DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Various Energy and Protein Concentrations in Diets on the Performance, Bone Mineral Density and Blood Characteristics of Broiler Chicks

  • Received : 2013.11.14
  • Accepted : 2013.12.16
  • Published : 2013.12.30

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted separately with different concentration of dietary energy and protein to evaluate the performance, blood characteristics and bone mineral density (BMD) of broiler chicks. In experimentr 1, a total of 480 heads one-day-old Ross ${\times}$ Ross broiler chicks were randomly divided into 6 treatments (5 replications; 16 birds/pen). Three concentration of ME (3,000, 3,100 and 3,200 kcal/kg) and two of CP (pre-starter 22, 23%, starter 20, 21% and finisher 18, 19%) in a $3{\times}2$ factorial arrangement of treatments were used. In experiment 2, similar chicks and CP concentration was used but ME concentration was changed (pre-starter; 3,000, 3,050 and 3,100 kcal/kg, starter; 3,050, 3,100 and 3,150 kcal/kg, finisher; 3,100, 3,150 and 3,200 kcal/kg) in the diet. In both experiments, 10 blood and tibia samples were collected per treatment and blood characteristics and BMD were analyzed. In experiment 1, weight gain and feed intake were increased by the 3,000 kcal/kg ME in the diet (P<0.05). Serum total protein and albumin levels were increased numerically with the level of CP in the diet. Total cholesterol and HDL content were increased numerically with the energy content in the diet. Consistently in experiment 2, weight gain was increased numerically by the energy and protein level (prestarter $3,000{\times}23$, starter $3,050{\times}21$ and finisher 3,100 kcal/kg ME and 19% CP) in the diet. Serum glucose level was increased with the energy level in the diet (P<0.05). Therefore, serum total protein, albumin, triglycerides, total cholesterol and HDL contents were tended to increase with the energy increments in the diet.

