Feeding Habits of the Kaloula borealis during the Breeding Season

번식기간중 맹꽁이(Kaloula borealis)의 먹이 습성

  • 고상범 (제주대학교 과학교육학과) ;
  • 장민호 (국립공원관리공단 국립공원연구원) ;
  • 양경식 (제주테크노파크 생물종다양성연구소) ;
  • 오홍식 (제주대학교 과학교육학과)
  • Received : 2012.02.19
  • Accepted : 2012.05.26
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

To investigate the feeding habits of the Kaloula borealis, the stomach contents of 52 out of 56 specimens collected around Daejung-up, Jeju Island in June 2011 were studied. The stomach contents were analyzed with the stomach flushing method. According to the results, the main preys of the Kaloula borealis were Diptera sp., Harpalidae, Formicidae and Drosophilidae. the Kaloula borealis of all sizes fed on small preys, while individuals with large SVL fed on big preys. By feeding on a large amount of food with a small number of activities, the individuals with large SVL is considered to enhance energy efficiency. In many cases, the Kaloula borealis fed on Diptera sp. or Drosophilidae, which are slow but active and capable of flying. As a result, the Kaloula borealis take the sit-and-wait form of preying rather than actively searching for food. The results of this research on feeding habits of the Kaloula borealis will provide valuable resources to protect the endangered Kaloula borealis experiencing a sharp decline in their population and to prepare plans for population preservation strategies for them.

