DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anaerobic Digestion Treatment for the Mixture of Chinese Cabbage Waste Juice and Swine Manure

  • Kafle, Gopi Krishna (Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Hun (Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Shin, Beom-Soo (Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2011.12.14
  • Accepted : 2012.02.29
  • Published : 2012.02.25

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste juice (CCWJ) and swine manure(SM). Methods: The anaerobic digestion test was conducted under batch and continuous conditions at mesophilic temperature ($36-38^{\circ}C$). The batch test was divided into Experiment I and II. In the Experiment I, biogas potential and production rate of CCWJ was evaluated. In Experiment II the effect of F/M ratio (2.0, 3.2, 4.9) at mixture ratio of 25:75(CCWJ: SM, % vol. basis) on biogas yield was studied. Results: CCWJ produced biogas and methane yield of 929 and 700 mL/g VS added respectively. The biogas yield from the mixture of CCWJ and SM was almost same at F/M ratio of 2.0 and 3.2 but dropped by 14% when F/M ratio increased from 3.2 to 4.9. In continuous test the mixture of CCWJ and SM (25:75, % vol. basis) produced biogas yield of 352 mL/g VS added which is around 11% higher compared to biogas yield from SM alone. Addition to biogas yield digester performance was also improved with co-digestion of CCWJ with SM. Conclusions: The results showed that the anaerobic digestion of CCWJ with SM could be promising for improving both the biogas yield and digester performance at mesophilic temperature.

Keywords

References

  1. APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
  2. De Boer, F. and H. Bickel. 1988. Livestock feed resources and feed evaluation in Europe. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier science publishing company.
  3. Demirel, B. and P. Scherer. 2008. Production of methane from sugarbeet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass and Bioenergy 32:203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.09.011
  4. Hashimoto, A.G. 1983. Thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of swine manure. Agricultural wastes 6:175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(83)90085-9
  5. Hills, D.J. and D.W. Roberts. 1981. Anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and field crop residues. Agricultural Wastes 3:179-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(81)90026-3
  6. Kafle, G.K. and S.H. Kim. 2011. Sludge exchange process on two serial CSTRs anaerobic digestions: Process failure and recovery. Bioresource Technology 102: 6815-6822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.013
  7. Kaparaju, P. and Rintala, J. 2005. Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43: 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.001
  8. Kim, S.H. and B.S. Shin. 2009. Treatment of vegetable waste. Journal of Agricultural and Life Sciences (Agricultural and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University) 20:17-24.
  9. Kim, S.H. and G.K. Kafle. 2010. Effective treatment of swine manure with Chinese cabbage silage through two serial anaerobic digestion. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(1):53-62. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2010.35.1.053
  10. Kim, S.H. and R.H. Zhang. 2003. Biological treatment of kitchen food waste with sequencing batch reactors. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering 4(1):28-34.
  11. Koch, K., M. Wichern, M. Lübken and H. Horn. 2009. Mono fermentation of grass silage by means of loop reactors. Bioresource Technology 100:5934-5940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.020
  12. Korea Ministry of Environment (KME). 2005. The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005. Seoul, Korea: KME.
  13. Li, Y., Yan, X.L., Fan, J.P. and Zhu, J.H. 2011. Feasibility of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of herbalextraction residues with swine manure. Bioresource Technology 102(11):6458-6463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.093
  14. Liu, G., R. Zhang, H.M. EI-Mashad and R. Dong. 2009. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresource Technology 100:5103-5108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.081
  15. Lossie, U. and P. Putz. 2008. Targeted control of biogas plants with the help of FOS/TAC. Practice Report Hach-Lange. Available at: http://www.nl.hach- lange.be.
  16. Mshandete, A., A. Kivaisi, M. Rubindamayugi, B. Mattiasson. 2004. Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresource Technology 95(1):19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.01.011
  17. National Research Council (NRC). 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 6th revised ed. Washington, DC: National Academic Science.
  18. Nordmann, W., 1977. Die Uberwachung von Schlammfaulung, KA-Informationenfur das Betriebspersonal. BeilagezurKorrespondenzAbwasser 3 (77).
  19. Parawira, W., M. Murto, R. Zvauya and B. Mattiasson. 2004. Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renewable Energy 29:1811-1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.005
  20. Rieger, C. and P. Weiland. 2006. Early detection of process disturbance (Prozessstorungen fruhzeitig erkennen). Biogas Journal 4/06 Available at: www.biogas-infoboard. de/.../Seiten18-20%20aus%204-2006_komplett.pdf.
  21. Shin, J.D., S.S. Han, K.C. Eom, S. Sung, S.W. Park and H. Kim. 2008. Predicting methane production potential of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and food waste. Environmental Engineering Research 13(2): 93-97. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2008.13.2.093
  22. West, J. W., G. M. Hill and P. R. Utley. 1993. Peanut skin as a feed ingredient for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76:590-599. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77379-8

Cited by

  1. Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and FOG with sewage sludge – realising its potential in Ireland 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1380335
  2. Effect of Oil Content on Biogas Production, Process Performance and Stability of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0179-4
  3. Kinetic Study of the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure at Mesophilic Temperature: A Lab Scale Batch Operation vol.37, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.4.233
  4. Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation vol.103, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018
  5. Emissions of Odor, Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Volatile Organic Compounds from Shallow-Pit Pig Nursery Rooms vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.2.076
  6. Effect of Volatile Fatty Acid Concentration on Anaerobic Degradation Rate from Field Anaerobic Digestion Facilities Treating Food Waste Leachate in South Korea vol.2015, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/640717
  7. Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: A lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics vol.127, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.032
  8. Evaluation of the Biogas Productivity Potential of Fish Waste: A Lab Scale Batch Study vol.37, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.5.302
  9. Effects of chemical compositions and ensiling on the biogas productivity and degradation rates of agricultural and food processing by-products vol.142, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.018
  10. Batch anaerobic co-digestion of Kimchi factory waste silage and swine manure under mesophilic conditions vol.124, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.066
  11. High-solids anaerobic mono-digestion of riverbank grass under thermophilic conditions vol.52, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.005
  12. Methane Production Potential of Food Waste and Food Waste Mixture with Swine Manure in Anaerobic Digestion vol.37, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.2.100