DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis Study on Distance Contrast Sensitivities According to Progressive Lens Design

누진렌즈 디자인에 따른 원거리 대비감도 비교분석 연구

  • 신동민 (건양대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김수현 (건양대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 정주현 (건양대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.26
  • Accepted : 2013.09.14
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was a comparative analysis of the effect of distance contrast sensitivity when wearing free-form progressive lens and conventional progressive lens. Methods: The 20 subjects who do not have any ocular diseases were participated in this study. Contrast sensitivities at 5 different levels of spatial frequency were conducted by using FACT (Stereo Optical, USA). Results: Contrast sensitivity was measured for free-form progressive lens and conventional progressive lens in the order of right eye, left eye and binocular. Right/left/binocular contrast sensitivity values of the free-form progressive lenses compared to the conventional progressive lenses were higher 16%/17%/11% at A(1.5 cpd) of spatial frequency, 11%/5%/5% at B(3 cpd) of spatial frequency, 6%/6%/9% at C(6 cpd) of spatial frequency, 19%/16%/13% at D(12 cpd) of spatial frequency, 4%/3%/18% at E(18 cpd) of spatial frequency. Conclusions: In all the area of spatial frequency, distance contrast sensitivity values were measured highly on free-form progressive lens than on conventional progressive lens.

목적: 본 연구에서는 프리폼 누진렌즈와 일반 누진렌즈를 착용 하였을 때 원거리 대비감도에 미치는 영향을 비교 분석 하였다. 방법: 안질환이 없는 성인 20명을 대상으로 원거리 대비감도 검사를 실시하였고 5단계의 공간 주파수를 갖는 F.A.C.T.(Stereo Optical, USA)를 이용하였다. 우안, 좌안, 양안 순서로 프리폼 누진렌즈와 일반누진렌즈 대비감도를 측정하였다. 결과: 우안/좌안/양안 대비감도 검사 값이 A(1.5 cpd) 공간주파수에서는 일반 누진렌즈에 비교하여 프리폼 누진렌즈가 16%/17%/11%, B(3 cpd) 공간주파수에서는 11%/5%/5%, C(6 cpd) 공간주파수에서는 6%/6%/9%, D(12 cpd) 공간주파수에서는 19%/16%/13%, E(18 cpd) 공간주파수에서는 4%/3%/18% 높았다. 결론: 원거리 대비감도의 모든 공간주파수 영역에서 프리폼 누진렌즈가 일반 누진렌즈보다 측정값이 높게 측정되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee KJ, Mah KC, Lee MH, Lee DH. Senior citizens vision care, 1st Ed. Seoul: Goryeo medicine, 2002;55-56.
  2. Pascal JI. Scope and significance of the accommodative unit. J Am Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1952;29(3): 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-195203000-00001
  3. Jin YG, Jang MH, Sim SH, Mah KC. Optical analysis of progressive addition lenses and classification for matching to visual needs of wearer. Korean J Vis Sci. 2008; 10(4):317-336.
  4. Hong JS, Mah KC, Kim HJ, Doo HY, Bae HJ. A Study on quality of life by age and occupation in progressive addition lens user. Korean J Vis Sci. 2007;9(1):65-77.
  5. Darryl J. Free-form surfacing technology makes possible new levels of optical sophistication for spectacles. Refractive Eye care for Ophthalmologist. 2005;9(6):1-4.
  6. Darryl J. The optics of free-form progressive lenses, 2008. http://www.opticampus.com/files/optics_of_freeform_ lenses.pdf(16 march 2011).
  7. Jeon IC, Kim HJ, Koh KH, Jang MH, Mah KC. Comparison analysis of clinical performance between back surface PAL's(Freeform) and front surface PAL's. Korean J Vis Sci. 2011;13(2):99-114.
  8. Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Jo SH, Jo BJ, Choi KY, Jung KH, et al. Comparison of contrast sensitivity with ACV (Visual Capacity Analyzer) in different types of posterior capsular opacification. Journal of the korean ophthalmological society. 2004;45(6):945-951.
  9. Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity and functional vision. International ophthalmology clinics. 2003;43(2):5-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-200343020-00004
  10. Ginsburg AP. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Opt Physiol Opt. 1984:61(6):403-407. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198406000-00011
  11. Carlson AS. Free-form technology: advantages and benefits, 2006. http://www.eyesite.co.za/magazine/spotlight4.asp? mainbutton=spotlight&navbutton=spotlight4(8 march 2012).
  12. Michael D. Presbyopic lenses: An evolution or a revolution. Review of optometry. 2008;145(12):36-37.
  13. Essilor. Contrast sensitivity benefits for wearers through Varilux Physio lenses. Institute for Vision Research. 2007:1-2.
  14. Villegas EA. Artal P. Impact of the aberrations of progressive power lenses on visual acuity. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:E4190.
  15. Heiting G. High-definition eyeglass lenses, 2012. http:// www.allaboutvision.com/lenses/wavefront-lenses.htm(17 september 2012).
  16. Yoho A. Free-form facts, 2010. http://www.eyecarebusiness. com/articleviewer.aspx?articleid=104669(14 October 2012).

Cited by

  1. Factors Influencing Subjective Satisfaction on Wearing Progressive Addition Lenses vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.4.377
  2. 액티브 시니어의 시각 피로도 연구 vol.18, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2018.18.08.018