DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Different Levels of Dietary Crude Protein on Egg Production and Quality in Laying Hens during Early Stage of Egg Production

산란초기의 사료 내 조단백질 수준에 따른 계란 생산성 및 품질에 미치는 영향

  • Choo, Yun Kyung (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyung Joo (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Oh, Sung Taek (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Yong Ran (Division of Animal Husbandry, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Kim, Eun Jib (Division of Animal Husbandry, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Kim, Dong Wook (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Chang Won (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • An, Byoung Ki (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 추연경 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 권형주 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 오성택 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김용란 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김은집 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김동욱 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 강창원 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 안병기 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2013.10.31
  • Accepted : 2013.12.04
  • Published : 2013.12.30

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine optimum levels of dietary crude protein for productivity and egg quality in laying hens during early stage. A total of seven hundred and twenty 24-wk-old Hy-Line Variety Brown layers were randomly assigned to 4 experimental diets varying with 16%, 17%, 18%, and 19% CP and fed the diets for 12 wks. There were no significant differences in egg production, daily egg mass and feed intake among experimental diets. Although no difference was found on egg weight among experimental diets, decreasing levels of dietary crude protein tended to reduce the egg weight. Haugh unit and egg shell quality were not affected by different levels of dietary crude protein. Although there was no difference on yolk color among experimental diets, increasing levels of dietary crude protein slightly reduced the yolk color. It is concluded that laying hens did not need more than 16% CP to maximize egg production.

