Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.3.191

Bond-strength of several metal-meramic alloys and meneered-porcelain  

Lee, Kwang-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University)
Cho, Young-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University)
Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University)
Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Chosun University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.49, no.3, 2011 , pp. 191-196 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we evaluated the bond-strength between a few metal ceramic-alloys and veneered-porcelain and found if the bond strength of metal-ceramic alloy with lower gold content than the presently used gold alloy was high enough. Materials and methods: For this study, after plasticizing porcelain only for gold alloy, metal specimen was fabricated using Ni-Cr alloy and gold alloy with different gold content. Three point flexural test were performed to measure their bond-strength. Results: The bonding strength of Group 1 to porcelain was $40.62{\pm}3.32$ MPa, which was the highest (P<.05). In sequence of decreasing value, Group 2 (75%) was $37.47{\pm}1.57$ MPa, Group 3 (52%) $35.85{\pm}1.48$ MPa, Group 4 (51.5%) $35.04{\pm}1.34$ MPa, Group 5 (32%) $33.17{\pm}1.62$ MPa, Group 6 (10%) $30.75{\pm}1.21$ MPa. Bonding strength of Group 3 and Group 4 to porcelain did not show statistically significant difference with comparison to that of Group 5 (Duncan's test, P>.05), while there was a significant difference between that of Group 2, Group 3 and Group 4 and that of Group 6 (Duncan's test, P<.05). The bonding strength between gold alloy and porcelain increased according to the content of gold. In all experimental groups showed higher value than 25 MPa, which is the least value recommended by ISO 9693. Conclusion: In all groups, bonding strength was higher than 25 MPa, which is the least value of ISO9693. Therefore, it is considered that metal gold alloy with low gold content is clinically usable.
Keywords
Porcelain fused to metal crown; Bond strength; Gold alloy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 McLean JW. Dental ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1983. pp. 13-49.
2 Kvam K, Derand T, Austrheim EK. Fracture toughness and flexural strength of dental ceramics for titanium. Biomaterials 1995;16:73-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Fairhurst CW. Comparative evaluation of ceramic-metal bond tests using finite element stress analysis. J Dent Res 1980;59:608-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lenz J, Schwarz S, Schwickerath H, Sperner F, Schafer A. Bond strength of metal-ceramic systems in three-point flexure bond test. J Appl Biomater 1995;6:55-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Barghi N, Lorenzana RE. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:429-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Adachi M, Mackert JR Jr, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kaus T, Probster L, Weber H. Clinical follow-up study of ceramic veneered titanium restorations--three-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:9-15.
8 Wight TA, Bauman JC, Pelleu GB Jr. An evaluation of four variables affecting the bond strength of porcelain to nonprecious alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:570-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Guinn JW 3rd, Griswold WH, Vermilyea SG. The effect of cooling rate on the apparent bond strength of porcelain-metal couples. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:551-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Schaffer SP. An approach to determining the bond strength of ceramometal systems. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:282-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Caputo AA, Dunn B, Reisbick MH. A flexural method for evaluation of metal-ceramic bond strengths. J Dent Res 1977;56:1501-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Yilmaz H, Dincer C. Comparison of the bond compatibility of titanium and an NiCr alloy to dental porcelain. J Dent 1999;27:215-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Derand T, Hero H. Bond strength of porcelain on cast vs. wrought titanium. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:184-8.
14 Pang IC, Gilbert JL, Chai J, Lautenschlager EP. Bonding characteristics of low-fusing porcelain bonded to pure titanium and palladiumcopper alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:17-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Gray A, Lee RB. Delayed crack development in porcelain due to incompatibility stress. J Dent Res 1988;67:1086-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Probster L, Maiwald U, Weber H. Three-point bending strength of ceramics fused to cast titanium. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:313-9.   DOI
17 Atsu S, Berksun S. Bond strength of three porcelains to two forms of titanium using two firing atmospheres. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:567-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Knap FJ, Ryge G. Study of bond strength of dental porcelain fused to metal. J Dent Res 1966;45:1047-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby: 2001. pp. 488-512.
20 International Standard Organization (ISO)/DIS 9693 (1999) Dental ceramic fused to metal restorative materials. Draft International Standard.
21 Shell JS, Nielsen JP. Study of the bond between gold alloys and porcelain. J Dent Res 1962;41:1424-37.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hsu CC, Lee YP, Hong CC. Effects of different ceramic firing cycles on cp Titanium-Ceramic flexural bond strength under cyclic fatigue loading. [IADR abstract 1088] J Dent Res 2001;80(special issue).
23 Dent RJ, Preston JD, Moffa JP, Caputo A. Effect of oxidation on ceramometal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:59-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Moffa JP. Alternative dental casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:733-46.
25 Moffa JP, Lugassy AA, Guckes AD, Gettleman L. An evaluation of nonprecious alloys for use with porcelain veneers. Part I. Physical properties. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:424-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Kelly JR, Rose TC. Nonprecious alloys for use in fixed prosthodontics: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:363-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Bagby M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. Metal ceramic compatibility: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:21-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Esquivel JF, Chai J, Wozniak WT. The physical properties of low-fusing porcelains for titanium. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:563-71.
29 Hautaniemi JA, Hero H, Juhanoja JT. On the bonding of porcelain on titanium. J Mater Sci 1992;3:186-91.
30 Kimura H, Horng CJ, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Effects of retention and bonding agent on bond strength of the titanium porcelain system. J Osaka Uni Dent Sch 1991;31:23-32.