Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Metacognition to the Information-Seeking Behavior of Undergraduate Students

메타인지가 대학생의 정보탐색행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • 최문정 (가천대학교 중앙도서관) ;
  • 정동열 (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학전공)
  • Received : 2013.04.17
  • Accepted : 2013.05.07
  • Published : 2013.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the effect of metacognition to the information-seeking behaviors of 250 undergraduate students. For this, metacognition was examined by the inspection form that the Educational Psychology Programs of the Department of Education, at Seoul National University, developed in 2005. The information-seeking behaviors were examined by the observance of the established information-seeking performances and through a survey. As a result of the analysis, metacognition affected the items of the survey for the information-seeking behaviors, excluding one item. As metacognition is the cognitive characteristics acting after the cognitive process, it affected thinking activities that were conducted by the brain. In addition, metacognition affected the seeking process, the results of seeking, and the general information-seeking behaviors. Therefore, the study of metacognition is effective in the overall aspects of information-seeking behaviors including the seeking process, the results of seeking, and the general information-seeking behaviors.

본 연구는 대학생 250명을 대상으로 메타인지가 정보탐색행위에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 메타인지는 서울대학교 인지학습연구회에서 2005년에 개발한 검사 양식지를 사용하여 검사하였으며, 정보탐색행위는 정보탐색 수행평가와 설문조사의 방법으로 조사하였다. 분석 결과, 메타인지는 한 항목을 제외하고는 전부 정보탐색행위 설문조사의 항목에 유의했다. 이로써 메타인지는 인지 과정 이후에 작용하는 인지적 특성이므로 자신의 정보탐색행위를 두뇌로 생각하면서 결론을 내리는 사고적인 행위에 영향을 미쳤다고 할 수 있다. 그리고 메타인지는 탐색과정, 탐색결과와 일반적인 정보탐색행위에 영향을 미쳤다. 따라서 탐색과정, 탐색결과, 일반적인 정보탐색행위를 포함한 정보탐색행위 전반적 측면에서는 메타인지 연구가 효율적이라고 할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수미. 1996. 메타인지 개념의 수학교육적 고찰. 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원, 수학교육과. (Kim, Soo-Mi. 1996. A study on the concept of metacognition in mathematics education. Ph.D. diss., Seoul National University.)
  2. 김현진. 2007. 인지와 메타인지전략교수가 경도장애학생의 수학 문장제 문제해결 수행능력.태도.귀인에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 특수교육학과. (Kim, Hyun-Jin. 2007. Effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical word problem solving․attitudes․attribution of students with mild disabilities. Ph.D. diss., EWHA Womans University.)
  3. 신종호, 최효식. 2007. 메타인지의 영역 일반성과 영역 특수성 비교. 교육심리연구, 21(1): 89-104. (Shin, Jong-Ho, & Choi, Hyo-Sik. 2007. "Comparative study on domain generality and specificity of metacognition." Journal of the Korean Educational Psychology Association, 21(1): 89-104.)
  4. 신혜은, 최경숙. 2002. 아동의 메타인지 조절의 미시 발생적 변화. 한국심리학회, 15(2): 33-53. (Shin, Hye-Eun, & Choi, Kyoung-Sook. 2002. "Microgenetic changes in children's metacognitive regulation." The Korean Journal of Development Psychology, 15(2): 33-53.)
  5. 이은주. 2010. 메타인지를 활용한 직접적 탐구기능 수업전략에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 과학교육학과. (Lee, Eun-Ju. 2010. A study of direct teaching strategy of inquiry skills applying meta-cognition. Ph.D. diss., EWHA Womans University.)
  6. 이지혜. 2009. 자기결정성 학습동기, 메타인지, 자기주도적 학습능력 및 학습몰입과 학업 성취 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 박사학위논문, 충북대학교 대학원, 교육학과. (Lee, Ji-Hye. 2009. Analysis of the structural relationships among self-determination motivation to learn, metacognition, self-directed learning ability, learning flow, and school achievement. Ph.D. diss., Chungbuk National University.)
  7. 장인남. 2006. 고등학생의 학교도서관 이용행태와 메타인지와의 상관관계에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 성균관대학교 대학원, 사서교육계열. (Chang, In-Nam. 2006. Study on correlation between using habits of school library and metacognition of high school students. master's thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.)
  8. 조연. 2010. 문제중심학습에서 학습자의 인지양식과 메타인지가 문제해결에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문, 전북대학교 대학원, 교육학과. (Juan, Zhao. 2010. The effects of cognitive style and metacognition on problem solving in problem-based learning. Ph.D. diss., Chonbuk National University)
  9. 황희숙. 1994. 초인지적 학습전략 훈련이 학습전략 사용 및 독해과제 수행에 미치는 효과. 박사학위논문, 부산대학교 대학원, 교육학과. (Hwang, Hee-Sook. 1994. The effects of metacognitive strategies training on the use of strategies and reading comprehension. Ph.D. diss., Pusan National University.)
  10. Bayat, S., & Tarmizi, R. A. 2010. "Accessing cognitive and metacognitive strategies during algebra problem solving among university students." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8: 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.056
  11. Bowler, L. 2010a. "A taxonomy of adolescent metacognition knowledge during the information search process." Library & Information Science Research, 32(1): 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.09.005
  12. Bowler, L. 2010b. "The self-regulation of curiosity and interest during the information search process of adolescent students." JASIST, 61(7): 1332-1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21334
  13. Braten, I., Stromso, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. 2005. "The relationship between internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within internet technologies." Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2): 141-171. https://doi.org/10.2190/E763-X0LN-6NMF-CB86
  14. Brown, A. L. 1980. "Metacognitive development and reading." In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer(eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  15. Brown, A. L. 1987. "Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms." In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe(eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  16. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. 1983. "Learning, remembering, and understanding." In P. H. Mussen(ed.), Handbook of child psychology. v.3. NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  17. Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. 1988. "Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension." Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2): 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.131
