References
- 교육인적자원부 (2005). 초등학교 교사용 지도서 과학 5-1. 서울: 대한교과서주식회사.
- 곽영순 (2009). 교실 수업에서 초임 과학교사의 교과내용지식이 내용교수지식에 주는 영향에 대한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), 611-625.
- 김규환, 김중복 (2011). 빛의 직진 개념 지도를 위한 탐구 학습모듈의 개발 및 적용. 과학교육연구지, 35(2),173-192.
- 김규환 (2012). 초등 과학수업에서 주제에 따른 Peer Instruction의 효과. 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
- 김종원, 김규환, 이지원, 황명수, 김중복 (2012). 과학교사 연수에서의 동료 교수법의 효과 및 교사의 인식. 과학교육연구지, 36(1), 84-93
- 김중복, 김현아, 김수경 (2006). 과학교사를 위한 빛과파동. 서울: 홍릉과학출판사.
- 백성혜, 정연경(2009).' 빛과상'에대한초등교사들의 이해와 학습 내용에 대한 인식 변화에 대한 사례 연구.초등과학교육, 28(3), 245-262.
- 이건호 (1999). 빛에 대한 초등학교 교사들의 개념. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
- 이은희(2011).' Peer Instruction'을통한과학교사의자기 개념 변화. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
- 이재봉, 남경운, 손정우, 이성묵 (2004). 광선추적과스펙트럼에 대한 교사와 중학생의 개념 유형 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1189-1205.
- 이희진 (2011). Peer Instruction을 통한 초등학교 6학년 학생의 과학개념변화. 한국교원대학교 교육대학원석사학위 논문.
- 정재훈, 김영신 (2010). 과학 실험 연수에 대한 초등교사들의 기대와 실태 분석. 초등과학교육, 29(3), 316-325.
- 조희형, 고영자 (2008). 과학교사 교수내용지식(PCK)의 재구성과 적용 방법. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 618-632.
- Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
- Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
- Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students'preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301007
- Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. (pp. 417-451). NewYork: Routledge.
- Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2005). Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: Ablilty to solve novel problems. Advanced Physiology Education, 29, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00060.2004
- Crouch, C. H. (1998). Peer instruction: An interactive approach for large lecture lasses. Optics & Photonics News, 9(9), 37-41.
- Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
- Crouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on one, all at once. Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 1, 1-55.
- Ding, L., Reay, N. W., Lee, A., & Bao, L. (2009). Are we asking the right questions? Validating clicker question sequences by student interviews. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 643-650. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3116093
- Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. Physics Teacher, 40, 206-209. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1474140
- Feher, E., & Rice, K. (1988). Shadows and anti-images: Children's conceptions of light and vision. II. Science Education, 72(5), 637-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720509
- Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners'knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900290000
- Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
- Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800304
- Hecht, E. (2002). Optics, 4/E. New York: Wesley Longman.
- Lasry, N., Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2008). Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066-1069. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978182
- Lee, A., Ding, L., Reay, N. W., & Bao, L. (2011). Singleconcept clicker question sequences. The Physics Teacher, 49, 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3628273
- Limo、n, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
- Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2006). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74(2), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2162549
- Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A user's manual. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- McDermott, L. C. & Shaffer, P. S. (2002). Tutorial in introductory physics, 1/E. Prentice Hall.
- Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000122297
- Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Getzog. W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
- Rao, S. P. & Dicarlo, S. E. (2000). Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advanced Physiology Education, 24, 51-55.
- Rice, K., & Feher, E. (1987). Pinholes and images: children's conceptions of light and vision. I. Science Education, 71(4), 629-639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710413
- She, H. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: A study of air pressure and buoyancy . International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 981-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098895
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
- Turpen, C., & Finkeltein, N. (2009). Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors' implementation of peer instruction. Physical Review Special Topic Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020101-1-18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020101
- Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., &Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
- Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. North Carolina: Horizon Research.
- Wosilait, K., Heron, P. L., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (1998). Development and assessment of a researchbased tutorial on light and shadow. American Journal of Physics, 66(10), 906-913. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18988
Cited by
- 탐색기 과학영재를 위한 동료교수법 기반 교수·학습 프로그램 개발 및 적용 vol.23, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2013.23.2.237
- 높은 공간능력과 낮은 언어능력을 가진 초등 미성취 과학영재의 발견가능성 탐색 - 빛의 직진 개념을 중심으로 - vol.26, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2016.26.1.101