DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Subjective Video Quality Comparison of 3D Display Monitors

3D 디스플레이 모니터의 주관적 화질 상관도 비교

  • Youn, Sungwook (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University) ;
  • Ok, Jiheon (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University) ;
  • Yim, Donghyun (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Taehwan (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Chulhee (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University)
  • 윤성욱 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 옥지헌 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 임동현 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 한태환 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 이철희 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과)
  • Received : 2013.04.08
  • Accepted : 2013.05.29
  • Published : 2013.05.30

Abstract

Recently, efforts have been made to develop international standards related to 3DTV quality assessment underway in International Telecommunication Union and Video Quality Experts Group. Unlike conventional 2D displays, there are several types of 3D display monitors: passive glasses, active glasses and auto-stereoscopic. In this paper, we performed subjective video quality tests using various 3D display monitors, in order to examine whether these display monitors can produce consistent perceptual video quality scores for processed video sequences. The experimental results show that the subjective scores of those 3D monitors are highly correlated and it appears that similar subjective scores will be obtained even when different types of 3D displays are used.

최근 3DTV의 화질 평가와 관련된 국제 표준이 국제전기통신연합과 VQEG 등을 중심으로 진행되고 있다. 기존의 2D 디스플레이와 달리 3D 디스플레이는 영상의 재생 방식과 전달 방법에 따라 편광안경, 셔터안경, 무안경 방식 등 여러 종류가 있으며, 다양한 기술들이 개발되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 여러 방식의 3D 디스플레이 기기를 사용하여 일관된 3D 화질 평가가 가능한지 조사하기 위하여, 상이한 디스플레이를 대상으로 주관적 화질 평가 실험을 수행하였다. 실험 결과 각 디스플레이에서 측정된 화질점수는 영상의 재생 방식이나 디스플레이의 크기에 관계없이 매우 높은 상관관계를 보였으며, 이는 다양한 디스플레이를 사용하여 열화신호의 체감 화질을 측정하는 경우 유사한 결과를 얻을 수 있음을 의미한다.

Keywords

References

  1. ITU-R, "Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems," Recommendation ITU-R BT.2021, 2012.
  2. ITU-T, "Subjective assessment methods for 3D Video Quality," ITU-T Draft New Recommendation P.3D-sam, 2012.
  3. ITU-T, "Assessment methods of visual fatigue and safety guideline for 3D video," ITU-T Draft New Recommendation J.3D-fatigue, 2012.
  4. ITU-T, "Display requirements for 3D video quality assessment," ITU-T Draft New Recommendation J.3D-disp-req, 2012.
  5. Video Quality Experts Group, "Test plan for evaluation of video quality models for us with stereoscopic three-dimensional television content," 2012.
  6. ITU-T, "Perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a reduced reference," ITU-T Recommendation J.249, 2010.
  7. ITU-R, "Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for broadcasting applications using low definition television in the presence of a full reference signal," ITU-R Recommendation BT.1866, 2010.
  8. ITU-R, "Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for broadcasting applications using low definition television in the presence of a reduced bandwidth reference," ITU-R Recommendation BT.1867, 2010.
  9. ITU-R, "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11, 2003.
  10. ITU-T, "Subective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," ITU-T Recommendation P.910rev, 2008.
  11. Jihwan Choe, Taeuk Jeong, Hyun Soo Choi, Eunjae Lee, Sang Wook Lee, and Chulhee Lee, "Comparison of subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," Journal of Broadcast Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 177-184, Mar 2007. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5909/JBE.2007.12.2.177