DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maskless Screen Printing Process using Solder Bump Maker (SBM) for Low-cost, Fine-pitch Solder-on-Pad (SoP) Technology

  • Choi, Kwang-Seong (IT Materials and Components Laboratory Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Haksun (IT Materials and Components Laboratory Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Bae, Hyun-Cheol (IT Materials and Components Laboratory Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Eom, Yong-Sung (IT Materials and Components Laboratory Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute)
  • Received : 2013.09.13
  • Accepted : 2013.12.02
  • Published : 2013.12.30

Abstract

A novel bumping process using solder bump maker (SBM) is developed for fine-pitch flip chip bonding. It features maskless screen printing process. A selective solder bumping mechanism without the mask is based on the material design of SBM. Maskless screen printing process can implement easily a fine-pitch, low-cost, and lead-free solder-on-pad (SoP) technology. Its another advantage is ternary or quaternary lead-free SoP can be formed easily. The process includes two main steps: one is the thermally activated aggregation of solder powder on the metal pads on a substrate and the other is the reflow of the deposited powder on the pads. Only a small quantity of solder powder adjacent to the pads can join the first step, so a quite uniform SoP array on the substrate can be easily obtained regardless of the pad configurations. Through this process, an SoP array on an organic substrate with a pitch of 130 ${\mu}m$ is, successfully, formed.

Keywords

References

  1. S. C. Johnson, Semiconductor Int., (2009).
  2. R. Lathrop, Proc. Int. Wafer- (2008).
  3. K.-S. Choi et al., ETRI J. 21, 342 (2010).
  4. K.-S. Choi et al., ETRI J. 33, 637 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.11.0210.0298
  5. K -J. Sung et al., ETRI J. 34, 706 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.12.0112.0104
  6. Y.-S. Eom et al., Microelectron. Eng. 85, 327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2007.07.005
  7. Y.-S. Eom et al, ETRI J. 32, 414 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.10.0109.0400
  8. K.-S. Choi et al, ETRI J. 35, 340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.13.0212.0302
  9. M. Huang et al, IEEE Trans. Components and Packaging Tech. 31 767 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAPT.2008.2001194