대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제49권3호
  • /
  • Pages.191-196
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수종 합금의 도재 결합강도

Bond-strength of several metal-meramic alloys and meneered-porcelain

  • 이광훈 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조영범 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정재헌 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김희중 (조선대학교 치과병원 보철과)
  • Lee, Kwang-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University) ;
  • Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2011.11.24
  • 심사 : 2011.05.27
  • 발행 : 2011.07.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 목적: 본 연구는 여러 가지 금속-도재 합금의 도재결합강도를 측정하여 임상에 적용하는 것이 적절한지 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 금속도재소부 전장관으로 가장 많이 사용되는 Ni-Cr 합금(Group 1)과 75% 금합금(Group 2) 및 최근 도재금 합금으로 판매되고 있는 52.5% (Group 3), 51.5% (Group 4), 32% (Group 5), 10% 금합금(Group 6)이 시편으로 제작되었다. 시편은 각각 5개씩 제작되었으며, 제작된 시편에 전용 도재를 소성하고 3점 굴곡 시험을 통하여 도재와 각 금속간의 결합강도를 측정하였다. 결과: Group 1의 도재 결합강도가 $40.62{\pm}3.32$ MPa로 다른 실험군의 도재결합 강도에 비해 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 가장 높은 결합강도를 보였고(P<.05), 다음으로 Group 2가 $37.47{\pm}1.57$ MPa, Group 3이 $35.85{\pm}1.48$ MPa, Group 4가 $35.04{\pm}1.34$ MPa, Group 5가 $33.17{\pm}1.62$ MPa, Group 6가 $30.75{\pm}1.21$ MPa 순으로 결합강도가 감소하였다. Group 2, 3, 4 의 도재결합 강도는 Group 6와 통계학적으로 유의성을 보여주고 있으나(Duncan's test, P<.05), Group 3과 4는 Group 5와 서로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(Duncan's test, P>.05). 도재 결합 강도 차이는 금 함량이 높을수록 강도가 높았고, 모든 실험군에서 ISO 9693에서 제시하는 기준치(25 MPa)보다 높은 수치를 나타내었다. 결론: 실험에 포함된 모든 합금들이 임상적으로 사용 가능할 것으로 추정된다.

