Habitat Selection and Management of the Leopard Cat(Prionailurus bengalensis) in a Rural Area of Korea

농촌지역 삵(Prionailurus bengalensis)의 서식지 선택과 관리방안

  • Choi, Tae-Young (Ecosystem Assessment Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuk-Soo (Ecosystem Assessment Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Woo, Dong-Gul (Ecosystem Assessment Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Chong-Hwa (The Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 최태영 (국립환경과학원 자연평가연구팀) ;
  • 권혁수 (국립환경과학원 자연평가연구팀) ;
  • 우동걸 (국립환경과학원 자연평가연구팀) ;
  • 박종화 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2012.03.07
  • Accepted : 2012.05.03
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

The objectives of this paper were to investigate home range, habitat selection, and threat factors of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) living in rural area of Korea. The results based on radio tracking of three leopard cats (two males and one female) can be summarized as follows. First, the average home range of leopard cats were $2.64{\pm}1.99km^2$ (Kernel 95) and $3.69{\pm}1.34km^2$ (MCP 100), and the average size of core areas was $0.64{\pm}0.47km^2$ (Kernel 50). The home range of a male leopard cat that radio-tracked in winter was the largest ($5.19km^2$, MCP 100). Second, the Johnson's habitat selection model based on the Jacobs index showed that leopard cats preferred meadows and paddy fields avoiding forest covers at the second level, whereas they preferred meadows adjacent to streams and avoided paddy fields at the third level. Finally, roadkill could be prime threat factor for the cat population. Therefore, habitats dominated by paddy fields, stream corridors with paved roads, and human settlements with insufficient forest patches could threaten the long-term viability of leopard cat populations. Thus the habitat managements for the leopard cat conservation should focus on the prevention of road-kill and the installation of wildlife passages in rural highways adjacent to stream corridors.