  18. Flavell, J. H. 1976. "Meta-cognitive aspects of problem solving." In L. Resnick(ed.), The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  19. Gagniere, L., Betrancourt, M., & Detienne, F. 2012. "When metacognitive prompts help information search in collaborative setting." Revue europeenne de psychologie appliquee, 62(2): 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2011.12.005
  20. Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. 1985. "Metacognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance." Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3): 163-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391
  21. Ghiasvand, M. Y. 2010. "Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement: Based on information processing approach." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5: 1033-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.231
  22. Gorrell, G., Eaglestone, B., Ford, N., Holdridge, P., & Madden, A. 2009. "Towards 'metacognitively aware' IR systems: An initial user study." Journal of Documentation, 65(3): 446-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910952429
  23. Hjorland, B. 2002. "Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science." JASIST, 53(4): 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042
  24. Hofer, B. K. 2004. "Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching." Educational Psychologist, 39(1): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
  25. Julien, H., & Duggan, L. J. 2000. "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Information Needs and Uses Literature." Library & Information Science Research, 22(3): 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00057-2
  26. Killpatrick, J. 1985. "Reflection and recursion." Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(1): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354880
  27. Kroll, D. L. 1988. Cooperative mathematical problem solving and metacognition: A case study of three pairs of women. Ph.D. diss., Indiana University.
  28. Kuhn, D. 2000. "Metacognitive development." Current directions in psychological science, 9(5): 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088
  29. Liu, G. Z., & Chong, S. S. 2011. "Metacognition & conceptual drifting in interactive information retrieval: An exploratory field study." ASIST, October: 9-13.
  30. Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. 2011. "Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning." Learning and Instruction, 21(1): 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.001
  31. Moore, P. A. 1995. "Information problem solving: A wider view of library skills." Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(1): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1001
  32. Musholt, K. 2012. "Concepts of metacognition - What is the issue? Commentary on Stephane Savanah's the concept possession hypothesis of self-consciousness." Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2): 721-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.05.002
  33. Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. 1992. "Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design." Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2): 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297053
  34. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. 1990. "How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction." In B. A. Jones, & L. Idol(eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  35. Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. 2008. "Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext." Metacognition Learning, 3(1): 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9008-7
  36. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. 2005. "A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding." Educational Psychologist, 40(4): 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
  37. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1987. "What's all the fuss about metacognition?" In A. H. Schoenfeld(ed.), Cognitive science of mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  38. Schommer, M. 1990. "Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension." Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3): 498-504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
  39. Song, C., Kanai, R., Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. 2011. "Relating inter-individual differences in metacognitive performance on different perceptual tasks." Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4): 1787-1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.011
  40. Spada, M. M., Langston, B., Nikcevic, A. V., & Moneta, G. B. 2008. "The role of metacognitions in problematic internet use." Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5): 2325-2335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.12.002
  41. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. 2007. "Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models." International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3): 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3
  42. Temur, T., Kargin, T., Bayar, S. A., & Bayar, V. 2010. "Metacognitive awareness of grades 6, 7 and 9 students in reading process." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2): 4193-4199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.663
  43. Wellman, H. M. 1985. "The origins of metacognition." In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. Mackinnon, & T. G. Waller(eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance. Orlando: Academic Press.
  44. Whitmire, E. 2003. "Epistemological beliefs and the information-seeking behavior of undergraduates." Library & Information Science Research, 25(2): 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00003-3

Cited by

  1. The Metacognition, Self-efficacy and Self-leadership among Nursing Students vol.17, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.9.619