DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of Scoring System by Issues as well as Criteria in the Green Building Certification System for Office Building

업무용 친환경건축물의 득점체계 개선에 관한 연구

  • 모혜란 (충북대학교 대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 문미선 (충남대학교 대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 한찬훈 (충북대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 태춘섭 (한국에너지기술연구원)
  • Received : 2012.09.20
  • Accepted : 2012.10.22
  • Published : 2012.10.30

Abstract

The purpose of Green Building Certification System is to promote the environment-friendly building construction as the life-cycle environmental performance of a certain building is assessed and certified nationally(domestically). By the way, a building can get the green building certificate just with the minimum standard in prerequisite assessment criteria and with the designated scores in totals. GBCS consists of 9 assessment issues and it has 4 grades. Nevertheless the 1st. grade green building has uneven scores in each issue. In other words, it has even 0 point in a special issue. Due to the above problem, the discrimination and reliability in the GBCS grading and scoring has to be secured. This study aims at a new grading and scoring system equipped with the discrimination and reliability through analysing the scores of prerequisite assessment criteria and the scores by issues in the actually certified green office buildings.

Keywords

References

  1. Mo H. R., Park S. D., Haan C. H., Tae C. S., A Study on the Improvement of Grading and Scoring in the Green Building Certification System for Office Building, Proceeding of Autumn Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, V.32, N. 2 (Expected)
  2. Jung Y. H., Kim J. Y., Paik H. S. and Song O. H., A study on the improvement of green building rating system through analysis of each assessment item of KGBCC certified apartments, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 53-60
  3. Kim S. Y., Kim H. B., A study on the improvement of Korea Green Building Certification System by the comparison with BREEAM and LEED, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, Vol. 26, No.12, pp. 271-278
  4. Kim D.H., Cho D.W. and Yu K. H., A Study on assessment results of Green Building Certification Criteria according to use, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.323-330
  5. Jung J. N., A study on the integrated model of the environmental performance assessment criteria for buildings, 2011
  6. Kim Y. S., Jung J. N., Lee S. H. and Park S. D., A study on selecting the prerequisite items in the Green Building Certification Criteria for schools, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 59-66
  7. http://www.mltm.go.kr/, Korea Green Building Certification System
  8. http://www.metro.daejeon.kr/, Daejeon Green Building Certification System, 2012. 9. 4.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Score of Issues by Certification Grade in the G-SEED for Office Buildings vol.36, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7836/kses.2016.36.5.009
  2. 박형 태양전지모듈 제작을 위한 저온 CP 공정 최적화에 관한 연구 vol.37, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7836/kses.2017.37.2.077