DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimum Milling Degree for Improving Sensory Quality of Cooked Rice

식미 증진을 위한 최적 도정도 구명

  • Received : 2012.08.30
  • Accepted : 2012.10.24
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

We conducted this study to identify the optimal milling degree for improving sensory quality of cooked rice and minimizing yield loss. The samples were analyzed for their physicochemical properties and sensory qualities using five different degree of milling(5.5~13.5%, based on brown rice). With increasing of milling degree, amylose content, breakdown, adhesiveness of cooked rice increased, whereas protein content, Mg/K equivalence ratio, fat content, setback and hardness of cooked rice decreased. In sensory quality test, the preference was significantly higher in the 9.5% and 11.5% milling degree. However, considering the yield of milled rice, the optimal milling degree for improving sensory quality of cooked rice was 9.5%.

본 연구는 도정도 5.5%(현백율 94.5%, 7분도)~13.5%(현백율 86.5%, 17분도)별 식미 및 이화학특성 변화를 분석하여 식미 증진을 위한 최적 도정도를 구명하고자 하였다. 이화학특성은 도정을 많이 할수록 백도와 아밀로스함량, 강하점도, 밥의 부착성은 증가하였으나, 반면 단백질함량, Mg/K 당량비, 지방함량, 취반점도, 밥의 경도는 유의하게 감소하였다. 식미관능평가에 의한 식미총평은 도정도 9.5%와 11.5%에서 통계적으로 유의하게 높았다. 그러나 현미를 도정하여 남는 쌀의 수율을 고려 할 때 식미총평이 좋은 최적 도정도는 9.5% 수준인 것으로 판단된다. 이는 이론적인 도정도 8%나 시중에서 유통되고 있는 쌀의 도정도 9% 보다 더 많이 도정한 것이다. 식미와 이화학특성과의 관계는 단백질함량, 아밀로스함량, 취반점도 및 밥의 경도는 부의 상관이, Mg/K 당량비, 강하점도, 밥의 부착성은 정의 상관이 있는 것으로 알려져 있다. 도정을 많이 할수록 식미와 부의 상관이 있는 단백질 함량은 감소하는 반면, 아밀로스함량은 증가 하는 등 이화학특성들 간에 상호작용이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 도정도 9.5%~11.5%에서 식미총평이 가장 좋았던 것은 이들 이화학특성들 간에 적정수준의 균형을 이루었기 때문으로 고찰된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi H. C. 2002. Current status and perspectives in varietal improvement of rice cultivars for high-quality and value-added products. Korean J. Crop Sci. 47(S) : 15-32.
  2. Chun A., D. J. Kim, M. R. Yoon, S. K. Oh, I. S. Choi, H. C. Hong, and Y. G. Kim. 2012. Effect of milling degree on the physicochemical and sensory quality of Sogokju. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 41(1) : 136-142. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2012.41.1.136
  3. Hoshikawa K. 1989. The growing rice plant : An anatomical monograph Noubunkyo Tokyo : 255-292.
  4. Juliano, B. O. 1971. A simplified assay for milled-rice amylose. Cereal Sci. Today. 16 : 334-336, 338, 360.
  5. Kim H. R., A. R. Lee, Y. H. Kwon, H. J. Lee, S. J. Jo, and B. H. Ahn. 2010. Physicochemical characteristics and volatile compounds of glutinous rice wines depending on the milling degrees. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 42 : 75-81.
  6. Kim S. R., J. Y. Ahn, H. Y. Lee, and T. Y. Ha. 2004. Various properties and phenolic acid contents of rices and rice brans with different milling fractions. Korean J. Food Sci. Technal. 36(6) : 930-936.
  7. Lee, S. M., H. B. Lee, J. S. Lee, 2006. Comparison of extraction methods for the determination of vitamin E in some grains. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 35(2) : 248-253. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.2.248
  8. Liang J, Z. Lia, K. Tsujic, K. Nakanoc, M. J. Robert Nout, and R. J. Hamer. 2008. Milling characteristics and distribution of phytic acid and zinc in long-medium and short-grain rice. Journal of Cereal Science 48 : 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2007.08.003
  9. Liu K., X. Cao, Q. Bai, H. Wen, and Z. Gu. 2009. Relationships between physical properties of brown rice and degree of milling and loss of selenium. Journal of Food Engineering 94 : 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.03.001
  10. Mohapatra D. and S. Bal. 2006. Cooking quality and instrumental textural attributes of cooked rice for different milling fractions. Journal of Food Engineering 73 : 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.028
  11. National Institute of Crop Science. 2003. Evaluate the quality and taste of rice. Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
  12. Park J. K., S. S. Kim, and K. O. Kim. 2001. Effect of milling ratio on sensory properties of cooked rice and on physicochemical properties of milled and cooked rice. Cereal Chem. 78 : 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.2.151
  13. Perdon, A. A., T. J. Siebenmorgen, A. Mauromoustakos, V. J. Griffin, and E. R. Johnson. 2001. Degree of milling effect on rice pasting properties. Cereal Chemistry. 78 : 205-209. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.2.205
  14. Slavin J, D. Jacobs, L., and Marquart. 1997. Whole-grain consumption and chronic disease. Prot. Mech. Nutr. Cancer 27 : 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635589709514495
  15. Tran, T. U., K. Suzuki, H. Okadome, S. Homma, and K. Ohtsubo. 2004. Analysis of the tastes of brown rice and milled rice with different milling yields using a taste sensing system. Food Chemistry 88 : 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.02.007
  16. Yadav B. K. and V. K. Jindal. 2008. Changes in head rice yield and whiteness during milling of rough rice(Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Food Engineering 86 : 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.09.025

Cited by

  1. Comparison of the Sensory Ability of Experts and Untrained Panelists to Evaluate Cooked Rince by using Five Sensory Methods vol.61, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2016.61.2.092
  2. Varietal Difference of Eating Quality on Different Milling Degree in Japonica Rice vol.59, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.1.047
  3. Palatability and Physicochemical Properties in 2001 Yield Increased by 10% than Normal Level in 2000 vol.58, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2013.58.3.292
  4. Effect of Degree of Milling on Physicochemical Properties of Rice Flour and Rice Noodles vol.45, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.12.1762
  5. A Scientific Approach to Increase the Consumption of Rice as Future Food Resources vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2017.33.6.713
  6. Variation on Appearance and Physicochemical Quality of Commercial Rice of Each Country vol.30, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2018.30.1.1
  7. Cup Arrangement Ranking Method for a Rapid and Small-Sample Sensory Evaluation of Cooked Rice vol.47, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9787/kjbs.2015.47.2.105
  8. 도정도를 달리한 쌀이 가속숙성에 의해 약주의 품질변화에 미치는 영향 vol.52, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2020.52.4.415