대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제51권4호
  • /
  • Pages.261-268
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

납형의 크기와 형태가 티타늄의 주조성에 미치는 영향

Effect of different pattern size and pattern shape on castability of commercially pure titanium

  • 서윤정 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 오계정 (전남대학교 미래형생체부품소재 RIS사업단) ;
  • 이효일 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 신유진 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 김홍주 (대전 선치과병원 보철센터) ;
  • 박상원 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실)
  • Seo, Yoon-Jeong (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Gye-Jeong (RIS Foundation for Advanced Biomaterials, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Il (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Yoo-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Hong-Joo (Prosthodontic Clinic, Daejeon Sun Dental Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.08.08
  • 심사 : 2013.09.16
  • 발행 : 2013.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 목적: 본 연구는 납형의 크기 및 형태 변화가 티타늄의 주조성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 확인하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 납형의 크기에 따라 Small Pattern군과 Large Pattern군으로 나누었고, 각각 Flat, Semicircular, Horse-shoe 및 V-shape형으로 납형의 형태에 따라 4개의 하위군으로 나누어 총 8개의 군으로 분류하였다. 모든 납형의 주입선은 Runner-bar형으로 하였다. 티타늄 주조 전용 매몰재인 실리카계 매몰재(Rematitan Plus$^{(R)}$, Dentarum, Germany)를 이용하여 매몰하였고, 아크용융 방식의 원심 주조기(Ti Cast Super R$^{(R)}$, Selec, Japan)를 사용하여 주조하였다. 주조성 평가는 완전한 형태로 주조 된 격자의 개수를 척도로 재현 정도를 확인하였다. 통계처리는 SPSS ver. 19.0 for WIN (SPSS. Inc. Chicago, IL, USA)를 사용하였다. 납형의 크기 및 형태에 따른 티타늄의 주조성을 이원변량 분산분석(Two-way ANOVA)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과:납형의 평균 재현율은 Small Pattern군은 95.14%, Large Pattern군은 94.30%로 Small Pattern군의 주조성이 유의하게 높았다(P<.05). 납형의 형태 변화에 따른 주조성은 Small Pattern군에서 Semicircular군 133.20개(96.52%), Horse-shoe군 132.40개(95.94%), Flat군 132.00개(95.65%), V-shape군 127.60개(92.46%) 순으로 감소하였다. Large Pattern군은 Flat군 198.60개(95.94%), V-shape군 197.80개(95.56%), Semicircular군 196.40개(94.88%), Horse-shoe군 188.00개(90.82%)순으로 감소하였다. Small Pattern군과 Large Pattern군 모두에서 납형의 형태변화에 따른 주조성은 유의할 만한 차이를 보이지 않았다(P>.05). 결론:주조체의 크기가 작을수록 주조성이 높아짐을 알 수 있었고 형태에 따른 주조성에서는 큰 영향을 받지 않는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of geometrically different wax pattern shapes and sizes on the castability of Grade2 Cp-Ti (commercially pure titanium). Materials and methods: Total of 40 mesh wax pattern ($61mm{\times}24mm$, 207 grids), ($61mm{\times}17mm$, 138 grids) was cast in this experiment. Depending on the geometrical shape of the wax pattern, 8 groups was organized; Flat, Semicircular, Horse-shoe and V-shape, each consisting 5 samples. Runner-bar sprue was used in all patterns. The number of completely cast grid in wax pattern served as a measure for the castability of comercially pure titanium. Results: The mean value of square count in each group was as followed; 133.20 squares in group SS (96.52%), 132.40 squares in group SH (95.94%), 132.00 squares in group SF (95.65%), 127.60 squares in SV (91.43%), 198.60 squares in group LF (95.94%), 197.80 squares in group LV (95.56%), 196.40 squares in group LS (94.88%), and 188.00 squares in group LH (90.82%). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study the results indicate that there were no sttistically significant difference in castability of titanium regarding wax pattern shape (P>.05). However, Small size wax patterns were showing the noticeable castability more than Large size pattern.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hansson HA, Albrektsson T, Branemark PI. Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90175-0
  2. Parr GR, Gardner LK, Toth RW. Titanium: the mystery metal of implant dentistry. Dental materials aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:410-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90562-1
  3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
  4. Bessing C, Bergman M. The castability of unalloyed titanium in three different casting machines. Swed Dent J 1992;16:109-13.
  5. Mori T, Jean-Louis M, Yabugami M, Togaya T. The effect of investment type on the fit of cast titanium crowns. Aust Dent J 1994;39:348-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1994.tb03104.x
  6. Okabe T, Hero H. The use of titanium in dentistry. Cell Mater 1995;87:211-30.
  7. Cho LR, Yi YJ, Park CJ. The effects of spure and invents on the casting accuracy and porosity of Ti-Ni castings. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:342-50.
  8. Park JK, Jeong CM, Jeon YC. The effect of sprue design on the marginal reproducibility of cast titanium crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:344-51.
  9. Kim ST, Vang MS, Yang HS, Park SW, Park HO, Lim HP. The effect of casting machine and investment on the castability of titanium. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:522-33.
  10. Burnett CA, Maguire H. Sprue design in removable partial denture casting. J Dent 1996;24:99-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00050-X
  11. Chai TI, Stein RS. Porosity and accuracy of multiple-unit titanium castings. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:534-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80112-X
  12. Chan D, Guillory V, Blackman R, Chung KH. The effects of sprue design on the roughness and porosity of titanium castings. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70048-9
  13. Takahashi J, Zhang JZ, Okazaki M. Effect of casting methods on castability of pure titanium. Dent Mater J 1993;12:245-52. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.12.245