본 연구는 원격무선추적 자료를 바탕으로 우리나라의 농촌지역에 서식하는 삵의 행동권, 서식지 선택, 개체군 위협요인을 파악하고자 하였으며 3개체(수컷 2, 암컷 1)를 대상으로 한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 행동권은 평균 $2.64{\pm}1.99km^2$(K 95)와 $3.69{\pm}1.34km^2$(MCP 100)이었으며, 핵심공간은 평균 $0.64{\pm}0.47km^2$(K 50)를 나타냈고, 겨울철에 추적된 수컷의 행동권이 가장 넓었다($5.19km^2$, MCP 100). 둘째, Jacobs index에 기반을 둔 Johnson의 서식지 선택모형을 분석한 결과 삵은 2단계 선택(경관 내에서의 서식지 선택)에서 초지와 논을 선호하고 산림은 회피하는 반면에, 3단계 선택(행동권 내에서의 서식지 선택)에서는 하천변의 초지를 매우 선호하고 논을 회피하였다. 셋째, 로드킬은 삵의 심각한 개체군 위협요인으로 판단되며, 논의 토지피복 비율이 높고, 하천변에 도로가 존재하며, 산림이 마을 주위에만 소규모로 존재하는 지역에서는 삵의 개체군 유지가 매우 불안정할 수 있어 이러한 지역에 로드킬 대책과 하천변 초지보호 등의 노력이 보다 집중되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aebischer, N.J., P.A. Robertson and R.E. Kenward(1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313-1325. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940062
  2. Aldridge, H.D.J.N. and R.M. Brigham(1988) Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% "rule" of radio-telemetry. J. Mammal. 69: 379-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381393
  3. Austin, S.C.(2002) Ecology of sympatric carnivores in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Ph. D. thesis, Texas A&M University-Kingsville and Texas A&M University, College Station, U.S.A.
  4. Chamberlain, M. and B. Leopold(2000) Spatial use patterns, seasonal habitat selection, and interactions among adult gray foxes in Mississippi. J. Wildlife Manage. 64: 742-751. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802744
  5. Chamberlain, M., B. Leopold and L. Conner(2002) Space use, movement and habitat selection of adult bobcats(Lynx rufus) in Central Mississippi. Am. Midl. Nat. 149: 395-405.
  6. Choi, T.Y. and C.H. Park(2006) The effects of land use on the frequency of mammal roadkills in Korea. J. Kor. land. Arc. 34: 52-58. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Choi, T.Y. and H.M. Choi(2007) Wildlife tracks and signs of Korea. Dolbegae, Seoul, 303pp. (in Korean)
  8. Choi, T.Y.(2007) Road-Kill Mitigation Strategies for Mammals in Korea: Data Based on Surveys of Road-kill, Non-wildlife Passage Use, and home-range. Ph. D. thesis. Seoul National Univ. Seoul, Korea, 219pp. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. Downs, J.A. and M.W. Horner(2008) Effects of point pattern shape on home range estimates. J. Wildlife Manage. 72: 1,813-1,818. https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-454
  10. Fortin, M. and M. Dale(2005) Spatial analysis ; a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 365pp.
  11. Grassman Jr, L.I.(2000) Movements and prey selection of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a dry evergreen forest in Thailand. Acta Theriol. 45: 421-426.
  12. Grassman Jr, L.I., M.E. Tewes, N.J. Silvy and K. Kreetiyutanont(2005) Spatial organization and diet of the leop ard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in north-central Thailand. J. Zool. 266: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095283690500659X
  13. Haase, P.(2001) Can isotropy vs. anisotropy in the spatial association of plant species resolve physical vs. biotic facilitation? J. Veg. Sci. 12: 127-136.
  14. Hutto, R.L.(1985) Habitat selection by nonbreeding migratory land birds. p. 455-476 In: M.L. Cody (ed.). Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando.
  15. Izawa, M., D. Oh, T. Miyakuni, S. Moteki, T. Hiyama and T. Doi(2006) The forest habitat for and endngered felid, the Tsushima leopard cat living in Tsushima island, Japan. A report to the Ministry of environment Japan. (in Japanese)
  16. Izawa, M., T. Doi and Y. Ono(1991) Ecological study on the two species of Felidae in Japan. In Wildlife conservation: present trends and perspectives for the 21st century: 141-144.
  17. Maruyama, N. (Eds). Yokohama: Japan Wildlife Research Centre. Izawa, M., T. Doi, N. Nakanishi and A. Teranishi(2009) Ecology and conservation of two endangered subspecies of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) on Japanese islands. Biol. Conserv. 142: 1,884-1,890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.005
  18. Jacobs, J.(1974) Quantitative measurements of food selection. Oecologia, 14: 413-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384581
  19. Jang, W.S., P.S. Park, A.R. Han, K.Y. Kim, M.P. Kim and H.K. Park(2010) The Spatial Distribution of Quercus mongolica and Its Association with Other Tree Species in Two Quercus mongolica Stands in Mt.Jiri, Korea. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 33(1): 67-77. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2010.33.1.067
  20. Johnson, D.H.(1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937156
  21. Kauhala, K. and M. Auttila(2010) Estimating habitat selection of badgers - a test between different methods. Folia Zoologica 59: 16-25.
  22. Laver, P.N. and M.J. Kelly(2008) A critical review of home range studies. J. Wildlife Manage. 72: 290-298. https://doi.org/10.2193/2005-589
  23. Lee, B.H., C.M. Won, Y.S. Cho and S.H. Han(2008) Taxonomy and Status and Geographic Variations of Prionailurus bengalensis in Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources research report. (in Korean)
  24. Lee, D.K. and W.K. Song(2008) A study on the analytic unit of habitat suitability assessment and selection in conservation area for Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis)-Focus on Chungcheong Province Area. J. Kor. Land. Arch. 130: 64-72. (in Korean)
  25. Lee, O.(2008) Study on the prey ha bit and habitat preference of the Leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis). Master Thesis, Chonnam National Univ. Kwangju, Korea, 53pp. (in Korean with English summary)
  26. Mech, L.D. and S.M. Barber(2002) A critique of wildlife radio-tracking and its use in national parks. A report to the U.S. National Park Service, pp. 19-20.
  27. MLTM(2010) Yearbook of road statistics. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs Report, Seoul, Korea, 1659pp. (in Korean)
  28. Mohr, C.O.(1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am. Midl. Nat. 37: 223-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2421652
  29. Oh, D., S. Moteki, T. Hiyama, A. Ueno, K. Mackawa and M. Izawa(2005) Seasonal and local variation of home range size of the leopard cat in Tsushima islands. Proceeding of 9th International Mammalogical Congress, pp. 382-383.
  30. Rabinowitz, A.(1990) Notes on the Behavior and Movements of Leopard Cats, Felis bengalensis, in a Dry Tropical Forest Mosaic in Thailand. Biotropica 22(4): 397-403. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388557
  31. Rajaratnam, R.(2000) Ecology of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Tabin Wildlife Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia. PhD thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.
  32. Rajaratnam, R., M. Sunquist, L. Rajaratnam and L. Ambu(2007) Diet and habitat selection of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis borneoensis) in an agricultural landscape in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. J. Trop. Ecol. 23: 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467406003841
  33. Rho, P.(2009) Use of GIS to Develop a Multivariate Habitat Model for the Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Mountainous Region of Korea. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 32(4): 229-236. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2009.32.4.229
  34. Sanderson, J., S. Sunarto, A. Wilting, C. Driscoll, R. Lorica, J. Ross, A. Hearn, S. Mujkherjee, J.A. Khan, B. Habib and L. Grassman(2008) Prionailurus bengalensis. In: IUCN(2011) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 10 April 2012.
  35. Schmidt, K., N. Nakanishi, M. Okamura, T. Doi and M. Izawa(2003) Movements and use of home range in the Iriomote cat (Prionailurus bengalensis irimotensis). J. Zool. 261: 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903004205
  36. Seaman, D.E. and R.A. Powell(1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77: 2,075-2,085. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265701
  37. Seaman, D.E., J.J. Millspaugh, B.J. Kernohan, G.C. Brundige, K.J. Raedeke and R.A. Gitzen(1999). Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J. Wildlife Manage. 63: 739-747. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802664
  38. Turner, M.G., R.H. Gardner and R.V. O'Neill(2001) Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice:Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, 416pp.
  39. Woo, D.G.(2010) Wildlife Habitat Conservation Plan of Leopard cats and Raccoon dogs in Gang-Seo Ecological Park, Seoul, Korea. Seoul National Univ. Master's Thesis, 113pp. (in Korean with English summary)
  40. Woon, M.H., S.H. Han, H.S. Oh and J.G. Kim(2004) The Mammals of Korea. Dongbang media, Seoul, 274pp. (In Korean)
  41. Worton, B.J.(1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164-168. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938423
  42. Worton, B.J.(1995) Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel- based home range estimators. J. Wildlife Manage. 59: 794-800. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801959