Journal of Animal Environmental Science (한국축산시설환경학회지)

The Korean Society of Animal Environmental Science & Technology (한국축산환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of NaOH treatment-Citric acid neutralization of Korean Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on Physicochemical Compositions of Domestic Swine Excrement for the Connection to Thermophilic Aerobic Oxidation (TAO)

구제역 긴급행동지침(SOP)상의 화학처리방법으로 처리된 양돈분뇨의 고온호기산화공정 적용 연구

  • Received : 2013.10.24
  • Accepted : 2013.12.18
  • Published : 2013.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We planned to study how the chemical disposal designed by SOP can affect on physicochemical compositions of the livestock excrement. According to Livestock Manure Management Scheme, we experimented in two steps; the first step, NaOH treatment-Citric acid neutralization, and then the second procedure, Thermophilic Aerobic Oxidation (TAO) system. Physicochemical compositions of the 3-days-old samples after NaOH treatment were pH 10.31, EC 24.54 mS/cm, SCOD 3,022 mg/L, T-N 4,315 mg/L, $NH{_4}^+-N$ 1,960 mg/L, and not detected E. coli.. And those of one-day-old samples after citric acid neutralization were pH 7.36, EC 32.89 mS/cm, $SCOD_{Mn}$ 12,733 mg/L, T-N 4,787 mg/L, $NH{_4}^+-N$ 2,450 mg/L, and E. coli. not detected. In contrast, the physicochemical compositions of the treatment plots after the second treatment with TAO system (72hr) were pH 9.42 EC 24.21 mS/cm, $SCOD_{Mn}$ 3,660 mg/L, T-N 3,616 mg/L, $NH{_4}^+-N$ 1,190 mg/L, and no detection of E. coli.

Keywords

References

  1. AHPA, AWWA, WPCF., 1989. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition.
  2. Bachrach, H.L., Breese, S.S., Callis, J.J., Hess, W.R., Patty, R.E., 1957. Inactivation of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus by pH and Temperature Changes and by Formaldehyde. Exp Biol Med. 95(1), 147- 152. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-95-23148
  3. Chelme-Ayala, P., El-Din, M.G., Smith, R., Code, K.R., Leonard, J., 2011. Advanced treatment of liquid swine manure using physico-chemical treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 186(2-3), 1632-1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.047
  4. George T.D., 1960. Effects of Physical Environment on the Virus of Foot-And-Mouth Disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 83, 706-726.
  5. Girard, M., Nikiema, J., Brzezinski, R., Buelna, G., Heitz, M., 2009. A review of the environmental pollution originating from the piggery industry and of the available mitigation technologies: towards the simultaneous biofiltration of swine slurry and methane. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 36(22), 1946-1957. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-141
  6. Hong, S.M., Ha, D.H., 2012. Broadening Environmental Disaster and Securing Common Site : Focusing on the FMD Case in 2010-2011. Journal of Governance Studies. 7(1), 43-65.
  7. Hwang, E.J., 2008. Effect of Alkaline Pretreatment on Sludge Aerobic Digestion and Fertilizer Value. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. 30(1), 90-96.
  8. Kang, M.A., Kim, M.S., Choi, B.W., Sohn, H.Y., 2012. Organic Matter Analysis and Physicochemical Properties of Leachate from a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Landfill Site. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40(2), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1202.02008
  9. Kim, B.H., Choi, S.H., 2001. Epizootiological Properties of Foot-and-Mouth disease with Special Reference to Prevention and Control of the Outbreaks. Korean Society for Agricultural Medicine and Community Health. 26(1), 185-198.
  10. Kim, C.L., Kim, S.R., Kim, H.J., Jeon, S.J., Han, H., Kim, D.K, Lee, M.G., 2012. Physicochemical Changes of Swine Manure by the Treatment of Acid and Alkali for Inactivation of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Journal of livestock housing and environment. 18(3), 229-234.
  11. Kim, S.R., Yoon, S.H., Lee, J.H., Lee, M.G., 2009. Recycling Studies for Swine Manure Slurry Using Multi Process of Aerobic Digestion (MPAD). Journal of livestock housing and environment. 15(2), 155-160.
  12. McLaughlin, M.R., Brooks, J.P., Adeli, A., 2009. Characterization of selected nutrients and bacteria from anaerobic swine manure lagoons on sow, nursery, and finisher farms in the Mid-South USA. Journal of Environmental Quality. 38(6), 2422-2430. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0468
  13. Office International des Epizooties: OIE (www.oie.int).
  14. Sedlak. R.I., 1991. Phosphorus And Nitrogen Removal From Municipal Wastewater Principles And Practice. LEWIS PUBLISHERS2. 37-39.
  15. Vanotti, M.B., Millner, P.D., Hunt, P.G., Ellison, A.Q., 2005. Removal of pathogen and indicator microorganisms from liquid swine manure in multi-step biological and chemical treatment. Bioresource Technology. 96(2), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.010
  16. Zhu, J., 2000. A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 78, 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00116-4

Cited by

  1. Application of the Thermophilic Aerobic Oxidation (TAO) System to Anaerobic Digestate Stabilization in Korea vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11109/JAES.2015.21.1.21