Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.3.236

Marginal and internal fitness of three-unit zirconia cores fabricated using several CAD/CAM systems  

Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, U-Sic (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
Kim, Ha-Young (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
Kim, Jong-Eun (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
Lee, Jeong-Yeol (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
Kim, Young-Su (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Shin, Sang-Wan (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.49, no.3, 2011 , pp. 236-244 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was aimed to compare the margin and internal fitness of 3-unit zirconia bridge cores fabricated by several CAD/CAM systems using replica technique. Materials and methods: Three unit-bridge models in which upper canine and upper second premolar were used as abutments and upper first premolar was missed, were fabricated. Fourty models were classified into 4 groups (Cerasys$^{(R)}$ (Group C), Dentaim$^{(R)}$ (Group D), KaVo Everest$^{(R)}$ (Group K), $Lava^{TM}$ (Group L)), and zirconia cores were fabricated by each company. Sixteen points were measured on each abutment by replica technique. Statistical analysis was accomplished with two way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 (${\alpha}$=.05). Results: In most systems, there was a larger gap on inter margin than outer margin. In the Group K, overall fitness was excellent, but the incisal gap was very large. In the Group C, marginal gap was significantly larger than Group K, but overall internal gap was uniform (P<.05). The axial gap was under $100\;{\mu}m$ in all system. The difference between internal and external gap was small on Group L and C. However, internal gap was significantly larger than external gap in Group D (P<.05). The fitness of canine was better than second premolar among abutments (P<.05). Conclusion: The marginal and internal gap was within the clinically allowed range in all of the three systems. There was a larger gap on second premolar than canine on internal and marginal surface. In most systems, there was a larger gap on occlusal surface than axial surface.
Keywords
Marginal fitness; Internal fitness; CAD/CAM; Zirconia core;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bindle A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of allceramic CAD/CAM crown-coping on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74.
3 Brukl CE, Nicholson JW, Norling BK. Crown retention and seating on natural teeth with a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:618-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Yu JH, Kim YC, Kang DW. A study on the marginal fidelities and fracture strength of IPS Empress 2 ceramic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:606-17.
5 Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using ccd camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
7 Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.
9 Strawn SE, White JM, Marshall GW, Gee L, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions-short term. J Dent 1996;24:417-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Koo JY, Lim JH, Cho IH. Marginal fidelity according to the margin types of all ceramic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1997;35:445-57.
11 Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain-fusedto- metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:24-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Davis DR. Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:786-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Abbate MF, Tjan AH, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:527-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:209-15.
16 Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:206-14.   DOI
19 Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL, Levine MS. Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 1983;16:841-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Huh JB, Park CG, Kim HY, Park CK, Shin SW. Evaluation using replica technique on the marginal and internal fitness of zirconia cores by several CAD/CAM systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:135-42.   DOI
21 Yang JH, Yeo IS, Lee SH, Han JS, Lee JB. Marginal fit of celay/In-Ceram, Conventional In-Ceram and Empress 2 all-ceramic single crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:131-9.
22 May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74.
24 Hertlein G, Hoscheler S, Frank S, Suttor D. Marginal fit of CAD/CAM manufactured all ceramic prosthesis. J Dent Res 2001;80:42-4.
25 Rekow ED. High-technology innovations-and limitations-for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:513-24.
26 Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Valderrama S, Van Roekel N, Andersson M, Goodacre CJ, Munoz CA. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:29-37.
28 Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:206-14.   DOI