The Development and Validation of the Korean Strength Scale

한국인 강점 척도의 개발 및 타당화

  • Received : 2013.03.18
  • Accepted : 2013.04.16
  • Published : 2013.04.30

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean Strength Scale and to examine its validity and reliability. Methods : The Korean Strength Scale is a self-report questionnaire that measures 25 valued strengths and is comprised of 124 items ; each item had a 0-5 rating on a 6-point scale. In order to test validity and reliability, data were collected from 355 adults. The measures included the Korean Strength Scale, HEXACO Personality Inventory (HEXACO-PI), Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS), Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and Orientations to Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ). Results : The resulting exploratory factor analysis of the Korean Strength Scale suggested 4 factor structures. The Korean Strength Scale was shown to have acceptable psychometric properties, including acceptable internal-consistency reliabilities, factorial validity, and high convergent correlations. Conclusion : Although there is room on improvement for some facet scales, the Korean Strength Scale appears to be a useful tool for assessing an individual's signature strengths.

본 연구는 한국인에게 맞는 강점 척도의 개발과 타당화를 목적으로 한다. 연구 참여자는 남녀 성인 355명이었으며, 측정도구는 HEXACO 성격 검사, 삶의 만족도 척도, 긍정적 부정적 정서 척도, 행복추구경향 척도를 사용하였다. 탐색적 요인 분석 결과, 25개의 하위 영역은 4개의 상위 요인 구조를 보였다. 한국인 강점 척도는 높은 내적일치 신뢰도를 보였고, 각각의 하위영역와 개념적으로 유사하기 때문에 높은 상관을 나타내리라고 기대하였던 관련 측정치들과 예상대로 높은 상관을 보였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 한국인 강점 척도는 신뢰롭고 타당한 측정 도구로 평가되었으며, 개인의 대표강점의 발견과 활용에 관한 임상적 실제, 연구 및 교육에 효과적으로 이용 가능할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Keyes CLM, Lopez SJ. Toward a science of mental health: positive directions in diagnosis and interventions. In Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. London: Oxford University Press;2002. p.45-59.
  2. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association;2004.
  3. Peterson C. A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press;2006.
  4. Seligman MEP. Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press;2002.
  5. Rashid T, Anjum A. Positive psychotherapy for young adults and children. In John, RZ, Benjamin LH, editors. Handbook of depression in children and adolescents. Guilford Press;2008. p.250-287.
  6. Seligman ME, Steen TA, Park N, Peterson C. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol 2005; 60:410-421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
  7. Seligman ME, Rashid T, Parks AC. Positive psychotherapy. Am Psychol 2006;61:774-788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774
  8. Dahlsgaard K, Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Shared virtue: the convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Rev Gen Psychol 2005;9:203-213. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.203
  9. Park N, Peterson C. Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: the development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. J Adolesc 2006;29:891-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011
  10. Kim KU, Yoon YK, Kwon SM, Ha SS. Character strengths and their relationship with perceived happiness and life adjustment of cadets under the perspective of positive psychology. Korean J Couns Psychother 2010;22:233-248.
  11. Ha SS, Kwon SM. Influence of temperament and perceived parenting styles on character strengths: focusing on the mediating effect of perceived parenting styles. Korean J Clin Psychol 2011;30:263-284. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2011.30.1.014
  12. Lim YJ. Character strengths and mental well-being. Korean J Clin Psychol 2012;3:713-730.
  13. Yoon SM, Shin HC. Character strengths: their relationships with happiness among middle-aged women at korean metropolitan area. Korean J Couns Psychother 2012;24:27-49.
  14. 권석만, 유성진, 임영진, 김지영. 성격강점검사 전문가 지침서. 서울: 학지사 심리검사 연구소;2010.
  15. Compton, WC, Smith ML, Cornish, KA, Qualls DL. Factor structure of mental health measures. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;71:406-413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.406
  16. Lopez SJ, Snyder CR. The Oxford handbook of positive psychology. London: Oxford University Press;2011.
  17. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larson RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 1985;49:71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  18. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
  19. Peterson C, Park N, Seligman MEP. Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life. J Happiness Stud 2005;6:25-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z
  20. Lee K, Ashton MC. Psychometirc properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behav Res 2004:39;329-358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
  21. Yoo TY, Lee K, Ashton MC. Psychometric properties of the korean version of the HEXACO personality inventory. Korean J Soc Pers Psychol 2004;18:61-75.
  22. Cawley MJ, Martin JE, Johnson JA. A virtues approach to personality. Pers Individ Dif 2000;28:997-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00207-X
  23. Goldberg LR. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol 1993;48:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
  24. Goldberg LR. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde I, Deary I, Fruyt FD, Ostendorf F, editors. Personality psychology in Europe. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press;1999. p.7-28.
  25. Peterson C, Ruch W, Beerman U, Park N, Seligman MEP. Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. J Posit Psychol 2007;2:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760601076650
  26. Chan DW. The hierarchy of strengths: their relationships with subjective well-being among chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Teach Educ 2009;25:867-878.