Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.16

Retention of fiber posts to the optimally and over-prepared dowel spaces  

Othman, Hesham Ibrahim (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University)
Elshinawy, Mohamed Ibrahim (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University)
Abdelaziz, Khalid Mohamed (Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.1, 2013 , pp. 16-20 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To assess the retention of glass fiber post cemented with self-adhesive resin cement into optimum and over-prepared root canals following obturation in the presence of either eugenol (EB) or calcium hydroxide (CB)-based sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Roots of extracted premolars were endodontically-treated in 5 groups (n = 10). Roots of Group 1 (control) were left with no obturation and then optimally prepared to receive endodontic dowels. Other root canals were obturated with gutta-percha in the presence of either eugenol-based (Groups 2 and 4) or calcium hydroxide-based (Groups 3 and 5) sealer. Dowel spaces were prepared with optimal diameter in Groups 2 and 3, one size larger in Groups 4 and 5. Standardized fiber posts were luted to the prepared spaces using self-adhesive resin cement and its retention was then tested on an universal testing machine. Both one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD comparisons (${\alpha}$=0.05) were used to identify the significance of inter-group retention differences. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of both optimally and over-prepared dowel spaces was also considered to figure the nature of their interior out. RESULTS. The post retention was significantly higher to the non-obturated, optimally-prepared dowel spaces of Group 1 compared to the obturated, optimally-prepared ones of Groups 2 and 3. For each dowel space diameter, root canals obturated using CB of Groups 3 and 5 showed significantly higher dowel retention compared to those obturated using EB of Groups 2 and 4. Post retention to the over-prepared dowel spaces of Groups 4 and 5 was significantly higher than that recorded for the optimally-prepared ones of Groups 1-3. SEM images revealed traces of endodontic sealer and gutta-percha on the walls of the optimally-prepared dowel spaces. CONCLUSION. Despite the adverse effect of endodontic sealers on the retention of fiber posts, the over-preparation of dowel spaces helps to improve the retention.
Keywords
Dowel space; Fiber post; Endodontic sealer; Retention; Resin cement; Over-preparation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cantoro A, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mazzoni A, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Retentive strength and sealing ability of new self-adhesive resin cements in fiber post luting. Dent Mater 2011;27:e197-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bateman GJ, Lloyd CH, Chadwick RG, Saunders WP. Retention of quartz-fibre endodontic posts with a self-adhesive dual cure resin cement. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:33-7.
3 Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with a resin cement. Int Endod J 2002;35:372-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Menezes MS, Queiroz EC, Campos RE, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of endodontic sealer cement on fibreglass post bond strength to root dentine. Int Endod J 2008;41: 476-84.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Demiryürek EO, Külünk S, Yüksel G, Saraç D, Bulucu B. Effects of three canal sealers on bond strength of a fiber post. J Endod 2010;36:497-501.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Burns DR, Moon PC, Webster NP, Burns DA. Effect of endodontic sealers on dowels luted with resin cement. J Prosthodont 2000;9:137-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Davis ST, O'Connell BC. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:468-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Boone KJ, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd. Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod 2001;27:768-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 McMichen FR, Pearson G, Rahbaran S, Gulabivala K. A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers. Int Endod J 2003;36:629-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Al-Omiri MK, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. Stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored with post-retained crowns: A finite element analysis study. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:289-300.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005;31: 584-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel. J Prosthodont 2002;11:19-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Alster D, Venhoven BA, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers. Biomaterials 1997;18:337-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 D'Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D'Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:193-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Carlini-Júnior B, Ferraz CC. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. Int Endod J 2011;44:314-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effects of C-factor and resin volume on the bonding to root canal with and without fibre post insertion. J Dent 2011;39:422-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Wachlarowicz AJ, Joyce AP, Roberts S, Pashley DH. Effect of endodontic irrigants on the shear bond strength of epiphany sealer to dentin. J Endod 2007;33:152-5.
18 Erdemir A, Ari H, Güngüneş H, Belli S. Effect of medications for root canal treatment on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod 2004;30:113-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:153-62.
20 Ari H, Yaşar E, Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 2003;29:248-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
23 Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
24 Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:39-44.
25 Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 1996: S50-6.
26 Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:227-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Wang VJ, Chen YM, Yip KH, Smales RJ, Meng QF, Chen L. Effect of two fiber post types and two luting cement systems on regional post retention using the push-out test. Dent Mater 2008;24:372-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:967-77.   DOI   ScienceOn