Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Implant Preload on the Marginal Bone Stresses Studied by Three Dimensional Finite Element Aanalysis

임플란트 고정체와 지대주 간의 전하중 크기가 골응력에 미치는 영향에 대한 유한요소해석

  • Nam, Hyo-Jun (Department of Dentistry Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jo, Kwang-Hun (Department of Dentistry Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
  • 남효준 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조광헌 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2012.05.01
  • Accepted : 2012.06.25
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to assess the effect of preload level on the stress development at the marginal cortical bone surrounding implant neck. A finite element model was created for a single implant placed in the lower jaw bone. An external load of 100N was applied on the top of abutment at 30 degree with the implant axis in lingo-buccal direction. Five different preloads, i.e. 0, 200, 400, 600, 800N were applied to the abutment stem to investigate if and/or how the preload affects on the marginal bone stress. Differences in the marginal bone stress were recorded depending on the level of preload. On the other hand, the tensile stress on the marginal cortical bone decreased in models of higher preload. Preloads between abutment/fixture can increase compressive stresses in the marginal cortical bone although the amount may be insignificant as compared to those generated by functional forces.

본 연구에서는 임플란트 고정체와 지대주 간의 전하중 크기가 임플란트 주위 변연골의 응력분포에 미치는 영향에 대해 조사하였다. 해석 모델은 하악골에 식립되는 단일 임플란트(solid형 지대주와 submerged 형 고정체)로 제작되었고, 외력 조건으로는 임플란트 지대주 상부에 100N의 기능력이 협설 방향으로 30도 경사져 협측으로 작용하도록 설정하였다. 전하중의 크기가 변연골 응력 분포에 어떠한 차이가 생기게 하는지를 조사하기 위해 다섯개의 다른 전하중의 크기(0, 200, 400, 600, 800N)를 부여하였다. 모든 분석은 선형 탄성을 가정하여 ABAQUS/CAE(ver6.10-1, HKS, Fremont, CA, USA) 프로그램을 사용하였다. 임플란트 주위 변연골 응력분포의 차이는 전하중의 크기와 관련이 있었다. 100N의 교합력 하에 전하중이 0인 경우 변연골(임플란트 벽에서 0.1mm 떨어진 부분)에서 압축 응력은 28.33MPa이었는데, 전하중을 200N 증가시킬 때마다 1.76MPa씩 증가하였다. 이런 방식으로 800N의 전하중을 가할 때 나타나는 최대 압축 응력은 35.18MPa이었다. 반면 변연골에서의 인장 응력은 전하중이 증가할 수록 감소하였다. 임플란트 고정체와 지대주 간의 전하중은 변연골에서의 압축 응력을 증가시킬 수 있으나 기능력에 비하면 그 효과는 미미할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wang RF, Kang B, Lang LA, Razzoog ME. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Prosthet Dent 2009;101:359-71.
  2. Alkan I, Sertgöz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:319-25.
  3. Ricomini Filho AP, Fernandes FS, Straioto FG, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant-abutment connection systems. Braz Dent J 2010;21:123-9.
  4. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:119-30.
  5. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-6.
  6. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants: From prostheses treatment to first annual check up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-3.
  7. Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-66.
  8. Binon P, Franz, Brunski J, Gulbransen H. The role of screws in implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:48-63.
  9. Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:592-9.
  10. Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:353-9.
  11. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Comparison of "Look-Alike" implant prosthetic retaining screws. J Prosthodont 1995;4:23-7.
  12. Lang LA, Kang B, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:539-46.
  13. Stüker RA, Teixeira ER, Beck JC, da Costa NP. Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008:16:55-8.
  14. Kim KT. An evaluation of preload between abutment and fixture of dental implant using 3D finite element method. Ph D Thesis, Kyungpook National University, 2010.
  15. Lee BH, Chun HJ, Han CH, Lee SH. 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of implant screw loosening of different connection types. Proceedings of KSME 2005 Spring Annual Meeting 2005; 1023-8.
  16. Seo JW, Kang KT, Chun HJ, Han CH. Study of an analytical model for screw loosening mechanism of dental implants. Proceedings of KSME 2007 Spring Annual Meeting 2007;737-42.
  17. Im SM, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cha MS, Choi LR. Biomechanical considerations for the screw of implant prosthesis: A literature review. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:61-8.
  18. Eom TG, Suh SW, Jeon GR, Shin JW, Jeong CM. Effect of Tightening Torque on Abutment-Fixture Joint Stability using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47: 125-35.
  19. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, Wang hL. Effect of Microthreads and Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis. J Periodontol 2008;79:2166-72.
  20. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis - a twodimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 1998;24:80-8.
  21. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 1985; 37:411-7.
  22. Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-88.
  23. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 207-18.
  24. Frost HM. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003;275: 1081-101.
  25. Quirynen M, Bollen CML, Eyssen H, van Steenberghe D. Microvial penetration along the implant components of the Branemark system. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994:5;239-44.
  26. Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:24-32.
  27. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear finite element contact analysis of preload dental implant components. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implant 1993; 655-61.
  28. Brunski JB, Hipp JA. In vivo forces on endosteal implants: a measurement system and biomechanical considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:82-90.
  29. Sones AD. Complication with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:581-5.
  30. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:295-302.
  31. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:357-68.
  32. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A threedimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-94.
  33. Clelland NL, Gilat A. The effect of abutment angulation on stress transfer for an implant. J Prosthodont 1992;1:24-8.
  34. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21: 195-202.
  35. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997;23: 104-11.
  36. Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Nemoto K, Aida M. Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant. Dent Mater J 2005;24:219-24.