Journal of Korean Medical classics (대한한의학원전학회지)

The Society of Korean Medical Classics (대한한의학원전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Medical Dispute between Korean and Western Medicine in 1950s Examined through "EE LIM"

"의림(醫林)"지(誌)를 통해 살펴본 1950년대 동서의학 논쟁

  • Lee, Tae-Hyung (Dept. of Medical History, College of Korean Medicine, KyungHee University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Woo (Dept. of Anthropology, ChonNam National University) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Il (Dept. of Medical History, College of Korean Medicine, KyungHee University)
  • 이태형 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 김태우 (전남대학교 인류학과) ;
  • 김남일 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실)
  • Received : 2012.07.20
  • Accepted : 2012.08.17
  • Published : 2012.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Although the government acknowledged Korean Medical Doctors as official health care providers since 1951, criticism regarding its modernity persisted. This paper focuses on the medical dispute between Korean and Western Medicine in 1950s risen from the problem of modernization of Korean Medicine. Method: This paper looked into the medical dispute between Korean and Western Medicine in 1950s through "EE LIM". "EE LIM" is a scholarly journal published by Korean Medical doctor Bae Won-Sik. Articles regarding the medical dispute between Korean and Western Medicine were selected, categorized and analyzed. Result: The main questions against Korean Medicine were: whether it was scientific or not, and whether there was a possibility of systematization. Several opinions were brought up on these issues. 1) Some people criticized Korean Medicine as being unscientific based on modern science. 2) Others emphasized the identity of Korean Medicine against the critics. 3) Another group of people wanted to study Korean Medicine using modern methods and obtain merits from both sides. Conclusion: The different understanding of the term 'science' led to diverse discussions on the direction of Korean Medicine's progression. The narrow meaning of science only considers Korean Medicine as an object of modern scientific and medical study. But if the meaning is broadened, containing empirical aspects, Korean Medicine can be included as a category of science based on its clinical utility.

Keywords

References

  1. 이태형. 보완대체의학 및 통합의학의 정의에 대한 고찰. 경희대학교 석사학위논문. 2011. p.1.
  2. 정기용. 해방 후 한의사 제도 성립 과정 -1951년 국민의료법 법안 제정을 중심으로-. 경원대학교 석사학위논문. 2007.
  3. 裵元植. 創刊辭. 醫林. 1954. 1호. p.1.
  4. 趙玄成. 今後漢醫學의 展望. 醫林. 1955. 5호. p.4.
  5. 金庚烈. 세계문화와 동방의학. 醫林. 1956. 13호. pp.7-8.
  6. 金衡翼. 내가 본 漢方醫學. 醫林. 1958. 15호. p.6.
  7. 李殷八. 漢醫學에 對한 새로운 思考方式(上). 醫林. 1958. 14호. pp.10-11.
  8. 許松菴. 漢方醫學의 歷史的由來(上). 醫林. 1958. 16.17호. pp.19-22.
  9. 車日甫. 神秘主義醫學의 批判과 漢醫學의 去就. 醫林. 1958. 18.19호. pp.9-14.
  10. 白泰炯. 漢醫學에 對한 考察. 醫林. 1954. 1호. pp.3-4.
  11. 崔海鍾. 陰陽學의 現實性. 醫林. 1955. 10호. p.4.
  12. 咸珍求. 東西醫學對論(3). 醫林. 1955. 11호. pp.21-22.
  13. 姜承熙. 命門三焦圖理解의 基礎槪論(一). 醫林. 1955. 12호. p.17.
  14. 洪一善. 虛實論에 對하여 醫林. 1958. 22.23호. pp.30-31.
  15. 姜永熙. 漢醫學體系樹立小考 (陰陽五行의 氣化學과 生理學의 關聯性). 醫林. 1955. 4호. pp.3-4.
  16. 姜承熙. 漢醫學體系樹立의 新學說(1). 醫林. 1958. 18.19호. pp.41-42.
  17. 柳大馨. 漢醫學에 대한 새로운 思考方式(下). 醫林. 1958. 15호. pp.13-17.
  18. 李尙熙. 古醫書를 批評 修改하라. 醫林. 1956. 13호. p.23.
  19. 申鉉德. 時代性과 漢方診療方式(上). 醫林. 1958. 14호. pp.4-6.
  20. 韓世靖. 漢方診斷法의 要綱. 醫林. 1958. 16.17 호. pp.6-7.
  21. 張載湳. 漢方醫의 根源이 되는 陰陽說(1). 醫林. 1958. 22.23호. pp.34-35.
  22. 河銀鑄. 漢醫學의 哲學性. 醫林. 1958. 18.19호. pp.24-29.
  23. J.U.S. 獨逸 漢醫學 소식. 醫林. 1955. 3호. p.15.
  24. 鄭亨模. 내가 본 漢方醫學. 醫林. 1956. 13호. pp.12-13.
  25. 柳大馨. 漢醫學에 대한 새로운 思考方式(上). 醫林. 1958. 14호. pp.7-9.
  26. 李殷八. 漢醫學에 對한 새로운 思考方式(下). 醫林. 1958. 15호. pp.21-24.
  27. 맹웅재 외 15人. 한의학통사. 경기도. 대성의학사. 2006. p.516,
  28. 김남일. 근현대 한의학 인물실록. 경기도. 도서출판 들녘. 2011. pp.234-236.