맹꽁이(Kaloula borealis)의 먹이 습성을 밝히기 위하여 2011년 6월에 제주도 대정읍 일대에서 채집된 56개체에서 52개체의 먹이를 조사하였다. 위 속의 먹이는 Stomach Flushing Method를 이용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과, 맹꽁이(Kaloula borealis)의 주요 먹이는 파리류, 먼지벌레류, 개미류, 초파리류로 나타났다. 부피가 작은 먹이는 다양한 크기의 개체들이 포식을 하고 있으나, SVL이 큰 개체들은 부피가 큰 먹이들도 포식하여 에너지 효율성을 높이고 있다. 맹꽁이(Kaloula borealis)는 비행능력이 있고 활동적인 파리류나 초파리류를 먹이로 많이 이용하고 있는 것으로 보아 이들은 활발히 움직이면서 먹이를 포식하기보다는 기다리다가 포식하는 형태인 것으로 나타났다. 이번 연구를 통해 얻어진 맹꽁이(Kaloula borealis)의 먹이습성에 대한 연구 자료는 급격히 감소되어가는 이들의 보호와 개체군 보존전략에 대한 대안을 마련하는데 유용하게 활용될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, A.M., D.A, Haukos and J.T. Anderson(1999) Diet composition of three anurans from the Playa Wetlands of Northwest Texas. Copeia, Lawrence, pp. 515-520.
  2. Berry, P.Y.(1966) The food and feeding habits of the torrent frog, Amolops larutensis. Journal of Zoology, London, 149: 204-214.
  3. Christian, K.A.(1982) Changes in the food niche during postmetamorphic ontogeny of the frog Pseudacris triseriata. Copeia, pp. 73-80.
  4. Cicek, K. and A. Mermer( 2007) Food Composition of the Marsh Frog, Rana ridibunda Pallas, 1771, in Thrace. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 31: 83-90.
  5. Cross, C.L. and S.L. Gerstenberger(2002) Rana catesbeiana (American Bullfrog), Diet. Herpetological Review 33: 129-130.
  6. Duellman, W.E. and L. Trueb(1994) The Biology of Amphibians. New York, McGraw-Hill.
  7. Dunham, A.E.(1983) Realized niche overlap, resource abundance, and intensity of interspecific competition. In ""Lizard Ecology"" Ed by R.B. Huey, E.R. Pianka, T.W. Schoener, Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, pp. 261-280.
  8. Flowers, M.A. and B.M. Graves(1995) Prey selectivity and size-specific diet changes in Buffo cognatus and B. woodhousii during early postmetamorphic ontogeny. Journal of Herpetology 29: 608-612. https://doi.org/10.2307/1564745
  9. Grayson, K.L., L.W. Cook, M.J. Todd, D. Pierce, W.A. Hopkins, R.E. Gatten and M.E. Dorcas(2005) Effects of prey type on specific dynamic action, growth, and mass conversion efficiencies in the horned frog, Ceratophrys cranwelli. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 141: 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.05.052
  10. Hirai, T.(2002) Ontogenetic change in the diet of the pond frog, Rana nigromaculata. Ecological Research 17: 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00521.x
  11. Hirai, T. and M. Matsui(2000a) Myrmecophagy in a ranid frog Rana rugosa: Specialization or weak avoidance to ant eating? Zoological Science 17: 459-466.
  12. Hirai, T. and M. Matsui(2000b) Feeding habits of the pond frog, Rana nigromaculata, inhabiting rice fields in Kyoto, Japan. Copeia, pp. 940-947.
  13. Houston, W.W.K.(1973) The food of the common frog, Rana temporaria, on high moorland in northern England. Journal of Zoology, London, 171: 153-165.
  14. Ko, S.B., Y.M. Ko and H.S. Oh(2011) Distribution of Spawning Sites of Kaloula borealis in Jeju Island. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 25(6): 846-852. (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Krebs, J.R. and N.B. Davies(1997) Behavioral Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific, London.
  16. Labanick, G.M.(1976) Prey availability, consumption and selection in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans(Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Journal of Herpetology 10: 293-298. https://doi.org/10.2307/1563065
  17. Leclerc, J. and D. Courtois(1993) A simple stomach flushing method for ranid frogs. Herpetological Review 24: 142-143.
  18. Lima, A.P. and W.E. Magnusson(1998) Partitioning seasonal time: interactions among size, foraging activity and diet in leaf-litter frogs. Oecologia, Berlin, 116: 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050587
  19. Maeda, N. and M. Matsui(1999) Frogs and Toads of Japan. Rev Ed Bunichi Sogo Shuppan, Tokyo. (in Japanese with English abstract)
  20. Measey, G.J.(1998) Diet of feral Xenopus laevis(Daudin) in Wales, U.K. Journal of Zoology London 246: 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00159.x
  21. Newman, R.A.(1999) Body size and diet of recently metamorphosed spadefoot toads(Scaphiopus couchii). Herpetologica 55: 507-515.
  22. Scott, D.E. and M.R. Fore( 1995) The effect of food limitation on lipid levels, growth, and reproduction in the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum. Herpetologica 51: 462-471.
  23. Shine, R.(1979) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the amphibia. Copeia. 2: 469-474.
  24. Silva, E.T., E.P. Reis, R.N. Feio and O.P. Ribeiro-Filho( 2009) Diet of the invasive frog Lithobates catesbeianus(Shaw, 1802)(Anura: Ranidae) in Vicosa, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology 4: 286-294. https://doi.org/10.2994/057.004.0312
  25. Sole M., J. Ketterl, M. Di Bernardo and A. Kwet(2002) Ants and termits are the diet of the microhylid frog Elachistocleis ovalis(Schneider,799) at an Araucaria forest in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Herpetol. Bull. 79: 14-17.
  26. Parker, M.L. and M.I. Goldstein(2004) Diet of the Rio Granade Leopard Frog(Rana berlandieri) in Texas. Journal of Herpetology 38: 127-130. https://doi.org/10.1670/19-03N
  27. Teixeira, R.L., D. Vrcibradic and G.I. Almeida(2006) Food habits of Stereocyclops incrassatus(Anura, Microhylidae) from Povoaccaao, Espiirito Santo State, southeastern Brazil. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Professor Mello Leitaao. 19: 53-58.
  28. Toft, C.A.(1980) Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia, Berlin, 45: 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346717
  29. Toft, C.A.(1981) Feeding ecology of Panamanian litter anurans: Patterns in diet and foraging mode. Journal of Herpetology 15: 139-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/1563372
  30. Van Sluya, M. and C.F.D. Rocha(1998) Feeding habits and microhabitat utilization by two syntopic Brazilian Amazonian frogs(Hyla minuta and Pseudopaludicola sp.(gr. falcipes). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, Sao Carlos 58: 559-562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71081998000400003
  31. Van Sluys, M., G.M. Schittini, R.V. Marra, A.R.M. Azevedo, J.J. Vicente and D. Vrcibradic(2006) Body size, diet and endoparasites of the microhylid frog Chiasmoclies capixaba in an Atlantic forest area of southern Bahia state, Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 66(1A): 167-173.
  32. Wells, K.D.(1977) The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim. Behav. 25: 666-693.
  33. Yoon, I.B., J.I. Kim and S.Y. Yang(1998) Study on the food habits of Rana nigromaculata Hallowell and Rana plancyi Okada(Salientia; Ranidae) in Korea.. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 16(2): 69-76. (in Korean with English abstract)