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Myung Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jee Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jong Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Myung Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.35, no.6, 2013 , pp. 381-389 More about this Journal
Abstract
Two patients with partial edentulous maxilla were scheduled to undergo installation of implant fixtures using a tooth-supported surgical template based on computer assisted treatment planning. After 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic scanning was transferred to the OnDemand3D (Cybermed Co., Seoul, Korea) software program for virtual planning, fixtures of MK III Groovy RP implant of the Br${\aa}$nemark System (Nobel Biocare AB Co., G$\ddot{o}$teborg, Sweden) was installed using the In2Guide (CyberMed Co., Seoul, Korea) tooth-supported surgical template with a Quick Guide Kit (Osstem Implant Co., Seoul, Korea) system in the posterior maxilla of each patient. Sinus floor elevation with a xenogenic bone graft procedure was also performed simultaneously in one patient. Fixture installations were completed successfully without complications, such as sinus mucosa perforation, bony bleedings, fenestrations, or others. During the last two-year follow-up period after prosthetics delivery, each implant was found to be fine with no other minor complications. The entire procedures are reported and the literatures on use of tooth-supported surgical template was reviewed.
Keywords
Angular deviation; Computer assisted treatment planning; Linear deviation; Tooth-supported surgical template; Virtual planning;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH, et al. Case analysis of implant fixture installation in the posterior mandible by using of surgical template. J Korean Acad Implant Dent 2010;29:26-32.
2 Lee JH, Kim SM, Paeng JY, Kim MJ. Implant surgery based on computer simulation surgical stent and the assessment with the image fusion technique. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:402-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lee JH, Kim SM, Kim MJ, et al. Implant fixture installation in the anterior mandible by use of a mucosa supported surgical template based on computer assisted treatment planning. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;33:158-65.   과학기술학회마을
4 Lee JA, Kim NH, Kim SM. Basic glossary and review of the surgical guide in computer assisted implant dentistry II. Dental Success 2011;31:420-3.
5 Kim NH, Kim SM. Computer technology application in surgical implant dentistry: a systemic review I. Dental Success 2011;31:91-8.
6 Lee JH, Kim MJ, Kim SM, Kwon OH, Kim YK. The 3D CT superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessement of oral and maxillofacial surgery tretment results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:167-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Laney WR, editor. Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants. Quintessence Publishing Co.: Berlin; 2007.
8 Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
9 Tahmaseb A, De Clerck R, Wismeijer D. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:541-6.
10 Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:92-109.
11 Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76:503-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer- guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:73-86.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J, Kübler AC, Zoller JE. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9:23-35.
14 Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008;79:1339-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:305-13.
16 Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7.
17 Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography- derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:394-401.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, et al. Accuracy of CAD/CAMguided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:334-42.   DOI   ScienceOn