  14. Kusakari H, Ozaki Y, Hoshino H. Cast titanium crown-for a better fitness and less porosity [in Janpanes]. Quintessence. Dent Technol 1998;23:17-23.
  15. DeWald E. The relationship of pattern position to the flow of gold and casting completeness. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:531-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90087-8
  16. Blackman R, Barghi N, Tran C. Dimensional changes in casting titanium removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:309-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90181-U
  17. Bridgeman JT, Marker VA, Hummel SK, Benson BW, Pace LL. Comparison of titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial denture clasps. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70124-0
  18. Watanabe K, Okawa S, Miyakawa O, Nakano S, Honma H, Shiokawa N, Kobayashi M. Relationship between titanium flow and casting contamination caused by mold materials. J Dent Mater 1992;11:662-71.
  19. Watanabe I, Woldu M, Watanabe K, Okabe T. Effect of casting method on castability of titanium and dental alloys. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:547-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008972018025
  20. Baltag I, Watanabe K, Miyakawa O. Internal porosity of cast titanium removable partial dentures: influence of sprue direction and diameter on porosity in simplified circumferential clasps. Dent Mater 2005;21:530-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.017
  21. Her H, Syverud M, Waarli M. Mold filling and porosity in castings of titanium. Dent Mater 1993;9:15-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90098-B
  22. Syverud M, Her H. Mold filling of Ti castings using investments with different gas permeability. Dent Mater 1995;11:14-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80003-4
  23. Heo SM, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS, Jeong HC. The effect of sprue design on the internal porosity of titanium castings. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:147-56.
  24. Love LD. Sprue design to minimize casting defects in base-metal castings. Quintessence Dent Technol 1987;11:195-7.
  25. Matin KA, Manderson RD. The influence of sprue design on cobalt chromium alloy casting defects. J Dent 1984;12:175-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(84)90052-6
  26. Wu M, Wagner I, Sahm PR, Augthun M. Numerical simulation of the casting process of titanium removable partial denture frameworks. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:301-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014067019169
  27. Wu M, Augthun M, Wagner I, Sahm PR, Spiekermann H. Numerical simulation of the casting process of titanium tooth crowns and bridges. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:485-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011207326961
  28. Watanabe K. Merit and demerit of runner bar for crown-bridge titanium casting-sink vortex causes internal defects [in Japanese]. Quintessence Dent Technol 1999;24:19-25.
  29. Chan DC, Blackman R, Kaiser DA, Chung K. The effect of sprue design on the marginal accuracy of titanium castings. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:424-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00268.x
  30. Ryge G, Kozak SF, Fairhurst CW. Porosities in dental gold castings. J Am Dent Assoc 1957;54:746-54. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1957.0125
  31. Blackman R, Barghi N, Tran C. Dimensional changes in casting titanium removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:309-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90181-U
  32. Andersson M, Bergman B, Bessing C, Ericson G, Lundquist P, Nilson H. Clinical results with titanium crowns fabricated with machine duplication and spark erosion. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:279-86. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358909007713
  33. Hruska AR, Borelli P. Quality criteria for pure titanium casting, laboratory soldering, intraoral welding, and a device to aid in making uncontaminated castings. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:561-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90524-Z
  34. Syverud M, Okabe T, Hero H. Casting of Ti-6Al-4V alloy compared with pure Ti in an Ar-arc casting machine. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:327-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00034.x
  35. Watanabe K, Okawa S, Miyakawa O, Nakano S, Shiokawa N, Kobayashi M. Molten titanium flow in a mesh cavity by the flow visualization technique. Dent Mater J 1991;10:128-37. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.10.128
  36. Chung DW, Yang HS. The effect of casting machine and investment on the castability of titanium alloy. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:654-64.
  37. al-Mesmar HS, Morgano SM, Mark LE. Investigation of the effect of three sprue designs on the porosity and the completeness of titanium cast removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70126-5
  38. Compagni R, Faucher RR, Yuodelis RA. Effects of sprue design, casting machine, and heat source on casting porosity. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:41-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90179-3
  39. Vidovic Y, Chung HG, Mori T. Enhancement of a titanium denture frame model: mold temperature and spruing factors. Dent Mater J 1995;14:256-62. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.14.256
  40. Preston JD, Berger R. Some laboratory variables affecting ceramo-metal alloys. Dent Clin North Am 1977;21:717-28.