Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.1.058

Anaerobic Digestion Treatment for the Mixture of Chinese Cabbage Waste Juice and Swine Manure  

Kafle, Gopi Krishna (Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Sang-Hun (Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University)
Shin, Beom-Soo (Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.37, no.1, 2012 , pp. 58-64 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste juice (CCWJ) and swine manure(SM). Methods: The anaerobic digestion test was conducted under batch and continuous conditions at mesophilic temperature ($36-38^{\circ}C$). The batch test was divided into Experiment I and II. In the Experiment I, biogas potential and production rate of CCWJ was evaluated. In Experiment II the effect of F/M ratio (2.0, 3.2, 4.9) at mixture ratio of 25:75(CCWJ: SM, % vol. basis) on biogas yield was studied. Results: CCWJ produced biogas and methane yield of 929 and 700 mL/g VS added respectively. The biogas yield from the mixture of CCWJ and SM was almost same at F/M ratio of 2.0 and 3.2 but dropped by 14% when F/M ratio increased from 3.2 to 4.9. In continuous test the mixture of CCWJ and SM (25:75, % vol. basis) produced biogas yield of 352 mL/g VS added which is around 11% higher compared to biogas yield from SM alone. Addition to biogas yield digester performance was also improved with co-digestion of CCWJ with SM. Conclusions: The results showed that the anaerobic digestion of CCWJ with SM could be promising for improving both the biogas yield and digester performance at mesophilic temperature.
Keywords
Batch test; Biogas; Chinese cabbage waste juice; Continuous test; Swine manure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shin, J.D., S.S. Han, K.C. Eom, S. Sung, S.W. Park and H. Kim. 2008. Predicting methane production potential of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and food waste. Environmental Engineering Research 13(2): 93-97.   DOI
2 West, J. W., G. M. Hill and P. R. Utley. 1993. Peanut skin as a feed ingredient for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76:590-599.   DOI
3 Kim, S.H. and G.K. Kafle. 2010. Effective treatment of swine manure with Chinese cabbage silage through two serial anaerobic digestion. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(1):53-62.   DOI
4 Kim, S.H. and R.H. Zhang. 2003. Biological treatment of kitchen food waste with sequencing batch reactors. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering 4(1):28-34.
5 Koch, K., M. Wichern, M. Lübken and H. Horn. 2009. Mono fermentation of grass silage by means of loop reactors. Bioresource Technology 100:5934-5940.   DOI
6 Korea Ministry of Environment (KME). 2005. The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005. Seoul, Korea: KME.
7 Li, Y., Yan, X.L., Fan, J.P. and Zhu, J.H. 2011. Feasibility of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of herbalextraction residues with swine manure. Bioresource Technology 102(11):6458-6463.   DOI
8 Liu, G., R. Zhang, H.M. EI-Mashad and R. Dong. 2009. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresource Technology 100:5103-5108.   DOI
9 Lossie, U. and P. Putz. 2008. Targeted control of biogas plants with the help of FOS/TAC. Practice Report Hach-Lange. Available at: http://www.nl.hach- lange.be.
10 Mshandete, A., A. Kivaisi, M. Rubindamayugi, B. Mattiasson. 2004. Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresource Technology 95(1):19-24.   DOI
11 National Research Council (NRC). 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 6th revised ed. Washington, DC: National Academic Science.
12 Nordmann, W., 1977. Die Uberwachung von Schlammfaulung, KA-Informationenfur das Betriebspersonal. BeilagezurKorrespondenzAbwasser 3 (77).
13 Hashimoto, A.G. 1983. Thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of swine manure. Agricultural wastes 6:175-191.   DOI
14 Rieger, C. and P. Weiland. 2006. Early detection of process disturbance (Prozessstorungen fruhzeitig erkennen). Biogas Journal 4/06 Available at: www.biogas-infoboard. de/.../Seiten18-20%20aus%204-2006_komplett.pdf.
15 Parawira, W., M. Murto, R. Zvauya and B. Mattiasson. 2004. Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renewable Energy 29:1811-1823.   DOI
16 APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
17 De Boer, F. and H. Bickel. 1988. Livestock feed resources and feed evaluation in Europe. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier science publishing company.
18 Demirel, B. and P. Scherer. 2008. Production of methane from sugarbeet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass and Bioenergy 32:203-209.   DOI
19 Hills, D.J. and D.W. Roberts. 1981. Anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and field crop residues. Agricultural Wastes 3:179-89.   DOI
20 Kafle, G.K. and S.H. Kim. 2011. Sludge exchange process on two serial CSTRs anaerobic digestions: Process failure and recovery. Bioresource Technology 102: 6815-6822.   DOI
21 Kim, S.H. and B.S. Shin. 2009. Treatment of vegetable waste. Journal of Agricultural and Life Sciences (Agricultural and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University) 20:17-24.
22 Kaparaju, P. and Rintala, J. 2005. Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43: 175-188.   DOI