References
- 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-3 61호 [별책 8]. 서울: 교육과학기술부.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). Mathematics curriculum. MEST announcement 2011-361 [Separate version 8]. Seoul: MEST.)
- 교육과학기술부 (2012). 수학교육선진화방안. 교육과학기술부 보도자료.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2012). Advancement strategies of mathematics education. MEST report.)
- 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 1-2 학년군 1. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 1-2 (1). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
- 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 1-2 학년군 3. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 1-2 (3). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
- 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 3-4 학년군 1. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 3-4 (1). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
- 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 3-4 학년군 3. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 3-4 (3). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
- 김태열 (2009). 산업계 '통섭' 깜짝 제품을 낳다. 서울: 위클리 경향.(Kim, T. Y. (2009). 'Consilience' in industry produced surprising products. Seoul: Weekly Kyunghyang.)
- 노상우, 안동순 (2012). 초등학교 융합인재교육(STEAM) 의 발전 방향. 교육종합연구, 10(3) 75-96.(Kho, S. W. & Ahn, D. S. (2012). The direction of STEAM in elementary school. Education Integration Research, 10(3) 75-96.)
- 박만구 (2007). 참여수학을 통한 수학교육 활성화를 위한 모델 개발. 한국학교수학회논문집, 10(4), 425-457.(Park, M. (2007). The development of model for enhancement of mathematics education through participatory mathematics. Journal of Korean School Mathematics, 10(4), 425-457.)
- 박만구 (2011). 창의성 신장을 위한 초등수학 과제의 유형. 초등수학교육, 14 (2), 117-134.(Park, M. G. (2007). The types of elementary mathematical tasks for enhancement of mathematical creativity. Elementary Mathematics Education, 14(2), 117-134.)
- 박형주 (2012). 통합 교육에 근거한 중학교 수학 교과서 분석-STEAM교육을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 석사 학위 논문.(Park, H. J. (2012). An analysis on the middle school mathematics textbooks based on integration education-Focused on STREAM education. Master thesis at Ewha Woman's University.)
- 송신철, 홍보라, 김남희, 한화정, 심규철 (2012). 고등학교 융합형 '과학'과목 운영에 대한 고등학생과 과학교사의 인식 조사 연구. 과학교육연구지, 36(1), 130-138.(Song, S. C., Hong, B. R., Kim, N. H., Han, W. J., & Shim, K. C. (2012). The perceptions of high school students and science teachers toward the practice of high school convergent type 'science' subject. Journal of Science Education Research, 36(1) 130-138.)
- 오명석 (2012). 지식의 통섭(通涉)과 인류학. 비교문화연구, 18(2), 175-222.(Oh, M. S. (2012). Consilience of knowledge and anthropology. Comparative Literature Research, 18(2) 175-222.)
- 윤회정, 윤원정, 우애자 (2011). 2009 개정 교육과정과 융 합형 과학 교과서에 대한 고등학교 과학교사들의 인 식. 교과교육학연구, 15(3), 757-776.(Yun, H. J., Yun, W. J., & Woo A. J. (2011). 2009 revised curriculum and the perceptions of high school science teachers toward convergent science textbooks. Subject Pedagogical Research, 15(3), 757-776.)
- 위수정 (2010). 미국 유아교육에서 드라마와 수학의 통합 교육과정에 관한 질적사례연구. 한국실천유아교육학회, 15 , 37-59.(Wie, S. J. (2010). A qualitative case study on American drama in early childhood education and mathematics integrative education curriculum. Korean Early Childhood Education of Practice, 15, 37-59.)
- 이경진, 김경자 (2012). 통합교육과정 접근으로서의 "융합인재교육(STEAM)"의 의미와 실천 가능성 탐색. 한국초등교육학회, 25(3), 55-81.(Lee, K. J. & Kim, K. J. (2012). The meaning of exploratory possibility of practice of STEAM as integrative education curriculum. The Society of Korean Elementary Education, 25(3) 55-81.)
- 이인식 (2008). 지식의 대융합. 서울: 고즈원.(Lee, I. S. (2008). The mega convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Kozwon.)
- 이혜숙 , 임혜미, 문종은 (2010). 수학과학통합교육의 설계 및 실행에 대한 연구. 수학교육, 49(2), 175-198.(Lee, H. S., Lim, H. M., & Moon, J. E. (2010). A study on the design and practice of integrative education of mathematics and science. Mathematics Education, 49(2) 175-198.)
- 임유나 (2012). 통합 교육과정에 근거한 융합인재교육 (STEAM)의 문제점과 개선 방향. 한국초등교육학회, 25(4), 53-80.(Lim, Y. N. (2012). The problems and improvement of STEAM education based on the integrative education curriculum. The Society of Korean Elementary Education, 25(4) 53-80.)
