Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7232/IEIF.2012.25.1.052

Assessment Model of Core Manufacturability to Promote Collaboration of Small and Medium Sized Mold Companies  

Shin, Moon-Soo (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University)
Lee, San-Gil (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
Ryu, Kwang-Yeo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
Joo, Jae-Koo (Department of Systems and Management Engineering, Inje University)
Publication Information
IE interfaces / v.25, no.1, 2012 , pp. 52-63 More about this Journal
Abstract
Up-to-date enlargement of the scale of global outsourcing has brought about the need of systematic and efficient tools for competitive supplier discovery located in various areas. A web-based business supporting system, referred to as Excellent Manufacturer Scouting System(EMSS), is being developed to serve core business functions including supplier discovery, negotiation, and collaboration between overseas buyers and domestic suppliers throughout the process of supply chain formation. In this paper, a supplier assessment model devoted to evaluation of core manufacturing capability is proposed by targeting small and medium sized mold companies. The assessment model will eventually be loaded to EMSS. Even if many well-designed models for supplier assessment have been presented in literature, most of them limit the evaluation criteria to somewhat general information on a given supplier, such as cost, delivery time, quality, rather than core manufacturing capability itself. This research is pioneering work on supplier assessment from the viewpoint of manufacturability. The proposed assessment model classifies assessment indices into six criteria, which have been drawn by intensive survey and analysis of the mold industry. Actual assessment indices for each criterion are also presented along with an exemplary evaluation result.
Keywords
supplier discovery; excellent manufacturer scouting system(EMSS); core manufacturability assessment; mold industry;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Buffa, F. P. and Jackson, W. M. (1983), A goal programming model for purchase planning, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(3), 27-34.
2 Chan, F. T. S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C. W., and Choy, K. L. (2008), Global supplier selection : a fuzzy-AHP approach, International Journal of the Production Research, 46(14), 3825-3857.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Choy, K. L. and Lee, W. B. (2002), On the development of a case based supplier management tool for multinational manufacturers, Measuring Business Excellence, 6(1), 15-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 De Boer, L., Labro, E., and Morlacchi, P. (2001), A review of methods supporting supplier selection, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(2), 75-89.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Dickson, G. W. (1966), An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions, Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.
6 Liu, F. H. F. and Hai, H. L. (2005), The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 308-317.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 MacQueen, J. B. (1967), Some methods for classification and analysis of multi- variate observations, Proceedings of 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, 281-297.
8 Min, H. (1993), International supplier selection : a multi-attribute utility approach, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(5), 24-33.
9 Narasimhan, R. (1983), An analytical approach to supplier selection, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(4), 27-32.
10 NIST (2010), Make it in America supplier scouting, http://www.nist.gov/mep/scouting.cfm.
11 NIST (2011), Baldrige performance excellence program, http://www.nist.gov/ baldrige/.
12 Nydick, R. L. and Hill, R. P. (1992), Using the analytical hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), 31-36.
13 Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
14 Sharma, D., Benton, W. C., and Srivastava, R. (1989), Competitive strategy and purchasing decisions, Proceedings of the Annual National Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, 1088-1090.
15 Soukup, W. R. (1987), Supplier selection strategies, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 23(2), 7-12.
16 Thompson, K. N. (1990), Supplier profile analysis, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(1), 11-18.   DOI
17 Ghodsypour, S. H. and O'Brien, C. (2001), The total cost of logistics in supplier, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint, International Journal of the Production Economics, 73, 15-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Wallenius, J., and Zionts, S. (1992), Multiple criteria decision making, multi attribute utility theory : the next ten years, Management Science, 38(5), 645-654.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Feng, C. X., Wang, J., and Wang, J. S. (2001), An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers, International Journal of the Computers and Industrial Engineering, 40, 15-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ghodsypour, S. H. and O'Brien, C. (1998), A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, International Journal of the Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212.   DOI
21 Gregory, R. E. (1986), Source selection : a matrix approach, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22(2), 24-29.   DOI
22 Khorramshahgol, R., Azani, H., and Gousty, Y. (1988), An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35(4), 265-270.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Kim, D. Y. and Wagner, S. M. (2011), Supplier selection problem revisited from the perspective of product configuration, International Journal of Production Research, Available online
24 Korea Trade Commission (2008), Survey of the competitiveness of mold industry (Annual report).
25 Liu, J., Ding, F-Y., and Lall, V. (2000), Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement, Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 5(3), 143-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Benton, W. C. (1991), Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operation Research, 50(1), 2-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Timmerman, E. (1987), An approach to vendor performance evaluation, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 15(3), 14-20.
28 Wang, G., Huang, S. H., and Dismukes, J. P. (2004), Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology, International Journal of Production Economics, 91, 1-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Weber, C. A. and Ellram, L. M. (1993), Supplier selection using multi-objective programming : a decision support system approach, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23(2), 3-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Benton, W. C. (1993), A multi-objective approach to vendor selection, European Journal of Operation Research, 68, 173-184.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Wu, T. and Blackhurst, J. (2009), Supplier evaluation and selection : an augmented DEA approach, International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4593-4608.   DOI   ScienceOn