본 실험은 육계의 서로 다른 농도의 에너지와 단백질이 생산성과 혈액성상 및 BMD에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 두 차례 실시하였다. 실험 1에서 총 480수의 Ross ${\times}$ Ross 병아리를 무작위로 6처리구(5반복; 16수/펜)로 나누어 배치하였다. 처리구는 사료 내 ME는 3,000, 3,100, 3,200 kcal/kg 수준으로 하였고 CP는 초기 22, 23%, 전기 20, 21%, 후기 18, 19% 수준으로 하였다. 실험 2에서는 실험 1과 유사하게 병아리와 CP를 적용하였으며, 사료 내 ME 수준을 변형하였다(초기 : 3,000, 3,050, 3,100 kcal/kg, 전기 : 3,050, 3,100, 3,150 kcal/kg, 후기 : 3,100, 3,150, 3,200 kcal/kg). 두 실험에서 처리구당 10수씩 혈액과 경골 샘플을 채취하였고, 혈액성상과 BMD를 분석하였다. 실험 1에서 증체량과 사료섭취량은 3,000 kcal/kg의 에너지를 급여한 처리구에서 증가되었다(P<0.05). 혈청 총 단백질과 albumin 농도는 CP의 수준이 증가함에 따라 수치적으로 증가하였다. 총 콜레스테롤과 HDL의 함유량은 에너지 함유량의 증가에 따라 수치적으로 증가하였다. 실험 2에서 증체량은 일관되게 에너지와 단백질 수준의 증가에 따라 수치적으로 증가하였다(초기 $3,000{\times}23$, 전기 $3,050{\times}21$, 후기 3,100 kcal/kg ME와 19% CP). 혈청 glucose 수준은 에너지 수준이 높아짐에 따라 증가됐다(P<0.05). 따라서 혈청 총 단백질, albumin, triglycerides, 총 콜레스테롤 그리고 HDL 함유량은 사료 에너지 증가에 따라 증가하는 경향이 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bartov I, Bornstein S, Lipstein B 1974 Effect of calorie to protein ratio on the degree of fatness in broilers fed on practical diets. Br Poult Sci 15: 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667408416084
  2. Griffiths L, Leeson S, Summers JD 1977 Fat deposition in broilers: Effect of dietary energy to protein balance and early life caloric restriction on productive performance and abdominal fat pad size. Poult Sci 56: 638-646. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0560638
  3. Hidalgo MA, Dozier III WA, Davis AJ, Gordon RW 2004 Live performance and meat yield responses to progressive concentrations of dietary energy at a constant metabolizable energy-to-crude protein ratio. J Appl Poult Res 13: 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.2.319
  4. Jang IS, Kang SY, Ko YH, Moon YS, Sohn SH 2009 Effect of qualitative and quantitative feed restriction on growth performance and immune function in broiler chickens. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 22: 388-395. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80513
  5. Kermanshahi H, Ziaei N, Pilevar M 2011 Effect of dietary crude protein fluctuation on performance, blood parameters and nutrients retention in broiler chicken during starter period. Global Vet 6: 162-167.
  6. Kwon S, Lee B-K, Kim, H-S 2009 Relation between nutritional factors and bone status by broadband ultrasound attenuation among college students. J Korean Sco. Food Sci Nutr 38(11): 1551-1558. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.11.1551
  7. Leeson S, Caston L, Summers JD 1996a Broiler response to diet energy. Poult Sci 75: 529-535. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750529
  8. Leeson S, Caston L, Summers JD 1996b Broiler response to energy or energy and protein dilution in the finisher diet. Poult Sci 75: 522-528. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750522
  9. Nahashon SN, Adefope N, Amenyenu A, Wright D 2005 Effects of dietary metabolizaable and crude protein concentrations growth performance and carcasss characteristics of French guinea broilers. Poultry Sci 84: 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.337
  10. NRC 1994 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
  11. Pesti GM 2009 Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feed on biological performance. J Appl Poult Res 18: 478-486.
  12. Rosebrough RW, Steele NC, 1985 Energy and protein relationships in the broiler. 1. Effect of protein levels and feeding regimens on growth, body composition and in vitro lipogenesis of broiler chicks. Poult Sci 64(1): 119-26. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0640119
  13. Saleh EA, Watkins SE, Waldroup AL, Waldroup PW 2004a Consideration for dietary nutrient and energy feeding programs for growing large male broilers chickens for further processing. Int J Poult Sci 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.1.10
  14. Saleh EA, Watkins SE, Waldroup AL, Waldroup PW 2004b Effects of dietary nutrient density on performance and carcass quality of male broilers grown for further processing. Int J Poult Sci 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.1.10
  15. SAS Institute 2002 Guide for Personal Computers, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  16. Steel RGD, Torrie JH 1980 Analysis of Covariance. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York. pp. 401-437.
  17. Shah M, Garg A 1996 High fat and high-carbohydrate diets and energy balance. Diabetes Care 19: 1142-52. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.19.10.1142
  18. Sizemore FG, Siegel HS 1993 Growth, feed conversion and carcass composition in females of four broiler crosses fed starter diets with different energy levels and energy to protein ratios. Poult Sci 72: 2216-2228. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0722216
  19. Son Sook Mee, Ye Na Chun 2004 Association between bone mineral density and bone nutrition indicators in elderly residing in low income area of the city. J Korean Soc. Food Sci Nutr 33(1): 107-113. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.1.107
  20. Sterling KG, Pesti GM, Bakalli RI 2003 Performance of broiler chicks fed various levels dietary lysine crude protein. Poultry Sci 82: 1939-1947. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1939
  21. Swennen Q, Janssens GPJ, Millet S, Vansant G, Decuypere E, Buyse J 2005 Effects of substitution between fat and protein on feed intake and its regulatory mechanisms in broiler chickens: Endocrine functioning and intermediary metabolism. Poult Sci 84: 1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.7.1051
  22. Tumova E, Teimouri A, 2010. Fat deposition in the broiler chicken: A review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 41: 121-128.

Cited by

  1. Effects of early energy and protein restriction on growth performance, clinical blood parameters, carcass yield, and tibia parameters of broilers vol.15, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61234-5