Korean Journal of Computational Design and Engineering (한국CDE학회논문집)

Society for Computational Design and Engineering (한국CDE학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design and Development of Scenario-Based Simulation System to Improve Shipbuilding Execution Scheduling Assessment -A Case Study on Panel Line-

시나리오 기반 조선 실행계획 평가 향상을 위한 시뮬레이션 시스템 개발 -패널라인 개발 사례를 중심으로-

  • Back, Myunggi (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Youngmin (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Inhyuck (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Kook (Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and IT Engineering of Kyungnam University) ;
  • Ryu, Cheolho (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha Technical College) ;
  • Shin, Jong Gye (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 백명기 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 김영민 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 황인혁 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 이광국 (경남대학교 조선해양IT공학과) ;
  • 류철호 (인하공업전문대학 조선해양과) ;
  • 신종계 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Received : 2012.09.27
  • Accepted : 2013.05.03
  • Published : 2013.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Today's ever-increasingly competitive shipbuilding market makes it essential for a shipbuilding company to have more efficient production processes and higher productivity as well as better design ability to obtain its competitiveness. A well-established production execution schedule plays an indispensable role to achieve this goal. Most shipbuilding companies carry out an evaluation on their mid-term plan once it is established. However, no evaluation activity exists for a production execution schedule, because practically all the companies depend on the field workers for the production execution scheduling. In this study, a prototype of a ship production execution schedule evaluation system is developed based on the component based design (CBD) methodology. This system enables one to make a production execution schedule that reflects up-to-date shipyard situation and to validate whether the schedule is feasible or not by running a production simulation according to the schedule. Users can also make use of the system as a decision supporting tool that compares several different execution schedules and evaluates which one is the best execution schedule.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y.I., Lee, C.H. and Park, C.S., 2009, Competitiveness of the Shipbuilding Industry Diagnosis of Korea, CEO Information, 690.
  2. Lee, J.M., Cho, S.W., Choi, Y.R. and Shin, J.G., 2006, A Development of Planning Evaluation Framework for Large Scale Shipyard, Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Fall, (http://www.kiie.org).
  3. Cho, K.K., Oh, S.C. and Yang, T.Y., 1985, Operations Scheduling for Multi-item, Small-sized Production, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 11(2), Dec., pp.57-73.
  4. Lee, S.W. and Kim, H.J., 1995, Erection Process Planning & Scheduling using Genetic Algorithm, Transactions of the Society of Naval Architecture of Korea, 32(1), pp.9-16.
  5. Koh, S.G., 1996, A Production Schedule with Genetic Algorithm in Block Assembly Shop, Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 13(1), pp.1-12.
  6. Yoon, D.Y. and Kim, K.C., 1993, Concept Establishment for Developing Process Planning/Scheduling Support System, Transactions of the Society of Naval Architecture of Korea, 30(4), pp.37-40.
  7. Kim, H.S., Lee, D.H., Bang, K.W., Cheon, H.K. and Kwak, I.S., 2010, Establishing Execution Schedule System in Shipbuilding Industry, Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Fall, (http://www.kiie.org).
  8. Panetto, H., Baina, S. and Morel, G., 2007. Mapping the IEC 62264 Models onto the Zachman Framework for Analysing Products Information Traceability: a Case Study, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(6), pp.679-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0040-x
  9. Koronios, A., Nastasie, D., Chanana, V. and and Haider, A., 2007. Integration Through Standards - An Overview of International Standards for Engineering Asset Management. 2nd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and the Fourth International Conference on Condition Monitoring, Harrogate, United KingDom, pp.11-14.
  10. Karnouskos, S., Baecker, O., De Souza, L.M.S. and Spiess, P., 2007. Integration of SOA-Ready Networked Embedded Devices in Enterprise Systems via a Cross-Layered Web Service Infrastructure, 12th IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Cagliari, Italy, pp.293-300.
  11. Kong, M.D., 2011. A Study on the Efficient MES Using Automation in Automotive Module Assembly Line, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 12(10), pp.4618-4625. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.10.4618
  12. Cheon, B.S., 2004, NET Enterprise System Object-Oriented CBD Development Methodology, Young-Jin.com, Seoul, Korea, ISBN:9788931428780.
  13. Woo, J.H., Lee, K.K., Jung, H.R., Kwon, Y.D. and Shin, J.G.., 2005, A Framework of Plant Simulation for a Construction of a Digital Shipyard, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 42(2), pp.165-174. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.2.165
  14. Lee, K., Shin, J.G. and Ryu, C., 2009, Development of Simulation Based Production Execution System in a Shipyard: A Case Study for a Panel Block Assembly Shop, Production Planning & Control, 20(8), pp.750-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280903164128