References
- 김정환, 박도영 (2001). 학습자의 지.정.의 특성과 학업성취도에 대한 구조방정식 모형. 교육학 연구, 39(1), 147-166.
- 박종원 (2003). 학생개념의 연속적 세련화와 정교화를 통한 변화 과정-대학생반응 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), 276-285.
- 서혜애 (2004). 과학적 창의성과 과학영재교육의 방향. 영재교육연구, 14(1), 65-89.
- 이정숙, 원복순, 김소연, 김중복 (2009). 비전형적 상황에서의 전기 회로에 관한 초등학생들의 인식. 새물리, 58(2), 101-109.
- 이정철, 강순민, 허옹욱 (2009). 한국과학영재학교 학생들의 과학적 태도, 학습양식, 선호하는 수업형태와 수업환경 조사를 통한 수업전략의 수립. 영재교육연구, 19(1), 138-159.
- 한순미 (1997). 역동적 평가의 문제와 발전방안. 교육평가연구, 10(2), 53-79.
- 홍준의, 이인호, 전영석 (2007). 초등학교 과학영재 학생의 탐구능력 수행 분석. 초등과학교육, 26(3), 267-275.
- Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hebert, T. P. (1994). Reversing under achievement: Stories of success. Educational Leadership, 52(3). 48-53.
- Brown, A.L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development: In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bull, K. S., Shuler, P., Overton, R., Kimball, S., Boykin, C., & Griffin, J. (1999). Process for Developing Scaffolding in a Computer Mediated Learning Environment. Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education(ACRES). 19, Albuquerque, New Maxico.
- Chi, M. T., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon, & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (1997). Determining and interpreting resistive electric circuits concepts test ver.1.2. North Carolina: North Carolina State University.
- Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school Students' Conceptual Difficulties and Attempts at Conceptual Change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801891908
- Havu, S. (2005). Examining young children's conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructive perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243736
- Heller, P., & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case-study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290306
- Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (2006). An Alternative Approach to the Identification of Gifted Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners: The Contribution of Dynamic Assessment. Gifted education international, 21(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940602100307
- Magnusson, S. J., Templin, M., & Boyle, R. A. (1997). Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Science, 6(1), 91-142. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0601_5
- Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. London: Aspen Systems Corporation.
- Mansfield, R., & Busse, J. (1981). The Psychlogy if Greatinity and Discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
- McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596593
- Millar, R., & Beh, K. L. (1993). Students' understanding of voltage in simple parallel electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150401
- Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic Assessment: An International Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential. NY: Guilford Press.
- National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washingtion, DC: National Academy Press.
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
- Shaffer, P. S., & Mcdermott, L. C. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60, 994-1003. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003
- Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1990), Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347-362.
- Shipstone, D. M., Rhoneck, C. V., Jung, W., Karrqvist, C., Dupin, J. J., Johsua, S., & Licht, P. (1988). A study of students' understanding of electricity in five European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100306
- Stanley, N. V., Seigel, j, Cooper, L., & Marshall, K. (1995). Identification of gifted with the Dynamic Assessment Prcedure. Gifted Education International, 10(2), 85-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949501000209
- Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I., (1993). Creative giftedness: A multi-variate investment approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700102
- Troxclair, D. A. (2000). Differentiating instruction for gifted students in regular education social studies classes. Roeper Review, 22(3), 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554033
- Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer academic publishers.
- Webb, P. (1992). Primary science teachers'understandings of electric current. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140405