The Case Study and Its Implication on the Breach of Rules of Origin in FTAs

FTA 원산지규정 위반 판정사례와 시사점

  • 이영수 (경북대학교 경제통상학부) ;
  • 권순국 (경북대학교 경제통상학부)
  • Received : 2011.01.30
  • Accepted : 2011.02.23
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

The term rules of origin(RoO) actually speaks for itself, referring to the rules which determine the origin of goods in international trade. The importance of RoO has grown significantly as preferential agreements expand and countries have treated similar imported goods differently according to where the product was made. The purpose of this paper is to study the main case study and its implication of RoO in FTAs. According to survey, the degree of using FTAs in Korea export firms is sharply low. Major reasons are that rules of origin differ from country to country in the FTAs, and that Korean firms have yet to work out what the RoO are. Chapter II of this paper views criteria of the determination country of origin of goods. Chapter III introduces the main case study of FTA rules of origin. Chapter VI presents implication through the case studies and finally concluded this study. In conclusion, Korea needs to build up its own position for rules of origin and provides rules of origin experts into the market. In-depth study and evaluation about Korea's existing FTAs RoO should be carried out to prepare for future FTAs.

Keywords