Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5909/JBE.2013.18.3.416

Subjective Video Quality Comparison of 3D Display Monitors  

Youn, Sungwook (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University)
Ok, Jiheon (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University)
Yim, Donghyun (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University)
Han, Taehwan (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University)
Lee, Chulhee (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Broadcast Engineering / v.18, no.3, 2013 , pp. 416-424 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, efforts have been made to develop international standards related to 3DTV quality assessment underway in International Telecommunication Union and Video Quality Experts Group. Unlike conventional 2D displays, there are several types of 3D display monitors: passive glasses, active glasses and auto-stereoscopic. In this paper, we performed subjective video quality tests using various 3D display monitors, in order to examine whether these display monitors can produce consistent perceptual video quality scores for processed video sequences. The experimental results show that the subjective scores of those 3D monitors are highly correlated and it appears that similar subjective scores will be obtained even when different types of 3D displays are used.
Keywords
3D displays; subjective quality assessment; video quality; passive glasses; active glasses;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 ITU-T, "Perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a reduced reference," ITU-T Recommendation J.249, 2010.
2 ITU-R, "Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for broadcasting applications using low definition television in the presence of a full reference signal," ITU-R Recommendation BT.1866, 2010.
3 ITU-R, "Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for broadcasting applications using low definition television in the presence of a reduced bandwidth reference," ITU-R Recommendation BT.1867, 2010.
4 ITU-R, "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11, 2003.
5 ITU-T, "Subective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," ITU-T Recommendation P.910rev, 2008.
6 Jihwan Choe, Taeuk Jeong, Hyun Soo Choi, Eunjae Lee, Sang Wook Lee, and Chulhee Lee, "Comparison of subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," Journal of Broadcast Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 177-184, Mar 2007. (In Korean)   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
7 ITU-R, "Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems," Recommendation ITU-R BT.2021, 2012.
8 ITU-T, "Subjective assessment methods for 3D Video Quality," ITU-T Draft New Recommendation P.3D-sam, 2012.
9 ITU-T, "Assessment methods of visual fatigue and safety guideline for 3D video," ITU-T Draft New Recommendation J.3D-fatigue, 2012.
10 ITU-T, "Display requirements for 3D video quality assessment," ITU-T Draft New Recommendation J.3D-disp-req, 2012.
11 Video Quality Experts Group, "Test plan for evaluation of video quality models for us with stereoscopic three-dimensional television content," 2012.