DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multiple Maternal Origins of Korean Native Chicken Based on the mtDNA D-loop Variation

mtDNA D-loop 변이로 확인된 한국재래닭의 다양한 모계기원

  • 조창연 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 이풍연 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 고응규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김학규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박미나 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 연성흠 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2010.09.30
  • Accepted : 2011.03.14
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the mitochondrial DNA D-loop region of Korean native chicken to clarify their phylogenetic relationships, possible maternal origin and routes of introduction into Korea. A 1231-1232 bp DNA fragment from the mtDNA D-loop region was sequenced in 315 chickens from 11 populations, Thirty-five variable sites that defined 21 haplotyes were observed. In Korean native chicken, diversity accounted for 90% of the variation, little differentiation among the strains. The 21 haplotypes clustered into 5 clades which were A, B, C, D and E. These results indicate that Korean chickens were derived from China with multiple origins.

우리나라 재래닭의 기원을 구명하기 위해서 mtDNA D-loop 영역을 분석한 결과, 1,231~1,232개의 염기구성되어 있으며, 35개소에서 변이가 관찰되었다. 변이 부위를 이용하여 Haplotype을 분류한 결과, 21종으로 분류되었으며 이중 9개인 GenBank에 미등록된 것으로 밝혀졌다. Hplotype 다양성으로 추정한 한국 재래닭의 유전적 변이성은 중국의 재래닭과 유사한 것으로 추정되었다. Haplotype에 대한 Network 분석 결과, 재래닭은 5개의 Clade로 분류되었다. 이들 Clade에 대한 각 집단의 분포 현황으로 한국 재래닭은 운남성 및 중국 재래닭이 보인 결과와 유사하나, 일본의 재래닭과는 약간 상이한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 이상의 결과로 우리나라 재래닭은 공통선조가 다른 5개 이상의 모계가 중국을 통하여 유래되었으며, 일본에도 전파된 것이 확인되었다. 한편, 일본은 한반도를 유래하지 않은 닭의 유입이 있었던 것으로 추정된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Sykes BC, Richards MB 1995 Mitochondrial portraits of human populations using median networks. Genetics 141(2):743-753.
  2. Berthouly-Salazar C, Rognon X, Van TN, Gely M, Chi CV, Tixier-Boichard M, Bed'Hom B, Bruneau N, Verrier E, Maillard JC, Michaux JR 2010 Vietnamese chickens: A gate towards Asian genetic diversity. BMC Genet 11(1):53.
  3. Eriksson J, Larson G, Gunnarsson U, Bed'hom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Strömstedt L, Wright D, Jungerius A, Vereijken A, Randi E, Jensen P, Andersson L 2008 Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genet 4(2):e1000010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000010
  4. Felsenstein J 1989 PHYLIP. Phylogeny interface package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166.
  5. Fumihito A, Miyake T, Sumi SI, Tkata M, Ohno S, Kondo N 1994 One subspecies of the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus gallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(26):12505-12509. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.26.12505
  6. Fumihito A, Miyake T, Takada M, Shingu R, Endo T, Gojobori T, Kondo N, Ohno S 1996 Monophyletic origin and unique dispersal patterns of domestic fowls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(13):6792-6795. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.13.6792
  7. Groeneveld LF, Lenstra JA, Eding H, Toro MA, Scherf B, Pilling D, Negrini R, Finlay EK, Jianlin H, Groeneveld E, Weigend S 2010 Genetic diversity in farm animals-A review. Anim Genet 41:6-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x
  8. Hillel J, Groenen M, Tixier-Boichard M, Koorl AB, David L, Kirzhner VM, Burke T, Barrre-Dirie A, Crooijmans RP, Elo K, Feldman MW, Freidlin PJ, Maki-Tanila A, Oortwijn M, Thoson P, Vignal A, Wimmers K, Weigend S 2003 Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet Sel Evol 35(5):533-557. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-6-533
  9. Hoque MR, Jung KC, Park BK, Choi KD, Lee JH 2009 Genetic variability of mtDNA D-loop region in Korean native chickens. Kor J Poult Sci 36(4):323-328. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.4.323
  10. Kanginakudru S, Metta M, Jakti RD, Nagaraju J 2008 Genetic evidence from Indian red jungle fowl corroborates multiple domestication of modern day chicken. BMC Evol Biol 8:174. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-174
  11. Lee YJ, Bhuiyan MSA, Chung HJ, Jung WY, Choi KDm, Jang BGm, Peak WK, Jeon JT, Park CS, Lee JH 2007 Mitochondrial DNA diversity of Korean ogol chicken. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 20(4):477-481. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.477
  12. Librado P, Rozas J 2009 DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25(11):1451-1452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
  13. Liu, YP, Wu GS, Yao YG, Miao YW, Luikart G, Baig M, Beja-pereira A, Ding ZL, Palanichamy MG, Zhang YP 2006 Multiple maternal origins of chickens: Out of the Asian jungles. Mol Phy Evol 38(1):12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.09.014
  14. Lynch M, Crease TJ 1990 The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation. Mol Biol Evol 7:377-394.
  15. Mwacharo JM, Nomura K, Hanada H, Jinalin H, Hanotte O, Amano T 2007 Genetic relationships among Kenyan and other East African indigenous chickens. Anim Genet 38(5):485-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01641.x
  16. Niu D, Fu Y, Lua J, Ruan H, Yu XP, Chen G, Zhang YP 2002 The origin and genetic diversity of Chinese native chicken breeds. Biochem Genet 40(5):163-174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015832108669
  17. Oka T, Ino Y, Nomura K, Kawashima S, Kuwayama T, Hanada H, Amano T, Tkada M, Takahata N, Hayashi Y, Akishinonomiya F 2007 Analysis of mtDNA sequences shows Japanese native chickens have multiple origins. Anim Genet 38(3):287-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01604.x
  18. Revay T, Bodzsar N, Mobegi VE, Hanotte O, Hidas A 2010 Origin of Hungarian indigenous chicken breeds inferred from mitochondrial DNA D-loop sequences. Anim Genet 41(5):548-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02041.x
  19. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, messeguer X, Rozas R 2003 DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19(18):2496-2497. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359
  20. Schlotterer C 2004 The evolution of molecular markers-just a matter of fashion? Nat Rev Genet 5(1):63-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1249
  21. Tajima F 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123(3):585-595.
  22. West B, Zhou BX 1988. Did chicken go north? New evidence for domestication. J Archaeol Sci 15:515-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(88)90080-5
  23. Zhou B, Chen SY, Zhu Q, Yao YH, Liu YP 2010. Martilineal components and genetic relationship of silkies from China and Japan. J Poultry Sci 47(1):22-27. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.009047

Cited by

  1. The breeding history and commercial development of the Korean native chicken vol.73, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391600088X
  2. Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics of the Meat in Four Lines of Korean Native Chickens vol.42, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.4.335
  3. DNA Markers for the Genetic Diversity in Korean Native Chicken Breeds: A Review vol.43, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.2.63
  4. Mitochondrial D-Loop Variations for Discrimination of Commercial Korean Native Chicken Populations vol.39, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.4.311
  5. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and analysis of genetic diversity in Korean chicken lines vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192063