본 시험은 산란 초기에 있어 조단백질 수준이 미치는 영향을 조사함으로 산란 초기 사료 내 적정 단백질 수준을 제시하기 위한 목적으로 실시하였다. 공시 동물은 22주령 Hy-Line 갈색계를 이용하여 동일한 면적의 케이지에 모두 4개 처리구에 9반복, 반복당 20수씩 총 720수를 선발하여 2주간 일반 시판 사료로 예비 사육하였으며, 처리구별 산란율과 체중이 유사하도록 재배치한 후 총 12주간 사육하며, 조단백질 수준이 난생산성 및 품질 변화에 미치는 영향을 관찰하였다. 사료 섭취량의 경우 조단백질 수준에 따른 유의적인 차이가 나타나지 않았으나, 조단백질 16% 처리구의 경우 다소 낮은 섭취량을 나타내었다. 산란율에 있어 조단백질 수준에 따른 유의적인 차이가 나타나지 않았으나, 조단백질 16% 사료를 급여할 경우에도 산란율 95% 수준을 유지할 수 있는 결과를 보였다. 난중의 경우, 조단백질 19%를 제외하고, 조단백질 16~18%에서 선형적으로 증가하는 경향을 보였으나, 조단백질 수준에 따른 유의적인 차이가 나타나지는 않았다. 난질 항목에 있어 Haugh unit, 난각 두께 및 강도의 경우 조단백질 수준에 따른 유의적인 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 난황색에서 조단백질 수준에 따른 유의적인 차이가 나타나지 않았으나, 조단백질 수준이 증가할수록 난황색이 옅어지는 경향을 발견할 수 있었다. 따라서 본 연구는 한국사양표준 2차 개정판(2012)에서 규정하고 있는 주요 아미노산(Lys, TSAA, Thr) 수준을 유지하고, 사료 섭취량이 105 g 이상의 조건이라면 조단백질 16% 수준으로도 초기의 난 생산성 및 품질에 큰 문제는 없을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blair R, Jacob JP, Ibrahim S, Wang P 1999 A quantitative assessment of reduced protein diets and supplements to improve nitrogen utilization. J Appl Poult Res 8:25-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/8.1.25
  2. Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  3. El Zubeir EA, Mohammed OA 1993 Dietary protein and energy effects on reproductive characteristics of commercial egg type pullets reared in arid hot climate. Anim Feed Sci Technol 41:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90121-Y
  4. Grobas S, Mendez J, De Blas C, Mateos GG 1999 Laying hen productivity as affected by energy, supplemental fat and linoleic acid concentration of the diet. Poultry Sci 78:1542-1551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.11.1542
  5. Gunawardana P, Roland DA, Bryant MM 2008 Effect of energy and protein on performance, egg components, egg solids, egg quality and profits in molted Hy-Line W-36 hens. J Appl Poult Res 17:432-439. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00085
  6. Harms RH, Russell GB 1993 Optimizing egg mass with amino acid supplementation of a low-protein diet. Poultry Sci 72:1892-1896. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721892
  7. Haugh RR 1937 The haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg Poult Sci 43:552-555, 572-573.
  8. Hy-Line International 2006 Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Management Guide, 2004-2006. Hy-Line Int., West Des Moines, IA, USA.
  9. Karunajeewa H 1972 Effect of protein and energy levels on laying performance of strains of different body weights. Anim Prod Sci 12:385-391. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9720385
  10. Keshavarz K 1984 The effect of different dietary protein levels in the rearing and laying periods on performance of White Leghorn chickens. Poultry Sci 63:2229-2240. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0632229
  11. Keshavarz K, Jackson ME 1992 Performance of growing pullets and laying hens fed low-protein, amino acid-supplemented diets. Poultry Sci 71:905-918. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710905
  12. Keshavarz K, Nakajima S 1995 The effect of dietary manipulations of energy, protein, and fat during the growing and laying periods on early egg weight and egg components. Poultry Sci 74:50-61. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740050
  13. Khajali F, Faraji M, Dehkordi SK 2007 Effects of reducedprotein diets at constant total sulfur amino acids: Lysine ratio on pullet development and subsequent laying hen performance Am J Anim Vet Sci 2:89-92. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2007.89.92
  14. Leeson S, Caston LJ 1997 A problem with characteristics of the thin albumen in laying hens. Poultry Sci 76:1332-1336. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.10.1332
  15. Leeson S, Summers JD 1987 Effect of immature body weight on laying performance. Poultry Sci 66:1924-1928. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661924
  16. Leeson S, Summers JD 2001 Nutrition of the Chicken. 4th ed. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  17. Liu Z, Wu G, Bryant MM, Roland DA 2004 Influence of added synthetic lysine for first phase second cycle commercial Leghorns with the methionine + cysteine / lysine ratio maintained at 0.75. Int J Poult Sci 3:220-207. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.220.227
  18. Lopez G, Leeson S 1995 Response of broiler breeders to low-protein diets. 1. Adult breeder performance. Poultry Sci 74:685-695. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740685
  19. Masahiro T, Yamazaki M, Murakami H, Ishikawa S 1999 Effect of dietary fat on carotene content in egg yolk and egg yolk color. Jpn Poult Sci 36:329-335. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.36.329
  20. Morihiro K, Yamazaki M, Murakami H, Tsuro M 2001 Effect of dietary fat source on ${\beta}$-carotene content in egg yolk and egg yolk color. Jpn Poult Sci 38:160-166. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.38.160
  21. NRC 1994 Nutrient Requirement of Poultry. National Academic Press, Washington DC. USA.
  22. Novak C, Yakout HM, Scheideler SE 2006 The effect of dietary protein level and total sulfur amino acid : lysine ratio on egg production parameters and egg yield in Hy-Line W-98 hens. Poultry Sci 85:2195-2206. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.12.2195
  23. Novak CL, Yakout HM, Remus J 2008 Response to varying dietary energy and protein with or without enzyme supplementation on Leghorn performance and economics. 2. Laying Period. J Appl Poult Res 17:17-33. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2006-00126
  24. Parsons CM, Koelkebeck KW, Zhang Y, Wang X, Leeper RW 1993 Effect of dietary protein and added fat levels on performance of young laying hens. J Appl Poult Res 2: 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/2.3.214
  25. Perez-Bonilla A, Jabbour C, Frikha M, Mirzaie S, Garcia J, Mateos GG 2012 Effect of crude protein and fat content of diet on productive performance and egg quality traits of brown egg-laying hens with different initial body weight. Poultry Sci 91:1400-1405. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01917
  26. Prochaska JF, Carey JB, Shafer DJ 1996 The effect of Llysine intake on egg component yield and composition in laying hens. Poultry Sci 75:1268-1277. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751268
  27. Roberts SA, Xin H, Kerr BJ, Russell JR, Bregendahl K 2007 Effects of dietary fiber and reduced crude protein on ammonia emission from laying-hen manure. Poultry Sci 86: 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.8.1625
  28. SAS Institute Inc. 2002 SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
  29. Scheideler SE, Froning GW 1996 The combined influence of dietary flaxseed variety, level, form, and storage conditions on egg production and composition among vitamin E-supplemented hens. Poultry Sci 75:1221-1226. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751221
  30. Scheideler SE, Jaroni D, Froning GW 1998 Strain and age effects on egg composition from hens fed diets rich in n-3 fatty acids. Poultry Sci 77:192-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.2.192
  31. Shim MY, Song E, Billard L, Aggrey SE, Pesti GM, Sodsee P 2013 Effects of balanced dietary protein levels on egg production and egg quality parameters of individual commercial layers. Poultry Sci 92:2687-2696. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02569
  32. Sikder AC, Chowdhury SD, Rashid MH, Sarker AK, Das SC 1998 Use of dried carrot meal(DCM) in laying hen diet for egg yolk pigmentation. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 11: 239-244. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1998.239
  33. Sohail SS, Bryant MM, Roland DA, Apajalahti JHA, Pierson EEM 2003 Influence of Avizyme 1500 on performance of commercial Leghorns. J Appl Poult Res 12:284-290. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/12.3.284
  34. Wu G, Bryant MM, Voitle RA, Roland DA 2005 Effect of dietary energy on performance and egg composition of Bovans White and Dekalb White hens during phase I. Poultry Sci 84:1610-1615. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.10.1610
  35. 신호용 한인규 최윤재 이규호 1989 산란계용 사료의 계절별 적정에너지 및 단백질 급여수준 결정을 위한 연구. 한국영양사료학회 학술발표회 51-52.
  36. 한국사양표준(가금) 2012 농림부 농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원.