디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제11권12호
  • /
  • Pages.639-647
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정신장애인의 회복측정도구 개발

The Development of a Mental Disorder Recovery Scale

  • 투고 : 2013.11.22
  • 심사 : 2013.12.20
  • 발행 : 2013.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 정신장애인의 회복을 측정하는 도구를 개발하고 타당도와 신뢰도를 검정하는 방법론적 연구이다. 3회에 걸친 요인 분석 후 고유값이 1.0이상인 요인이 총 3개 추출되었고 설명력은 58.1%였으며 모든 항목이 공통성과 요인적재량의 기준에 적합하여 삭제되는 문항이 없어 최종 25개 문항이 선정되었다. 준거타당도 검정에서는 Pearson 상관계수는 .71로 유의하였으며(p<.01) 각 요인과도 유의하게 상관관계를 보였다(p<.01). 신뢰도 검정 결과 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ 계수는 .95였으며 각 요인별 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ 계수는 .87에서 .93까지 분포하였다. 본 연구를 통해 개발된 3개 요인 25개 문항의 정신장애인의 회복 측정도구는 타당도와 신뢰도가 모두 검정된 도구이므로 정신장애인을 대상으로 하는 실무 및 연구영역에서 활용하여 회복을 촉진하도록 하는데 도움이 될 수 있을 것이다.

This paper is a methodological research aimed at developing a mental disorder recovery scale (MDRS) and testing its validity and reliability. After three sessions of factor analysis, a total of three factors using an Eigen value of 1.0 or more were drawn. The explanatory power was found to be 58.1%. All the items met the criteria for communality and factor loading with no item removed, and, ultimately, 25 items were selected. Criterion-related validity test showed that Pearson's correlation coefficient was significant at .71 (p<.01) with significant correlation with each factor (p<.01). The reliability test showed that Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficient was .95 and that Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficient for each factor ranged from .87 to .93. MDRS, which was developed in this study and possessing 3 factors and 25 items, had both its validity and reliability confirmed; therefore, the developed scale would be useful to evaluate the recovery of individuals with mental disorder.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. P. E. Deegan, Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 11-19, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099565
  2. H. Henderson, From depths of despair to heights of recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 83-87, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2975/28.2004.85.87
  3. E. Leete, How I perceive and manage my illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 197-200, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/15.2.197
  4. S. Mead, M. E. Copeland, What recovery means to us: Consumers' perspectives. Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 315-328, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001917516869
  5. S. Y. Hwang, The perception of recovery: Perspectives from people with mental illness. Mental Health & Social Work, Vol. 27, pp. 28-63, 2007.
  6. G. O. Song, Validation of the Korean version of the mental health recovery measure. Mental Health & Social Work, Vol. 34, pp. 154-188, 2010.
  7. S. I. Kang, Influential Factors for the Recovery Process of People with Mental Disorder: the mediation effects of ego-identity on integration with local community. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Catholic University, Seoul. 2013.
  8. E. O. John, R. G. Donald, The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports, Vol 10, pp. 799-812. 1962. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799
  9. E. Jean, L. S. Robert, L. F. Joseph, C. Jacob, The global assessment scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance, Arch Gen Psychiatry, Vol 33, No. 6, pp. 766-771. 1976. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012
  10. R. O. Ralph, K. Kindder, D. Phillips, Can we measure recovery? Cambridge: Human Services Research Institute, 2000.
  11. G. Dickens, Mental health outcome measures in the age of recovery-based services. British Journal of Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 15, pp. 940-943, 2009. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2009.18.15.43564
  12. S. Essock, L. Sederer, Editorial: Understanding and measuring recovery. Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 279-281, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn185
  13. J. G. Yoon, A study on the attitudes toward recovery of the mentally challenged:focusing on the validation and utilization of a Korean version of the recovery attitudes questionnaire-16. Master's thesis, Catholic University, Seoul. 2012.
  14. J. K. Bae, Attitude of recovery and quality of life of persons with psychiatric disabilities-Focused on scale development and model testing- Ph.D. dissertation, Keimyung University, Daegu. 2005.
  15. E. O. Lee, N. Y. Lim, H. E. Park, I. S. Lee, J. I. Kim, J. I. Bae, et al, Nursing Research and Statistical Analysis. Paju: Soomoonsa, 2009.
  16. S. H. Kook, C. N. Son, The development of Happy-QoL scale for assessing the quality of life in patient with schizophrenic disorder. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 665-691, 2001.
  17. P. Allot, L. Loganathan, B. Fulford, Discovering hope for recovery. Journal of Community Mental Health, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 1-22, 2002.
  18. N. Jacobson, D. Greenley, What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication. Psychiatric Services, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 482-485, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.482
  19. L. W. Jensen, T. A. Wadkins, Mental health success stories: Finding path to recovery. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 28, pp. 325-340, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840701244086
  20. G. Browne, M. Hemsely, W. S. John, Consumer perspectives on recovery: A focus on housing following discharge from hospital. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 17, pp. 402 -409, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00575.x
  21. M. K. Smith, Recovery from a severe psychiatric disability: Findings of a qualitative study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 149-158, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095105
  22. M. Y. Kim, A structural model of recovery among people with mental illness. Ph.D. dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 2011.
  23. W. P. Sullivan, Along and winding road: The process of recovery from severe mental illness. Innovation & Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 19-27, 1994.
  24. P. H. Lysaker, D. Roe, P. T. Yanos, Toward understanding the insight paradox: Internalized stigma moderates the association between insight and social functioning, hope and self-esteem among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 192-199, 2007.
  25. S. L. Young, D. S. Ensing, Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1-28, 1999.
  26. K. S. Shim, S. I. Song, A study on the recognition of mental health professionals for the recovery of persons with mental disabilities. Mental Health & Social Work, Vol. 32, pp. 78-105, 2009.
  27. S. H. Lee, A study on factors affecting the rehabilitation for the people with mental disorder-Focusing on the recovery factors-. Master's thesis, Catholic University, Seoul. 2010.