The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제5권1호
  • /
  • Pages.16-20
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retention of fiber posts to the optimally and over-prepared dowel spaces

  • 투고 : 2012.10.01
  • 심사 : 2013.01.17
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. To assess the retention of glass fiber post cemented with self-adhesive resin cement into optimum and over-prepared root canals following obturation in the presence of either eugenol (EB) or calcium hydroxide (CB)-based sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Roots of extracted premolars were endodontically-treated in 5 groups (n = 10). Roots of Group 1 (control) were left with no obturation and then optimally prepared to receive endodontic dowels. Other root canals were obturated with gutta-percha in the presence of either eugenol-based (Groups 2 and 4) or calcium hydroxide-based (Groups 3 and 5) sealer. Dowel spaces were prepared with optimal diameter in Groups 2 and 3, one size larger in Groups 4 and 5. Standardized fiber posts were luted to the prepared spaces using self-adhesive resin cement and its retention was then tested on an universal testing machine. Both one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD comparisons (${\alpha}$=0.05) were used to identify the significance of inter-group retention differences. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of both optimally and over-prepared dowel spaces was also considered to figure the nature of their interior out. RESULTS. The post retention was significantly higher to the non-obturated, optimally-prepared dowel spaces of Group 1 compared to the obturated, optimally-prepared ones of Groups 2 and 3. For each dowel space diameter, root canals obturated using CB of Groups 3 and 5 showed significantly higher dowel retention compared to those obturated using EB of Groups 2 and 4. Post retention to the over-prepared dowel spaces of Groups 4 and 5 was significantly higher than that recorded for the optimally-prepared ones of Groups 1-3. SEM images revealed traces of endodontic sealer and gutta-percha on the walls of the optimally-prepared dowel spaces. CONCLUSION. Despite the adverse effect of endodontic sealers on the retention of fiber posts, the over-preparation of dowel spaces helps to improve the retention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Erdemir A, Ari H, Güngüneş H, Belli S. Effect of medications for root canal treatment on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod 2004;30:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00013
  2. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:153-62.
  3. Ari H, Yaşar E, Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 2003;29:248-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200304000-00004
  4. Wachlarowicz AJ, Joyce AP, Roberts S, Pashley DH. Effect of endodontic irrigants on the shear bond strength of epiphany sealer to dentin. J Endod 2007;33:152-5.
  5. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90099-1
  6. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
  7. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
  8. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:39-44.
  9. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 1996: S50-6.
  10. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80002-X
  11. Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:227-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.025
  12. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004
  13. Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:967-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011
  14. Wang VJ, Chen YM, Yip KH, Smales RJ, Meng QF, Chen L. Effect of two fiber post types and two luting cement systems on regional post retention using the push-out test. Dent Mater 2008;24:372-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.012
  15. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mazzoni A, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Retentive strength and sealing ability of new self-adhesive resin cements in fiber post luting. Dent Mater 2011;27:e197-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.003
  16. Bateman GJ, Lloyd CH, Chadwick RG, Saunders WP. Retention of quartz-fibre endodontic posts with a self-adhesive dual cure resin cement. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:33-7.
  17. Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with a resin cement. Int Endod J 2002;35:372-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2001.00493.x
  18. Menezes MS, Queiroz EC, Campos RE, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of endodontic sealer cement on fibreglass post bond strength to root dentine. Int Endod J 2008;41: 476-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01378.x
  19. Demiryürek EO, Külünk S, Yüksel G, Saraç D, Bulucu B. Effects of three canal sealers on bond strength of a fiber post. J Endod 2010;36:497-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.014
  20. Burns DR, Moon PC, Webster NP, Burns DA. Effect of endodontic sealers on dowels luted with resin cement. J Prosthodont 2000;9:137-41. https://doi.org/10.1053/jopr.2000.19167
  21. Davis ST, O'Connell BC. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:468-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01649.x
  22. Boone KJ, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd. Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod 2001;27:768-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200112000-00014
  23. McMichen FR, Pearson G, Rahbaran S, Gulabivala K. A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers. Int Endod J 2003;36:629-35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00701.x
  24. Al-Omiri MK, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. Stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored with post-retained crowns: A finite element analysis study. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:289-300. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0168
  25. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005;31: 584-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000168891.23486.de
  26. Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel. J Prosthodont 2002;11:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2002.00019.x
  27. Alster D, Venhoven BA, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers. Biomaterials 1997;18:337-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00140-8
  28. D'Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D'Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:193-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9
  29. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Carlini-Júnior B, Ferraz CC. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. Int Endod J 2011;44:314-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01831.x
  30. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effects of C-factor and resin volume on the bonding to root canal with and without fibre post insertion. J Dent 2011;39:422-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.007

피인용 문헌

  1. Retention of Root Canal Posts: Effect of Cement Film Thickness, Luting Cement, and Post Pretreatment vol.40, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2341/14-159-l
  2. Influence of Relining Post on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements vol.16, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1722