디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제11권11호
  • /
  • Pages.169-175
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스마트 유연근무제 유형에 관한 연구

Clustering Analysis of Smart Flexible Work Arranagement

  • 투고 : 2013.11.01
  • 심사 : 2013.11.20
  • 발행 : 2013.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

스마트 유연근무는 개인이 직장과 가정에서 요구되는 역할 균형을 가능하도록 하는 주요 정책수단으로 최근 관심을 받아 왔다. 본 연구는 유연근무를 시범적으로 시행하고 있는 광역자치단체 공무원들을 대상으로 스마트 유연근무제 유형에 대해 살펴보고, 조직단위 별 스마트 유연근무 유형을 분석하고 근로 장소 유연성, 근로시간 유연성 과 근로 장소 및 시간 융합 유연성 등 스마트 유연근무제 유형별 성공요인을 분석하였다. 분석결과 직장영역과 가정영역 별 유연근무의 특성에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났고 구체적으로 가정 및 직장 융합 영역이 유연근무에 가장 중요한 성공요인으로 밝혀졌으며 이에 따른 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다.

Smart flexible work has been a topic of considerable interest to researchers, practitioners, and public policy advocates as a tool to help individuals manage work and family roles. In this study, we investigated the types of smart flexible work arrangement and analyzed the organizational units associated with it. We found that the critical success factors of smart flexible work and the specific types of flexibility make a difference in the effects found. And we proposed on the direction of policy promotion that can contribute to the introduction of smart flexible work.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen TD, Shockley K., Flexible work arrangements: Help or hype? In Crane R, Hill J (Eds.), Handbook of families and work: Interdisciplinary perspectives Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 265-284, 2009.
  2. Byron K., A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 169-198, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009
  3. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA., The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 1524-1541, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
  4. Hill EJ, Grzywacz JG, Allen S, Blanchard VL, Matz-Costa C, Shulkin S, Pitt-Catsouphes M, Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work & Family, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 149-163, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802024678
  5. Kossek EE, Baltes BB Matthews RA, How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 352-359, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x
  6. Kyoo-Sung Noh, Seong-Hwan Ju, Jin-Taek Jung, An Exploratory Study on Concept and Realization Conditions of Smart Learning, The Journal of Digital Policy and Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1-10, 2011.
  7. Mesmer-Magnus JR, Viswesvaran C., How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conflict: A meta-analytic examination, Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 555-574, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-006-1020-1
  8. Michel JS, Kotrba LM, Mitchelson JK, Clark MA, Baltes BB., Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 689-725, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.695
  9. Porter S, Ayman R, Work flexibility as a mediator of the relationship between work-family conflict and the intention to quit, Journal of Management and Organization, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 414-424, 2010.
  10. Shockley KM, Allen TD, Investigating the missing link in flexible work arrangement utilization: An individual difference perspective, Journal of Vocational Behavior, VOl. 76, No. 1, pp. 131-142, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.07.002