한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information)

  • 제18권9호
  • /
  • Pages.139-152
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-849X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9945(eISSN)
한국컴퓨터정보학회 (Korean Society of Computer Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업의 디지털 평판 측정 기법 연구

A Study upon Online Measurement techniques of Corporate Reputation

  • 김승희 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원 산업정보시스템전공, 한국토지주택공사 경영정보처) ;
  • 김우제 (서울과학기술대학교 기술경영융합대학 글로벌융합산업공학과) ;
  • 이광석 (서울과학기술대학교 디지털문화정책학과)
  • Kim, Seung-Hee (Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Je (School of Global Convergence of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Seok (School of Digital Cultural policy, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.05
  • 심사 : 2013.08.19
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

SNS의 증가로 기업의 평판이 영업과 주가에 영향을 미치고 있다는 다양한 연구가 발표되고 있으나, 디지털 상에서 기업 평판 측정 방법과 관련한 연구는 상대적으로 미흡하다. 본 연구는 사전 연구 집대성을 통해 기업의 디지털 평판 정보를 기업 정체성 정보와 기업 인지 정보로 구분하고, 정체성 평가를 위해 (1)제품 및 서비스 질 (2)고용환경 (3)기업 비전 (4)사회적 책임 (5)경영 성과 5개 항목을, 인지 평가를 위해 (1)호감(선(善)) (2)능력(능(能)) (3)진취성(흥(興)) (4)세련(격(格)) (5)무정함(권(權)) (6)비공식성 6개 항목으로 구분하여 평판 검색용 워드 아이템(Word Item)을 추출하고 설문을 통해 빈도 분석을 실시하여 기업의 평판 측정값을 계량화 하는 방법을 고안하였다. 또한 이의 검증을 위하여 상용 평판 서비스를 활용하여 국내 SI 3사의 평판을 측정하였다. 본 연구는 기업의 정체성과 인지(이미지나 소통)를 세분화하여 기업의 평판 측정을 시도한 최초의 연구이며, 빈도 분석을 통해 검증된 워드 아이템을 활용하여 평판 점수로 측정하는 산식을 제안함으로써 업무 적용성을 높였다는데 그 의의가 있다.