Purpose: In this study, we evaluated the bond-strength between a few metal ceramic-alloys and veneered-porcelain and found if the bond strength of metal-ceramic alloy with lower gold content than the presently used gold alloy was high enough. Materials and methods: For this study, after plasticizing porcelain only for gold alloy, metal specimen was fabricated using Ni-Cr alloy and gold alloy with different gold content. Three point flexural test were performed to measure their bond-strength. Results: The bonding strength of Group 1 to porcelain was $40.62{\pm}3.32$ MPa, which was the highest (P<.05). In sequence of decreasing value, Group 2 (75%) was $37.47{\pm}1.57$ MPa, Group 3 (52%) $35.85{\pm}1.48$ MPa, Group 4 (51.5%) $35.04{\pm}1.34$ MPa, Group 5 (32%) $33.17{\pm}1.62$ MPa, Group 6 (10%) $30.75{\pm}1.21$ MPa. Bonding strength of Group 3 and Group 4 to porcelain did not show statistically significant difference with comparison to that of Group 5 (Duncan's test, P>.05), while there was a significant difference between that of Group 2, Group 3 and Group 4 and that of Group 6 (Duncan's test, P<.05). The bonding strength between gold alloy and porcelain increased according to the content of gold. In all experimental groups showed higher value than 25 MPa, which is the least value recommended by ISO 9693. Conclusion: In all groups, bonding strength was higher than 25 MPa, which is the least value of ISO9693. Therefore, it is considered that metal gold alloy with low gold content is clinically usable.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bagby M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. Metal ceramic compatibility: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:21-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90259-F
  2. Dent RJ, Preston JD, Moffa JP, Caputo A. Effect of oxidation on ceramometal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:59-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90243-8
  3. Moffa JP. Alternative dental casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:733-46.
  4. Moffa JP, Lugassy AA, Guckes AD, Gettleman L. An evaluation of nonprecious alloys for use with porcelain veneers. Part I. Physical properties. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:424-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90164-9
  5. Kelly JR, Rose TC. Nonprecious alloys for use in fixed prosthodontics: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:363-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90279-2
  6. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby: 2001. pp. 488-512.
  7. International Standard Organization (ISO)/DIS 9693 (1999) Dental ceramic fused to metal restorative materials. Draft International Standard.
  8. Knap FJ, Ryge G. Study of bond strength of dental porcelain fused to metal. J Dent Res 1966;45:1047-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345660450040501
  9. Shell JS, Nielsen JP. Study of the bond between gold alloys and porcelain. J Dent Res 1962;41:1424-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345620410062101
  10. Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Gray A, Lee RB. Delayed crack development in porcelain due to incompatibility stress. J Dent Res 1988;67:1086-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670080501
  11. Probster L, Maiwald U, Weber H. Three-point bending strength of ceramics fused to cast titanium. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:313-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00083.x
  12. Atsu S, Berksun S. Bond strength of three porcelains to two forms of titanium using two firing atmospheres. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:567-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110267
  13. Yilmaz H, Dincer C. Comparison of the bond compatibility of titanium and an NiCr alloy to dental porcelain. J Dent 1999;27:215-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00045-1
  14. Derand T, Hero H. Bond strength of porcelain on cast vs. wrought titanium. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:184-8.
  15. Pang IC, Gilbert JL, Chai J, Lautenschlager EP. Bonding characteristics of low-fusing porcelain bonded to pure titanium and palladiumcopper alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80267-7
  16. Wight TA, Bauman JC, Pelleu GB Jr. An evaluation of four variables affecting the bond strength of porcelain to nonprecious alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:570-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90172-X
  17. Guinn JW 3rd, Griswold WH, Vermilyea SG. The effect of cooling rate on the apparent bond strength of porcelain-metal couples. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:551-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90361-4
  18. Schaffer SP. An approach to determining the bond strength of ceramometal systems. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:282-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90011-7
  19. Caputo AA, Dunn B, Reisbick MH. A flexural method for evaluation of metal-ceramic bond strengths. J Dent Res 1977;56:1501-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345770560121601
  20. Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Fairhurst CW. Comparative evaluation of ceramic-metal bond tests using finite element stress analysis. J Dent Res 1980;59:608-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590030901
  21. Lenz J, Schwarz S, Schwickerath H, Sperner F, Schafer A. Bond strength of metal-ceramic systems in three-point flexure bond test. J Appl Biomater 1995;6:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.770060108
  22. Barghi N, Lorenzana RE. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:429-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90080-4
  23. Adachi M, Mackert JR Jr, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060101
  24. Kaus T, Probster L, Weber H. Clinical follow-up study of ceramic veneered titanium restorations--three-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:9-15.
  25. Kimura H, Horng CJ, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Effects of retention and bonding agent on bond strength of the titanium porcelain system. J Osaka Uni Dent Sch 1991;31:23-32.
  26. Hsu CC, Lee YP, Hong CC. Effects of different ceramic firing cycles on cp Titanium-Ceramic flexural bond strength under cyclic fatigue loading. [IADR abstract 1088] J Dent Res 2001;80(special issue).
  27. McLean JW. Dental ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1983. pp. 13-49.
  28. Kvam K, Derand T, Austrheim EK. Fracture toughness and flexural strength of dental ceramics for titanium. Biomaterials 1995;16:73-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)91099-K
  29. Esquivel JF, Chai J, Wozniak WT. The physical properties of low-fusing porcelains for titanium. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:563-71.
  30. Hautaniemi JA, Hero H, Juhanoja JT. On the bonding of porcelain on titanium. J Mater Sci 1992;3:186-91.

피인용 문헌

  1. 금속-도재관용 Ni-Cr합금의 조성변화와 소성단계에 따른 전단결합강도 vol.35, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2013.35.4.353
  2. 치과 도재용착용 Ni-Cr 합금의 열처리에 따른 결합력 연구 vol.38, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2016.38.2.69