Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2011.24.3.272

Genetic Diversity Assessment and Phylogenetic Analysis of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in RDA Genebank Collection using SSRs  

Yi, Jung-Yoon (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Lee, Gi-An (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Lee, Jeong-Ran (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Lee, Myung-Chul (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Kang, Man-Jung (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Baek, Hyung-Jin (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Kim, Chung-Kon (National Agrobiodiversity Center, NAAS, RDA)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Plant Resources / v.24, no.3, 2011 , pp. 272-279 More about this Journal
Abstract
It is very crucial to evaluate the genetic diversity of peanut genetic resources for identification of peanut germplasm accessions and variety improvement. Cultivated peanut generally has two subspecies, hypogaea and fastigiata. In this study, we identified peanut into three plant types, virginia (var. hypogaea), spanish (var. vulgaris), and valencia (var. fastigiata). Former one belongs to ssp. hypogaea and latter two are involved in ssp. fastigiata. Twenty SSR markers were used to assess the genetic variation of three sets, hypogaea, vulgaris, and fastigiata, respectively. Out of variety-specific SSR primers tried in this study, ten pairs of SSR primers showed polymorphisms. Each accession could be identified by a specific set of polymorphic SSR primers, and allele number was evaluated among accessions, with an average of 6.7 in var. hypogaea and 5.4 in var. vulgaris and fastigiata. For evaluation of genetic diversity, gene diversity ranged from 0.336 to 0.844 and PIC (polymorphism information contents) ranged from 0.324 to 0.827 were investigated. Dendrograms based on genetic distances were constructed, which showed the existence of three different clusters. And these three different clusters might be associated with the genes involved in three plant types. The results also suggested that there were plentiful SSR polymorphisms among peanut germplasm accessions in RDA (Rural Development Administration, Korea) Genebank and SSRs might play an important role in evaluating peanut accessions and cultivar improvement.
Keywords
Peanut; SSR; Variety; Hypogaea; Vulgaris; Fastigiata;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Liu, K. and S.V. Muse. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Oxford University Press. Oxford, England. pp. 2128-2129.
2 Rolf, F.J. 2000. NTSYS-pc; numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Software, New York.
3 Schuelke, M. 2000. An economic methods for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:233-234.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Scheef, E.A., M.D. Casler, and G. Kung. 2003. Development of species-specific SCAR markers in bentgrass. Crop Sci. 43:345-349.   DOI
5 Singh, A.K., S. Gurtu, and R. Jambunathan. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Arachis on seed protein profiles. Euphytica 74:219-225.
6 Song M.T., J.H. Lee, S.B. Lee, Y.S. Cho, J.H. Ku, K.I. Seo, S.H. Choi and H.G. Hwang. 2003. Genetic diversity of Korean rice breeding parents as measured by DNA fingerprinting with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. J. Korean Plant Res. 6:16-26.
7 Yap, I.V. and R.J. Nelson. 1996. Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper series 14, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.
8 Yi, J.Y., J.R. Lee, D.S. Park, M.C. Lee, and C.G Kim. 2009. Propagation and evaluation of characteristics in oil crops. Annual Reports of National Agrobioversity Center.
9 Ellegren, H., C.R. Primmer, and B.C. Sheldon. 1995. Microsatellites' evolution: directionality or bias? Nat. Genet. 11:360-362.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Dellaporta, S.L., J. Wood, and J.B. Hicks. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1:19-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 He G.H., R.H. Meng, H. Gao, B.Z. Guo, G.Q. Gao, M. Newman, R.N. Pittman, and C.S. Prakash. 2005. Simple sequence repeat markers for botanical varieties of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaeae L.). Euphytica 142:131-136.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hilu, K.W. and H.T. Stalker. 1995. Genetic relationships between peanut and wild species of Arachis sect. Arachis (Fabaceae): Evidence from RAPDs. Plant Syst. Evol. 198:167-178.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hopkins, M.S., A.M. Casa, T. Wang, S.E. Mitchell, R.E. Dean, G.D. Kochert, and S. Kresovich. 1999. Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in peanut. Crop. Sci. 39:1243-1247.   DOI
14 Kochert, G., T. Halward, W.D. Branch, and C.E. Simpson. 1991. RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:565-570.
15 Kochert, G., H.M. Stalker, M. Gimenes, L. Galgaro, C.R. Lopes, and K. Moore. 1996. RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origins and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). American J. Bot. 83: 1282-1291.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Krapovickas, A. and W.C. Gregory. 1994. Taxonomia del genero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 8:1-86.
17 Varshney, R.K., A. Graner, and M.E. Sorrels. 2005. Genetic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 23:48-55.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Song, Q., I.Y. Choi, K.H. Nam and N.S. Kim. 1998. Genotype fingerprinting, differentiation and association between morphological traits and SSR loci of soybean landraces. J. Korean Plant Res. 1:81-91.
19 Stalker, H.T. and C.E. Simpson. 1995. Germplasm resources in Arachis. In H.E. Pattee & HT Stalker (eds.). Advances in peanut science. APRES, Inc. Stillwater, OK. pp. 14-53.
20 Tang R., G. Gao, L. He, Z. Han, S. Shan, R. Zhong, C. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y. Li, and W. Zhuang. 2007. Genetic diversity in cultivated groundnut based on SSR markers. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 334:449-459.
21 Williams, D.E. 1989. Exploration of Amazonian Bolivia yields rare peanut landlaces. Diversity 5:12-13.
22 Anderson, J.A., G.A. Churchill, J.E. Autrique, S.D. Tansley, and M.E. Sorrels. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36:181-186.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Amos, W., S.J. Sawcer, R.W. Feakes, and D.C. Rubinsztein. 1996. Microsatellites show mutational bias and and heterozygotic instability. Nat. Genet. 13:390-391.   DOI   ScienceOn