Although a series of studies shows the fact that a company's reputation could affect its sales rate and stock price, due to the increased use of SNS, the research related to the online measurement method for the corporate reputation has been relatively insufficient. This study explores a design for a method to quantify the corporate reputation value by reconstructing the discussions in literature review. Concretely, this study divides the corporate reputation value into the corporate identity information and the corporate awareness information, which includes the following five sub-categories: (1) the quality of product and service; (2) the employment environment; (3) the corporate vision; (4) the social responsibility; and (5) the business achievement. Additionally, for the corporate identity assessment, this study considers the following six factors: (1) Agreeableness (Goodness), (2)Capability (Ability), (3)Enterprise (Rise), (4)Chic (Class), (5) Ruthlessness (Authority), and (6)Informality. Based on these categories and factors, this study develops a technique quantifying the corporate reputation value by selecting 'word items' for the reputation search, and after conducting a frequency analysis in a survey. Also, to verify the result, this study exemplifies the reputation of three SI companies in Korea which could be utilized by using the commercialized reputation service. This study firstly attempts the corporate reputation measurement by classifying the identity and the awareness (corporate image and communication) upon a company in detail and enables its real applicabilities by proposing a formula to measure the reputation scores which can be utilized by verified word items from a frequency analysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Larry Weber, "How Digital Business Reputations Are Created Over Time and Lost in a Click," Park, Sun-Ryung 'Corporate reputation, social networks depends on', Mentor, pp30-31, 2011.12
  2. Rosa Chun, "Make reputation management," Yeun, Jun-hyeok,Wisdom House, 2011.10
  3. Business Week, 2007.7.9
  4. Lee, Ho-young, Kim, Sa-Hyuck, "Social Impact of Online Reputation Systems," KISDI, 2010.2.8
  5. Wikipedia
  6. Fombrun, C.J., "Reputation : Realizing value from the corporate image," Boston : Harvard School Press,1996
  7. Balmet, J, M.T., Corporate identity:Past, present and Future university of sthrathclyde, 1997
  8. Bromely, D.B., "Reputation, Image and Impression Management," Wiley & Son, New York, 1993
  9. Dowling, G., "Creating Corporate reputation : Identity, image and performance," NY:Oxford University Press, 2001
  10. Gosti., M. &Wilson, A.M., Corporate reputation : Seeking a definition. Corporate Communications : An International Journal, 6(1), 24-30
  11. Lee, Min-hee, "A study on corporate reputation factors : Based on symbolic relationship and behavior relationship," Graduate School of Sookmyung Women's University, 2007.12
  12. Park, Sin-young , "A Study Upon Effects of Firm Reputations and Network Types on Firm Performances," Yeungnam University, 2012
  13. Lewis. S. "Reputation and corporate Responsibility," Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), pp 356-366, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540310807494
  14. Brown. B & Perry. S "Removing the Financial Performance Halo from Fortune's Most Admired Companies," Academy of Management Journal. 37(5), pp. 1347-1359, 1994 https://doi.org/10.2307/256676
  15. Rosa Chun, Corporate Reputation: Meaning and Measurement, International Journal of Management Reviews Volume 7, Issue 2 pp. 91-109, (C) Blackwell Publishing Ltd., June 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00109.x
  16. Davies, G., Chun, R., daSilva, R. and Roper, S., Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness. London : Routledge. 2003
  17. Cha, Hee-won, "A Study on the Development of Korean Corporate Reputation Index," KOBACO, Vol 64, pp 259-289,2004
  18. Kao, A, and S. R. Pottet. 2007 "Overview" In A. Kao and S.R. Poteet. eds., "Natural Language Processing and Text Mining" London: Springer-Verlag. pp.1-7, 2007
  19. Redmond-Meal. A., and M. M. Hlava. eds. 2005. ASIS&T Thesaurus of Information Science, Technology, and Librarianship. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. Its implications for Furture Research, Journal of Marketing Vol. 49, Fall 1985
  20. Cho, Sung-woo, Big Data era technology, KT Institute of Technology, p. 5
  21. Albert Caruana. Corporate reputation : Concept and measurement, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT & BRAND MANAGEMENT, VOL. 6 NO. 2 pp. 109-118, (C) MCB UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1061-0421, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429710175646
  22. Albert, S. & Whetten, D. A., Organization Identity. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol 7, pp 263-295, 1985
  23. Yoon, Mi-Hee, "Case study of organizational identity construction and collective learning process in social enterprise : focusing on online shoppingmall in 'beautiful store," Graduate School of Seoul University, 2010
  24. Han, Hye-jung, "Organization Identity Components and Relationship with Organizational Identification," Graduate School of Seoul University, 2003.
  25. Kim, Dong-tae, "Study of the effect on the company of older affinity : focused on the corporate response path and the brand response path," Graduate School of Seoul University, 1967, 2007 Published
  26. 5 kinds of working conditions of work you want, http://photouni.tistory.com/270 (Downloaded 2013.6.7)
  27. Fun corporate culture, good company good company welfare, http://www.etoday.co.kr/news/section/newsview.php?idxno=743174,e-today, 2013-06-05 08:48 article (Downloaded 2013.6.7)
  28. Terms of good corporate employees to work or a way forward, http://wafflemaker.tistory.com/528(Downloaded 2013.6.7)
  29. The working conditions of workers want a good company, http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=livart_haum&logNo=10145984960&redirect=Dlog&widgetTypeCall=true (Downloaded 2013.6.7)
  30. Conditions of good work, http://blog.daum.net/kws0123/1178561(Downloaded 2013.6.7)

피인용 문헌

  1. 온라인 뉴스를 이용한 기업평판 구성요인 탐색 및 지수 개발 연구 : 감성분석과 AHP적용 vol.19, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9716/kits.2020.19.6.145