DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Equivalent frame model and shell element for modeling of in-plane behavior of Unreinforced Brick Masonry buildings

  • Received : 2012.09.08
  • Accepted : 2013.03.31
  • Published : 2013.04.25

Abstract

Although performance based assessment procedures are mainly developed for reinforced concrete and steel buildings, URM (Unreinforced Masonry) buildings occupy significant portion of buildings in earthquake prone areas of the world as well as in IRAN. Variability of material properties, non-engineered nature of the construction and difficulties in structural analysis of masonry walls make analysis of URM buildings challenging. Despite sophisticated finite element models satisfy the modeling requirements, extensive experimental data for definition of material behavior and high computational resources are needed. Recently, nonlinear equivalent frame models which are developed assigning lumped plastic hinges to isotropic and homogenous equivalent frame elements are used for nonlinear modeling of URM buildings. The equivalent frame models are not novel for the analysis of masonry structures, but the actual potentialities have not yet been completely studied, particularly for non-linear applications. In the present paper an effective tool for the non-linear static analysis of 2D masonry walls is presented. The work presented in this study is about performance assessment of unreinforced brick masonry buildings through nonlinear equivalent frame modeling technique. Reliability of the proposed models is tested with a reversed cyclic experiment conducted on a full scale, two-story URM building at the University of Pavia. The pushover curves were found to provide good agreement with the experimental backbone curves. Furthermore, the results of analysis show that EFM (Equivalent Frame Model) with Dolce RO (rigid offset zone) and shell element have good agreement with finite element software and experimental results.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrams, D.P. (1997), "Response of unreinforced masonry buildings", Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1(1), 257-273.
  2. Lourenco, P.J.B.B. (1996), "Computational strategies for Masonry structures", PhD Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Holland.
  3. Oliveira, D.V. de C. (2003), "Experimental and numerical analysis of blocky Masonry structures under cyclic loading", PhD Dissertation, University of Minho, Portugal.
  4. Elgawady, M.A., Lestuzzi, P. and Badoux, M. (2006), "Analytical model for in-plane shear behaviour of URM walls retrofitted with FRP", Composites Science and Technology, 66, 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.015
  5. Gilmore, A.T., Cuevas, O.Z. and Garcia, J.R. (2009), "Displacement-based seismic assessment of lowheight confined Masonry buildings", Earthquake Spectra, 25(2), 439-464. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3111149
  6. Kappos, A.J., Penelis, G.G. and Drakopoulos, C.G. (2002), "Evaluation of simplified models for lateral load analysis of unreinforced Masonry buildings", Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 890-897. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(890)
  7. Salonikios, T., Karakostas, C., Lekidis, V. and Anthoine, A. (2003), "Comparative inelastic pushover analysis of Masonry frames", Engineering Structures, 25, 1515-1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00118-4
  8. Pasticier, L., Amadio, C. and Fragiacomo, M. (2007), "Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a Masonry building by means of the SAP2000 V.10 Code," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 467-485.
  9. Belmouden, Y. and Lestuzzi, P. (2007), "An equivalent frame model for seismic analysis of Masonry and reinforced concrete buildings", Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 40-53.
  10. Roca, P., Molins, C. and Mari, A.R. (2005), "Strength capacity of Masonry wall structures by the equivalent frame method", Journal of Structural Engineering, 131, 1601-1610. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1601)
  11. Penelis, G.G. (2006), "An efficient approach for pushover analysis of URM structures", Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10(3), 359-379.
  12. Magenes, G. and Fontana, A.D. (1998), "Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of Masonry buildings", Proceeding of British Masonry Society, 8, 190-195.
  13. Dolce, M. (1989), "Models for in-plane loading of masonry walls", Corso sul consolidamento degli edifici in muratura in zona sismica, Ordine degli Ingegneri, Potenza. (in Italian)
  14. Steven, C.S., Matthew, A.H. and Sarah, L.O. (2004), "Tri-directional seismic analysis of an unreinforced Masonry building with flexible diaphragms", U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  15. CSI, SAP2000 V-14, Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures basic analysis reference manual, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California (USA).
  16. Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the seismic Rehabilitation of buildings Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, November.
  17. Magenes, G., Calvi, G.M. and Kingsley, G.R. (1995), "Seismic testing of a full-scale, two-story Masonry building: test procedure and measured experimental response", Experimental and Numerical Investigation on a Brick Masonry Building Prototype, Report 3.0, University of Pavia.

Cited by

  1. Micro modelling of masonry walls by plane bar elements for detecting elastic behavior vol.62, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.5.643
  2. Nonlinear analysis of contemporary and historic masonry vaulted elements externally strengthened by FRP vol.65, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.5.611
  3. In-plane response of masonry infilled RC framed structures: A probabilistic macromodeling approach vol.68, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.68.4.423