DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic Diversity Assessment and Phylogenetic Analysis of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in RDA Genebank Collection using SSRs

  • Received : 2010.10.19
  • Accepted : 2011.04.07
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

It is very crucial to evaluate the genetic diversity of peanut genetic resources for identification of peanut germplasm accessions and variety improvement. Cultivated peanut generally has two subspecies, hypogaea and fastigiata. In this study, we identified peanut into three plant types, virginia (var. hypogaea), spanish (var. vulgaris), and valencia (var. fastigiata). Former one belongs to ssp. hypogaea and latter two are involved in ssp. fastigiata. Twenty SSR markers were used to assess the genetic variation of three sets, hypogaea, vulgaris, and fastigiata, respectively. Out of variety-specific SSR primers tried in this study, ten pairs of SSR primers showed polymorphisms. Each accession could be identified by a specific set of polymorphic SSR primers, and allele number was evaluated among accessions, with an average of 6.7 in var. hypogaea and 5.4 in var. vulgaris and fastigiata. For evaluation of genetic diversity, gene diversity ranged from 0.336 to 0.844 and PIC (polymorphism information contents) ranged from 0.324 to 0.827 were investigated. Dendrograms based on genetic distances were constructed, which showed the existence of three different clusters. And these three different clusters might be associated with the genes involved in three plant types. The results also suggested that there were plentiful SSR polymorphisms among peanut germplasm accessions in RDA (Rural Development Administration, Korea) Genebank and SSRs might play an important role in evaluating peanut accessions and cultivar improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Amos, W., S.J. Sawcer, R.W. Feakes, and D.C. Rubinsztein. 1996. Microsatellites show mutational bias and and heterozygotic instability. Nat. Genet. 13:390-391. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0896-390
  2. Anderson, J.A., G.A. Churchill, J.E. Autrique, S.D. Tansley, and M.E. Sorrels. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36:181-186. https://doi.org/10.1139/g93-024
  3. Dellaporta, S.L., J. Wood, and J.B. Hicks. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1:19-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712670
  4. Ellegren, H., C.R. Primmer, and B.C. Sheldon. 1995. Microsatellites' evolution: directionality or bias? Nat. Genet. 11:360-362. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1295-360
  5. He G.H., R.H. Meng, H. Gao, B.Z. Guo, G.Q. Gao, M. Newman, R.N. Pittman, and C.S. Prakash. 2005. Simple sequence repeat markers for botanical varieties of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaeae L.). Euphytica 142:131-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-1043-3
  6. Hilu, K.W. and H.T. Stalker. 1995. Genetic relationships between peanut and wild species of Arachis sect. Arachis (Fabaceae): Evidence from RAPDs. Plant Syst. Evol. 198:167-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984735
  7. Hopkins, M.S., A.M. Casa, T. Wang, S.E. Mitchell, R.E. Dean, G.D. Kochert, and S. Kresovich. 1999. Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in peanut. Crop. Sci. 39:1243-1247. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040047x
  8. Kochert, G., T. Halward, W.D. Branch, and C.E. Simpson. 1991. RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:565-570.
  9. Kochert, G., H.M. Stalker, M. Gimenes, L. Galgaro, C.R. Lopes, and K. Moore. 1996. RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origins and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). American J. Bot. 83: 1282-1291. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446112
  10. Krapovickas, A. and W.C. Gregory. 1994. Taxonomia del genero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 8:1-86.
  11. Liu, K. and S.V. Muse. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Oxford University Press. Oxford, England. pp. 2128-2129.
  12. Rolf, F.J. 2000. NTSYS-pc; numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Software, New York.
  13. Schuelke, M. 2000. An economic methods for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:233-234. https://doi.org/10.1038/72708
  14. Scheef, E.A., M.D. Casler, and G. Kung. 2003. Development of species-specific SCAR markers in bentgrass. Crop Sci. 43:345-349. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0345
  15. Singh, A.K., S. Gurtu, and R. Jambunathan. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Arachis on seed protein profiles. Euphytica 74:219-225.
  16. Song M.T., J.H. Lee, S.B. Lee, Y.S. Cho, J.H. Ku, K.I. Seo, S.H. Choi and H.G. Hwang. 2003. Genetic diversity of Korean rice breeding parents as measured by DNA fingerprinting with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. J. Korean Plant Res. 6:16-26.
  17. Song, Q., I.Y. Choi, K.H. Nam and N.S. Kim. 1998. Genotype fingerprinting, differentiation and association between morphological traits and SSR loci of soybean landraces. J. Korean Plant Res. 1:81-91.
  18. Stalker, H.T. and C.E. Simpson. 1995. Germplasm resources in Arachis. In H.E. Pattee & HT Stalker (eds.). Advances in peanut science. APRES, Inc. Stillwater, OK. pp. 14-53.
  19. Tang R., G. Gao, L. He, Z. Han, S. Shan, R. Zhong, C. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y. Li, and W. Zhuang. 2007. Genetic diversity in cultivated groundnut based on SSR markers. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 334:449-459.
  20. Varshney, R.K., A. Graner, and M.E. Sorrels. 2005. Genetic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 23:48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005
  21. Williams, D.E. 1989. Exploration of Amazonian Bolivia yields rare peanut landlaces. Diversity 5:12-13.
  22. Yap, I.V. and R.J. Nelson. 1996. Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper series 14, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.
  23. Yi, J.Y., J.R. Lee, D.S. Park, M.C. Lee, and C.G Kim. 2009. Propagation and evaluation of characteristics in oil crops. Annual Reports of National Agrobioversity Center.

Cited by

  1. Genetic Diversity and Relationship Analysis of Genus Taraxacum Accessions Collected in Korea vol.25, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.3.329