Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management

Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management (한국건설관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Upward Influence to Overcome Hierarchical Authority Expectations: A New Approach for Stakeholder Management

  • Received : 2011.12.22
  • Accepted : 2012.03.08
  • Published : 2012.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Critical to project success is effective stakeholder management. This paper presents a challenge for the project manager who uses traditional approaches to manage mid-level stakeholders in an organization. Dual roles of a mid-level stakeholder (as a stakeholder of a project and as an agent of the corporate) may cause problems that would result in difficulties for project managers in identifying the stakeholder's attributes and overcoming hierarchical authority expectation. However, the dual roles of the stakeholder result in its weakness in the project-stakeholder relationship. Can a project leverage its strategic role for effective upward influence by linking project objectives to corporate strategic objectives? To address this research question, case study method was used to gain a deeper understanding of mid-level stakeholder's salience. This research proposes an upward influence strategy to embed a project-stakeholder relationship in a hierarchical stakeholder network.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Aaltonen, K. Jaakko, O. Tuomas, "Stakeholder salience in global projects", International Journal of Project Management, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 509-516, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.004
  2. M. Boisot, J. Child, "From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: explaining China's emerging economic order", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 600-628, December 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393869
  3. L. Bourne, D. Walker, "Using a visualizing tool to study stakeholder influence-Two Australian examples", Project Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2006.
  4. G.D. Bruton, D. Ahlstrom, J.C. Wan, "Turnaround in East Asian firms: evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 519-540, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.312
  5. CCCPC, "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on major issues concerning the reform and development of state owned enterprises", Beijing, China. 1999.
  6. D.I. Cleland, "Stakeholder Management", in Project Management Handbook, Eds. Jeffrey K. Pinto, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
  7. B. Cova, R. Salle, "Six key points to merge project marketing into project management", International Journal of Project Manage, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 354-359, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.006
  8. T. Donaldson, "The Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications", Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85-91, 1995.
  9. Y. Doz, C.K. Prahalad, "Headquarters influence and strategic control in MNCs", Sloan Management Review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 15-29, 1981.
  10. W.G.Jr. Dyer, A.L. Wilkins, "Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt", The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 613-619, 1991.
  11. R.M. Emerson, "Power-dependence Relations", American Sociological Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31-41, 1962. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716
  12. K.M. Eisenhardt, "Agency theory: an assessment and review", Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57-74, 1989.
  13. S.M. Farmer, J.M. Maslyn, D.B. Fedor, J.D. Goodman, "Putting upward influence strategies in context", Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 17-42, January 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199701)18:1<17::AID-JOB785>3.0.CO;2-9
  14. R.E. Freeman, "The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions", Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409-421, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
  15. R.E. Freeman, W.M. Evan, "Corporate Governance: A stakeholder Interpretation", Journal of Behavioral Economics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 337-359, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90022-Y
  16. R. Friedman, S. Chi, L.A. Liu, "An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoiding", Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, pp. 76-91, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400172
  17. R.P. Gephart, "Qualitative research and the academy of management journal", Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 454-462, 2004. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2004.14438580
  18. K.R. Harrigan, "Joint ventures and competitive strategy", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 141-158, March 1988. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090205
  19. J. Heath, W. Norman, "Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era?", Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 247-265, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039418.75103.ed
  20. J.R. Hendry, "Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration", Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 79-99, September 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8502-6
  21. C. Hill, T. Jones, "Stakeholder-agency theory", Journal of Management Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131-154, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
  22. J. Hillman, G.D. Keim, "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line?", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 125-139, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H
  23. M.C. Jensen, W.H. Meckling, "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economic, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305-360, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  24. M. Jensen, "Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function", Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 32-42, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00259.x
  25. L. Jepsen, P. Eskerod, "Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world", International Journal of Project Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 335-343, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.002
  26. X. Lin, R. Germain, "Organizational structure, context, customer orientation, and performance: Lessons from Chinese state-owned enterprises", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1131-1151, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.348
  27. M. Lockett, "Culture and the problems of Chinese management", Organization Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 475-496, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900402
  28. M.A. Lyles, R.K. Reger, "Upward Influence in Joint Returns", Working paper, University of Illinois, 1987.
  29. M.A. Lyles, "Managing for autonomy in joint ventures: A longitudinal study of upward influence", Journal of Management Studies, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 383-404, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00310.x
  30. K. Masaaki, D. Dunlap-Hinkler, R. Parente, H.A. Mishra, "Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation", Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259-282, March 2007. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400261
  31. R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood, "Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts", Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 853-886, 1997.
  32. R.T. Mowday, "The exercise of upward influence in organizations", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 137-156, 1978. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392437
  33. N. Nohria, S. Ghoshal, "Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 491-502, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150606
  34. S.L. Payne, J.L. Calton, "Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-Stakeholder Learning Dialogues", Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 71-78, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1570-1
  35. J. Pfeffer, G. Salancik, "The external control of organizations; A resource dependence perspective", Harper & Row, 1978.
  36. J. Pfeffer, "Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems", Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 205-218, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90028-4
  37. Project Management Institute, "PMBOX", 4th ed., USA, 2008.
  38. J. Rost, R.L. Glass, "The impact of subversive stakeholders on software projects", Communication of ACM, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 135-138, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1145/1538788.1538819
  39. T.J. Rowley, "Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences", Academic Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 887-910, 1997.
  40. F.M. Santos, K.M. Eisenhardt, "Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields", Academy of Management Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 643-671, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669892
  41. W.K. Schilit, E.A. Locke, "A study of upward influence in organizations", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 2, 1982.
  42. S. Shrivastava, "Behavioral influence tactics as a function of objective and direction of influence", Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 151-169, 2007.
  43. L.M. Smith, "Stakeholder analysis: A Pivotal Practice of Successful Projects", Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, September 2000.
  44. G.M. Winch, S. Bonke, "Project stakeholder mapping: analyzing the interests of project stakeholders", in The frontiers of project management research, Eds. D.P. Slevin, D.I. Cleland, J.K. Pinto, Project Management Institute, pp. 385-403, 2002.
  45. G.M. Winch, "Managing project stakeholders", in The Wiley guide to managing projects, Eds. P.W.G. Morris, J.K. Pinto, New Jersey, Wiley, pp. 321-339, 2004.