- 정정희, 김신아, 배재정 (2007). 사회수학 통합활동이유 아의 사회적 기술과 수학적 문제해결력에 미치는 영 향. 유아수학, 16(4), 247-259.(Chung, J. H., Kim, S. H., & Bae, J. J. (2007). The influence on the toddler's social skills and mathematical problem solving ability of socal science and mathematics integration. Early Childhood Mathematics, 16(4) 247-259.)
- 정진수, 김동원, 임재근, 이윤정, 김은애, 임성만 (2012). 고교 융합형 '과학' 교과서에 대한 학생들의 의견. 대한지구과학학회지, 5(2), 189-196.(Jung, J. S., Kim, D. W., Lim, J, K., Lee, Y. J., Kim, E. A., & Lim, S. M. (2012). The students' opinions on the convergence 'science' textbooks. Journal of Korean Earth Science Education, 5(2) 189-196.)
- 조향숙, 김훈, 허준영 (2012). 현장 적용 사례를 통한융 합인재교육(STEAM)의 이해. 한국과학창의재단 현안 보고 CR 2012-02-02.(Cho, H. S., Kim, H., &Hur, J. Y. (2012). The understanding of STEAM education through field application cases. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity report. CR 2012-02-02.)
- 최민자 (2010). 통섭의 기술: 지식시대에서 지성시대로. 서울: 도서출판 모시는 사람들.(Cha, M. J.. (2010). The skill of convergence: From knowledge era to intelligence era. Seoul: Publisher Moshien SaramDeul.)
- 최재천 (2006). 생명의본질과 지식의 통섭(統攝 ): The Nature of Life and Consilience of Knowledge. 서울 대학교 천문학과 콜로퀴움 자료.(Cha, J. J.. (2006). The nature of life and consilience knowledge. Seoul: unpublished paper at a colloquium at the department of astronomy at Seoul National University.)
- 최재천, 장재익 (2005). 통섭: 지식의 대통합. 서울: 사이 언스북스.(Cha, J. J. & Jang, J. I. (2005). Consilience: The mega convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Sciencebooks)
- 최정훈 (2011). 융합을 기반으로 하는 STEAM 교육이란? 월간 과학창의 2월호 . 4-7.(Cha, J. H. (2011). What is STEAM education based on convergence? Monthly Science Creativity, February, 4-7.)
- 하혜정, 박현주, 김종학, 손정우, 김용진 (2012). 고등학교 융합형 '과학'의 교수 활동에 대한 생물 교사들의 어려움. 생물교육, 40(2), 267-277.(Ha, H. J., Park, H. J., Kim, J. H., Son, J. W., & Kim, Y. K. (2012). The difficulties of biology teachers on the convergence high school 'science' teaching and learning activities. Biology Education, 40(2) 267-277.)
- 황농문 (2008). 인생을 바꾸는 몰입. 서울: 랜덤하우스.(Whang, N. M. (2008). Life changing flow. Seoul: Randomhouse.)
- 황혜정 외 (2010). 창의 중심의 수학 수업 내실화 및 평가방안 연구. 한국과학창의재단 보고서 2010-2.(Whang, H. J. et al. (2010). A study on the effective mathematics lessons based on creativity. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity report. CR 2010-02.)
- 홍영기 (2008). 수학.과학 교과의 주제중심 통합프로그램의 효과. 통합교육과정연구, 3(2), 42-68.(Hong, Y. K. (2008). The effects of thematic integration program on mathematics and science subjects. Integration Education Curriculum Research, 3(2) 42-68.)
- Berlin, D. F. & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00111.x
- Hudson, L. (1967). Contrary imaginations: A psychological study of the English schoolboy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Jones, I., Lake, V, E., & Dagli, U. (2005). Integration of science and mathematics methods and preservice teachers' understanding of constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25, 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1090102050250209
- Mullis. I. V. S., Martin, M. O., &Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Retrieved on April 2, 2013 at http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/TIMSS2 007_ InternationalMathematicsReport.pdf.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Sheffield, L. J. (2006). Developing mathematical promise and creativity. Proceedings of the 11th International Seminar on Education of Gifted Students in Mathematics, 1-7.
- Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19-34.
- Stinson, D., & Wager, A. (2012). Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- TERC (2008). Investigations: in numbers, data, and space. Glenview, IIL: Pearson.
- Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J, S, Purcell, J, Leppien, J, & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Cited by
- A co-authorship network analysis on mathematics education scholars vol.52, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.4.483
- A Study on Convergence Curriculum Development for Idea Creation vol.12, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.571