참고문헌
- 곽경화, 남정희 (2009). 과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), 400-413.
- 남정희, 곽경화, 장경화, Brian Hand (2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936.
- 조혜숙 (2009). 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동이 학생들의 글쓰기에서 나타난 다중 표상과 내재성에 미치는 영향. 부산대학교 석사학위 논문.
- 이동원 (2011). 논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 학 생들의 글쓰기에서 나타난 다중 표상과 내재성에 미치는 영향. 부산대학교 석사학위 논문.
- Applebee, A.N. (1984a). Writing and reasoning. Review of Education Research, 54, 577-596. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054004577
- Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-818. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 3, 287-312.
- Duschl. R., & Osborne. J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Duschl, R., & Ellenbogen, K. (2002). Argumentation processes in science learning. Paper presented at the Conference on Philosophical, Psychological, and Linguistic Foundation For Language and Science Literacy Research, University of Victory, B.C., Canada.
- Flower, L. (1998). Problem-solving strategies for writing. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Inc,. N. Y.
- Greenwald, E. A., Persky, H. R., Campbell, J. R., & Mazzeo, J. (1990). NAEP 1999 Writing Report Card for the national and the States. Education Statistics Quarterly, 1(4), 23-28.
- Hand, B., Choi, A., Greenbowe, T., Schroeder, J., & Bennett, W.(2008). Examining the Impact of Student Use of Multiple-mode Representations in Constructing Science Arguments. Annual International Conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
- Katherine L. McNeill. (2008). Lynch school of education. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
- Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography student's use of evidence in writing. Science Education,86, 314-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
- Kelly, G. J., Bazerman, C., Skukauakaite, A., & Prothero, W.(2002). Rhetorical features of student science Writing in introductory Conference Ontological, Epistemological., Linguistics and Pedagogical Considerations of language and Science literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction, Victoria, BC, Canada.
- Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prian, V., Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065- 1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
- Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Kuhn. D. (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824.
- Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. (2005). Students constructing and defending evidence-based scientific explanations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
- Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, Learning, and values, NJ: Ablex.
- McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J, Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences.15(2), 153- 191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
- Newton, P., Driver, P., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
- Norris, S., & Philips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
- Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
- Osborne. J., (2002). Science without literacy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559
- Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 179-201.
- Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Roth, W. M., McGinn, M., Woszcyna, C., & Boutonne, S. (1999). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configurations, and physical arrangements. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 293-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1999.9672073
- Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students''scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2
- Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. (2005) The quality of student's use of evidence in written scientific explanation. Cognition and Istruction, 23(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Sampson, V. & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
피인용 문헌
- The Effects of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on the Middle School Students' Achievements vol.33, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.952
- Analysis of Student Science Writing and Perception on Argument-Based Claim and Evidence Writing Approach vol.34, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0787
- An Comparison Analysis of Science Writing Tasks in the Chemistry Domain of Middle School Science Textbooks Developed under the 2007 & the 2009 Revised National Curriculums (RNC) vol.58, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.6.600
- Investigating the Cognitive Process of a Student's Modeling on a Modeling-Emphasized Argument-Based General Chemistry Experiment vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0313
- Impact of Peer Assessment Activities on High School Student's Argumentation in Argument-Based Inquiry vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0353
- The Effects of the Argument-Based Claim and Evidence Writing Approach: Focus on High School Chemistry vol.59, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.1.69
- Pre-Service Chemistry Teacher's Designing and Implementing Inquiry-Based Science Instruction that Emphasizes Argumentation and Writing: Focus on Ways to Overcome Difficulties vol.60, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.342
- 집단지성을 활용한 예비교사들의 과학지식 형성과정 탐색 vol.33, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.963
- Application and Development of a Storytelling Teaching-learning Method Using the Science Writing Heuristic vol.17, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.3.709
- 논변, 논의 그리고 논증: 개념의 명료화를 위한 문헌조사 연구 vol.33, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1119
- 고등학교 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향 vol.36, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0347
- The status of scientific writing and its educational significance in school science vol.23, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2017.23.6.297
- 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(SWH)를 적용한 고등학교 과제연구의 효과 vol.62, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.5.398
- Analysis of Science Writing Activities in ‘Life Science I’ Textbooks according to the 2015 Revised Curriculum vol.46, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.4.556
- 초등학교 과학 교과용 도서에서 나타난 과학 글쓰기 과제 분석 : 2007, 2009, 2015 개정 교육과정을 중심으로 vol.12, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2019.12.3.261
- 논의기반 탐구 과학수업의 학급 논의 활동에서 나타나는 중학생들의 인식론적 사고의 특징 및 변화 vol.64, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.1.38
- 논의기반 탐구활동이 초등학생의 과학 글쓰기에 나타나는 주장과 증거에 미치는 영향 vol.64, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.6.389