The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Marginal and internal fitness of three-unit zirconia cores fabricated using several CAD/CAM systems

다양한 CAD/CAM 시스템으로 제작된 3 본 고정성 가공의치 지르코니아 코어의 변연 및 내면 적합도 평가

  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, U-Sic (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ha-Young (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Eun (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Yeol (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Su (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
  • 허중보 (부산대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김우식 (고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 김하영 (고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 김종은 (고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 이정렬 (고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 김영수 (고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 전영찬 (부산대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신상완 (고려대학교 임상치의학연구소)
  • Received : 2011.06.10
  • Accepted : 2011.07.06
  • Published : 2011.07.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to compare the margin and internal fitness of 3-unit zirconia bridge cores fabricated by several CAD/CAM systems using replica technique. Materials and methods: Three unit-bridge models in which upper canine and upper second premolar were used as abutments and upper first premolar was missed, were fabricated. Fourty models were classified into 4 groups (Cerasys$^{(R)}$ (Group C), Dentaim$^{(R)}$ (Group D), KaVo Everest$^{(R)}$ (Group K), $Lava^{TM}$ (Group L)), and zirconia cores were fabricated by each company. Sixteen points were measured on each abutment by replica technique. Statistical analysis was accomplished with two way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 (${\alpha}$=.05). Results: In most systems, there was a larger gap on inter margin than outer margin. In the Group K, overall fitness was excellent, but the incisal gap was very large. In the Group C, marginal gap was significantly larger than Group K, but overall internal gap was uniform (P<.05). The axial gap was under $100\;{\mu}m$ in all system. The difference between internal and external gap was small on Group L and C. However, internal gap was significantly larger than external gap in Group D (P<.05). The fitness of canine was better than second premolar among abutments (P<.05). Conclusion: The marginal and internal gap was within the clinically allowed range in all of the three systems. There was a larger gap on second premolar than canine on internal and marginal surface. In most systems, there was a larger gap on occlusal surface than axial surface.

연구 목적: 본 연구는 다양한 CAD/CAM 시스템에 의해 제작된 지르코니아를 이용한 3-unit 브릿지 코어의 적합도를 "Replica Technique"으로 측정하여 기존 제품들의 내면 및 변연 적합도를 평가해 각 시스템의 적합 특성을 알아보고 임상 적용에 참고 자료로 활용하고자 시행하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 상악 좌측 제1소구치를 결손치로 하고 상악 좌측 견치, 상악 좌측 제2소구치를 지대치로 하는 3-unit 고정성 가공의치를 구현한 티타늄 모형을 제작하고, 40개의 실험 모형을 제작하였다. 각 모형을 10개씩 분류하고 Cerasys$^{(R)}$ (C군), Dentaim$^{(R)}$ (D군), KaVo Everest$^{(R)}$ (K군), $Lava^{TM}$ (L군)시스템으로 각각 지르코니아 코어를 제작하였다. 제작된 코어는 각 지대치마다 내면에 16개의 점을 선택하고 "Replica Technique"을 이용하여 각 포인트의 간극을 측정하였고 부위별 측정치를 비교, 평가하였다. Two-way ANOVA와 Dunnett T3 analysis를 이용하여 통계 분석하였다(${\alpha}$=.05). 결과: 모든 시스템에서 변연의 외부보다 내부에서 조금 더 큰 간극을 보이는 특징을 보였다. K군의 경우 전반적인 적합도는 우수하였으나 절단부위의 간극이 아주 크게 나타나는 특징을 보였고, C군의 경우 변연부위의 간극은 K군와 비교하여 크지만(P<.05) 전반적인 내면 간극이 다른 시스템에 비해 균일한 특징을 보였다. 축벽의 간극에서는 모든 시스템, 모든 절단부위에서 $100\;{\mu}m$ 미만의 우수한 적합도를 보였다. L군와 C군의 경우 변연의 외측부와 내측부의 간극차이가 적었으나 KaVo Everest$^{(R)}$와 Dentaim$^{(R)}$의 경우 마진 내측이 외측보다 간극이 큰 특징을 보였다(P<.05). 변연과 내면적합도로 나누어 분석하였을 때 K군과 C군이 D군과 L군보다 상대적으로 더 좋은 변연 및 내면 적합도를 보였고(P<.05) 두 지대치 중 견치가 제2소구치보다 더 좋은 적합도를 보였다(P<.05). 결론: 대부분의 시스템에서 변연 부위의 적합도는 임상적으로 허용 가능한 범위에 있었다. 변연 간극과 내면 간극 모두에서 지대치 중에 견치에서보다 제2소구치에서 더 큰 간극을 나타내었다. 또한 대부분의 시스템에서 축벽보다는 교합면 쪽 간극이 상대적으로 크게 형성되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bindle A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of allceramic CAD/CAM crown-coping on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  2. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74.
  3. Yang JH, Yeo IS, Lee SH, Han JS, Lee JB. Marginal fit of celay/In-Ceram, Conventional In-Ceram and Empress 2 all-ceramic single crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:131-9.
  4. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  5. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74.
  6. Hertlein G, Hoscheler S, Frank S, Suttor D. Marginal fit of CAD/CAM manufactured all ceramic prosthesis. J Dent Res 2001;80:42-4.
  7. Rekow ED. High-technology innovations-and limitations-for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:513-24.
  8. Valderrama S, Van Roekel N, Andersson M, Goodacre CJ, Munoz CA. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:29-37.
  9. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:206-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x
  10. Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90072-5
  11. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  12. Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:786-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90583-V
  13. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  14. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:206-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x
  15. Huh JB, Park CG, Kim HY, Park CK, Shin SW. Evaluation using replica technique on the marginal and internal fitness of zirconia cores by several CAD/CAM systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:135-42. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.2.135
  16. Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL, Levine MS. Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 1983;16:841-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(83)90008-8
  17. Strawn SE, White JM, Marshall GW, Gee L, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions-short term. J Dent 1996;24:417-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00106-9
  18. Koo JY, Lim JH, Cho IH. Marginal fidelity according to the margin types of all ceramic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1997;35:445-57.
  19. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90289-5
  20. Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain-fusedto- metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:24-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90058-7
  21. Davis DR. Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90098-4
  22. Abbate MF, Tjan AH, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:527-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90270-9
  23. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:209-15.
  24. Brukl CE, Nicholson JW, Norling BK. Crown retention and seating on natural teeth with a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:618-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90003-4
  25. Yu JH, Kim YC, Kang DW. A study on the marginal fidelities and fracture strength of IPS Empress 2 ceramic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:606-17.
  26. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  27. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using ccd camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
  28. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model vol.6, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.1
  2. Marginal and internal fit of all ceramic crown using the replica technique and the triple-scan protocol vol.55, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.4.372
  3. Cement Gap에 따른 Zirconia Crown의 파절강도 비교 vol.38, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2016.38.4.299
  4. 왁스 밀링 방법 및 디지털 광 프로젝션 방법으로 제작된 3본 금속 구조물의 적합도 비교 vol.41, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.1.9
  5. 절삭 및 적층 가공법으로 제작된 3본 고정성 국소의치의 변연 및 내면 적합도에 관한 연구 vol.58, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.7
  6. 금속 밀링과 직접 금속 레이저 소결 방식으로 제작한 3본 코발트-크롬 구조물의 변연 및 내부 적합도 비교 평가 vol.42, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2020.42.2.81