IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment Model of Core Manufacturability to Promote Collaboration of Small and Medium Sized Mold Companies

중소 금형업체 협업지원을 위한 핵심 제조역량 평가 모델 개발

  • Shin, Moon-Soo (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Lee, San-Gil (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ryu, Kwang-Yeo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Joo, Jae-Koo (Department of Systems and Management Engineering, Inje University)
  • 신문수 (한밭대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 이상일 (부산대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 류광열 (부산대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 주재구 (인제대학교 시스템경영공학과)
  • Received : 2011.12.12
  • Accepted : 2012.02.06
  • Published : 2012.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Up-to-date enlargement of the scale of global outsourcing has brought about the need of systematic and efficient tools for competitive supplier discovery located in various areas. A web-based business supporting system, referred to as Excellent Manufacturer Scouting System(EMSS), is being developed to serve core business functions including supplier discovery, negotiation, and collaboration between overseas buyers and domestic suppliers throughout the process of supply chain formation. In this paper, a supplier assessment model devoted to evaluation of core manufacturing capability is proposed by targeting small and medium sized mold companies. The assessment model will eventually be loaded to EMSS. Even if many well-designed models for supplier assessment have been presented in literature, most of them limit the evaluation criteria to somewhat general information on a given supplier, such as cost, delivery time, quality, rather than core manufacturing capability itself. This research is pioneering work on supplier assessment from the viewpoint of manufacturability. The proposed assessment model classifies assessment indices into six criteria, which have been drawn by intensive survey and analysis of the mold industry. Actual assessment indices for each criterion are also presented along with an exemplary evaluation result.

Keywords

References

  1. Buffa, F. P. and Jackson, W. M. (1983), A goal programming model for purchase planning, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(3), 27-34.
  2. Chan, F. T. S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C. W., and Choy, K. L. (2008), Global supplier selection : a fuzzy-AHP approach, International Journal of the Production Research, 46(14), 3825-3857. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600787200
  3. Choy, K. L. and Lee, W. B. (2002), On the development of a case based supplier management tool for multinational manufacturers, Measuring Business Excellence, 6(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040210420501
  4. De Boer, L., Labro, E., and Morlacchi, P. (2001), A review of methods supporting supplier selection, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9
  5. Dickson, G. W. (1966), An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions, Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.
  6. Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Wallenius, J., and Zionts, S. (1992), Multiple criteria decision making, multi attribute utility theory : the next ten years, Management Science, 38(5), 645-654. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.5.645
  7. Feng, C. X., Wang, J., and Wang, J. S. (2001), An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers, International Journal of the Computers and Industrial Engineering, 40, 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(00)00047-4
  8. Ghodsypour, S. H. and O'Brien, C. (1998), A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, International Journal of the Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00009-1
  9. Ghodsypour, S. H. and O'Brien, C. (2001), The total cost of logistics in supplier, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint, International Journal of the Production Economics, 73, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00093-7
  10. Gregory, R. E. (1986), Source selection : a matrix approach, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22(2), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1986.tb00159.x
  11. Khorramshahgol, R., Azani, H., and Gousty, Y. (1988), An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35(4), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.7449
  12. Kim, D. Y. and Wagner, S. M. (2011), Supplier selection problem revisited from the perspective of product configuration, International Journal of Production Research, Available online
  13. Korea Trade Commission (2008), Survey of the competitiveness of mold industry (Annual report).
  14. Liu, J., Ding, F-Y., and Lall, V. (2000), Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement, Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 5(3), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540010338893
  15. Liu, F. H. F. and Hai, H. L. (2005), The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005
  16. MacQueen, J. B. (1967), Some methods for classification and analysis of multi- variate observations, Proceedings of 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, 281-297.
  17. Min, H. (1993), International supplier selection : a multi-attribute utility approach, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(5), 24-33.
  18. Narasimhan, R. (1983), An analytical approach to supplier selection, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(4), 27-32.
  19. NIST (2010), Make it in America supplier scouting, http://www.nist.gov/mep/scouting.cfm.
  20. NIST (2011), Baldrige performance excellence program, http://www.nist.gov/ baldrige/.
  21. Nydick, R. L. and Hill, R. P. (1992), Using the analytical hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), 31-36.
  22. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
  23. Sharma, D., Benton, W. C., and Srivastava, R. (1989), Competitive strategy and purchasing decisions, Proceedings of the Annual National Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, 1088-1090.
  24. Soukup, W. R. (1987), Supplier selection strategies, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 23(2), 7-12.
  25. Thompson, K. N. (1990), Supplier profile analysis, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1990.tb00494.x
  26. Timmerman, E. (1987), An approach to vendor performance evaluation, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 15(3), 14-20.
  27. Wang, G., Huang, S. H., and Dismukes, J. P. (2004), Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology, International Journal of Production Economics, 91, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00221-4
  28. Weber, C. A. and Ellram, L. M. (1993), Supplier selection using multi-objective programming : a decision support system approach, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23(2), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039310038161
  29. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Benton, W. C. (1991), Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operation Research, 50(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
  30. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Benton, W. C. (1993), A multi-objective approach to vendor selection, European Journal of Operation Research, 68, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90301-3
  31. Wu, T. and Blackhurst, J. (2009), Supplier evaluation and selection : an augmented DEA approach, International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4593-4608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802054227